234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35349974)
1. High survival rate at mid-term follow up of porous tantalum cones for bone defects in revision total knee replacement: A 3-11 years follow up report.
Rossi SMP; Perticarini L; Ghiara M; Jannelli E; Cortesi L; Benazzo F
Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():175-182. PubMed ID: 35349974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects.
Eder-Halbedl M; Fink A; Pietsch M; Djahani O; Hofmann S
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Dec; 31(12):5496-5506. PubMed ID: 37819600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Loss in Revision TKA.
Watters TS; Martin JR; Levy DL; Yang CC; Kim RH; Dennis DA
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3468-3473. PubMed ID: 28697864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tantalum Cones for Severe Bone Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
De Martino I; Mancino F; Di Matteo V; Singlitico A; Maccauro G; Gasparini G
J Arthroplasty; 2023 May; 38(5):886-892. PubMed ID: 36481282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total knee arthroplasty revision with trabecular tantalum cones: Preliminary retrospective study of 51 patients from two centres with a minimal 2-year follow-up.
Girerd D; Parratte S; Lunebourg A; Boureau F; Ollivier M; Pasquier G; Putman S; Migaud H; Argenson JN
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 102(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 27052939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.
Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Bohl DD; Brown NM; McDowell MA; Levine BR; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG; Della Valle CJ
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 28844630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cementless Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves Used for Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Short- to Mid-Term Outcomes.
Shen J; Zhang T; Zhang Y; Dong Y; Zhou Y; Guo L
Orthop Surg; 2023 Feb; 15(2):488-495. PubMed ID: 36479829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement.
Meneghini RM; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jan; 90(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 18171960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical Survivorship of Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Hinged Knees and Tantalum Cones at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
Abdelaziz H; Jaramillo R; Gehrke T; Ohlmeier M; Citak M
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Dec; 34(12):3018-3022. PubMed ID: 31351856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation.
Fedorka CJ; Chen AF; Pagnotto MR; Crossett LS; Klatt BA
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 May; 26(5):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 28314891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Potter GD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(15):1286-91. PubMed ID: 27489319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Heidenreich MJ; Lanting BA; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 35257822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty are Reliable for Fixation at Mean 5-Year Follow-Up.
Kayani B; Howard LC; Neufeld ME; Greidanus NV; Masri BA; Garbuz DS
J Arthroplasty; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38508344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Two Year Follow Up Study.
Denehy KM; Abhari S; Krebs VE; Higuera-Rueda CA; Samuel LT; Sultan AA; Mont MA; Malkani AL
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2439-2443. PubMed ID: 31000405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tantalum cones for major osteolysis in revision knee replacement.
Rao BM; Kamal TT; Vafaye J; Moss M
Bone Joint J; 2013 Aug; 95-B(8):1069-74. PubMed ID: 23908422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Novel metaphyseal porous titanium cones allow favorable outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Shichman I; Oakley C; Willems JH; van Hellemondt GG; Heesterbeek P; Rozell J; Marwin S; Schwarzkopf R
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Mar; 143(3):1537-1547. PubMed ID: 36243781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Surgical technique.
Meneghini RM; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91 Suppl 2 Pt 1():131-8. PubMed ID: 19255205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Management of the bone loss by metaphyseal sleeves in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: clinical experience and outcome after forty three cases.
Gill UN; Ahmed N; Noor SS; Memon IA; Memon ZA
Int Orthop; 2020 Nov; 44(11):2315-2320. PubMed ID: 32556384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review.
Limberg AK; Tibbo ME; Pagnano MW; Perry KI; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):458-462. PubMed ID: 32228079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
