234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35349974)
21. Varus-Valgus Constrained Implants in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Mean Clinical Follow-Up of Six Years.
Hernandez NM; Hinton ZW; Wu CJ; Wellman SS; Jiranek WA; Seyler TM
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jul; 36(7S):S303-S307. PubMed ID: 33558046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Addressing large tibial osseous defects in primary total knee arthroplasty using porous tantalum cones.
You JS; Wright AR; Hasegawa I; Kobayashi B; Kawahara M; Wang J; Nakasone CK
Knee; 2019 Jan; 26(1):228-239. PubMed ID: 30554910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA.
De Martino I; De Santis V; Sculco PK; D'Apolito R; Assini JB; Gasparini G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 473(10):3176-82. PubMed ID: 25968895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Survivorship and Radiographic Evaluation of Metaphyseal Cones With Short Cemented Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Behery OA; Shing EZ; Yu Z; Springer BD; Fehring TK; Otero JE
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Feb; 37(2):330-335. PubMed ID: 34742873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mid term outcomes of a novel metaphyseal porous titanium cone in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Shichman I; Anil U; van Hellemondt G; Gupta S; Willems J; Deshmukh AJ; Rodriguez JA; Lutes WB; Schwarzkopf R
J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2023 Nov; 46():102282. PubMed ID: 38196965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Surgical Management of Tibial Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes and Radiographic Analysis of Tantalum Cones, Titanium Cones and Titanium Sleeves.
Gibon E; Vasilopoulos T; Sipavicius E; Deen JT; Prieto HA; Gray CF; Parvataneni HK; Pulido L
Iowa Orthop J; 2022 Jun; 42(1):145-153. PubMed ID: 35821926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Porous Tantalum Tibial Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Excellent 10-Year Survivorship.
Hadley ML; Harmer JR; Wright BH; Larson DR; Abdel MP; Berry DJ; Lewallen DG
J Arthroplasty; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38677340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Aseptic Loosening of Porous Metaphyseal Sleeves and Tantalum Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
Roach RP; Clair AJ; Behery OA; Thakkar SC; Iorio R; Deshmukh AJ
J Knee Surg; 2021 Aug; 34(10):1033-1041. PubMed ID: 32074656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. A promising short-term result with 29 cones in 21 patients.
Villanueva-Martínez M; De la Torre-Escudero B; Rojo-Manaute JM; Ríos-Luna A; Chana-Rodriguez F
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Jun; 28(6):988-93. PubMed ID: 23414934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Short-term effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve and MBT implant].
Guo L; Du Y; Zhang M; Sun J; Jin Z; Peng Y; Shen J; Zhou Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 33(3):302-306. PubMed ID: 30874385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is hybrid fixation in revision TKA using LCCK prostheses reliable?
Laudren A; Delacroix R; Huten D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2023 Sep; 109(5):103583. PubMed ID: 36878283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty?
Lachiewicz PF; Bolognesi MP; Henderson RA; Soileau ES; Vail TP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Jan; 470(1):199-204. PubMed ID: 21465329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Development and Verification of Novel Porous Titanium Metaphyseal Cones for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Faizan A; Bhowmik-Stoker M; Alipit V; Kirk AE; Krebs VE; Harwin SF; Meneghini RM
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1946-1953. PubMed ID: 28196619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. No Difference Between Trabecular Metal Cones and Femoral Head Allografts in Revision TKA: Minimum 5-year Followup.
Sandiford NA; Misur P; Garbuz DS; Greidanus NV; Masri BA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):118-124. PubMed ID: 27287857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mid-term results of tibial cones : reasonable survivorship but increased failure in those with significant bone loss and prior infection.
Hernandez NM; Hinton ZW; Wu CJ; Ryan SP; Bolognesi MP
Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):158-164. PubMed ID: 34053275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Metaphyseal cones combined with diaphyseal impaction grafting provide good outcomes and survival in a complex revision total knee arthroplasty: a matched comparative analysis.
Dzidzishvili L; Sáez D; Calvo E
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):577-583. PubMed ID: 37656276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Revision total knee arthroplasty using metaphyseal sleeves at short-term follow-up.
Huang R; Barrazueta G; Ong A; Orozco F; Jafari M; Coyle C; Austin M
Orthopedics; 2014 Sep; 37(9):e804-9. PubMed ID: 25350623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Tetreault MW; Perry KI; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):107-115. PubMed ID: 32475272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty.
Howard JL; Kudera J; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Mar; 93(5):478-84. PubMed ID: 21368080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Short-term Outcomes of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Remily EA; Dávila Castrodad IM; Mohamed NS; Wilkie WA; Kelemen MN; Delanois RE
Orthopedics; 2021 Jan; 44(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 33284980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
