133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3535161)
1. [Chlamydia trachomatis. Direct detection with an immunofluorescence test].
Iveland H; Skaug K; Dahl M; Bergan T; Stray-Pedersen B; Anestad G; Gundersen T; Andersen GM
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1986 Aug; 106(22):1689-90, 1673. PubMed ID: 3535161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Rapid detection of Chlamydia trachomatis using monoclonal antibodies in the immunofluorescence test].
Strauss J; Podanná B; Drazdáková M; Kastánková V; Tryzna R
Cas Lek Cesk; 1987 Sep; 126(39):1215-20. PubMed ID: 3311378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Chlamydia trachomatis: detection using a direct test and culture in 100 genital specimens].
Dutilh B; Bebear C
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1985; 43(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 3896054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in routine clinical practice: increased sensitivity of cell culture in comparison with the microimmunofluorescence test].
Sterzik K; Rosenbusch B; Danner B; Heeg KM; Wolf A; Lauritzen C
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1988 Dec; 48(12):881-3. PubMed ID: 3069566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiple sites for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women--does it matter?
Joseph AT; Chandramani S
Int J STD AIDS; 1996; 7(2):146-7. PubMed ID: 8737343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections by a monoclonal antibody direct immunofluorescence test.
Hossain A
J Trop Med Hyg; 1987 Dec; 90(6):307-10. PubMed ID: 3323545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of direct immunofluorescent staining and an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay for identifying Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical and urethral specimens.
Wiesmeier E; Bruckner DA; Malotte CK; Downie A
J Reprod Med; 1989 Aug; 34(8):517-9. PubMed ID: 2681749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of the variability of rapid diagnosis of infection by Chlamydia trachomatis using direct immunofluorescence].
Hernández Aguado I; Ruiz-Atienza L; Fernández García I; Fernández García E; Alvarez-Dardet C
Med Clin (Barc); 1990 Jan; 94(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 2186227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Chlamydia trachomatis and sterility].
Struzziero E; Corbo M
Minerva Ginecol; 1994 Nov; 46(11):607-8. PubMed ID: 7854564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Chlamydia trachomatis in patients with genital contact infections in Austria--studies of 3,367 patients].
Stary A; Söltz-Szöts J; Stary J; Gross W
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1986 Oct; 98(20):679-83. PubMed ID: 3538672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of 3 reagents of direct immunofluorescence in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis].
Guerra Infante FM; Flores Medina S; López Hurtado M; Sosa Gonzalez IE; Arredondo Garcia JL
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1994 Nov; 62():368-73. PubMed ID: 7821836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection by direct immunofluorescence staining of genital secretion.
Wiesmeier E; Bruckner D; Black M
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):347-9. PubMed ID: 3547210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of two enzyme immunoassays and an immunofluorescence test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Grillner L; Beckman S; Hammar H
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Oct; 5(5):559-62. PubMed ID: 3536502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Use of direct and serologic methods to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections in cervix uteri of women].
Kazanowska W; Zdrodowska-Stefanow B; Kuczyńska K
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1993; 45(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 8189809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Research in the relationship between Chlamydia and ureaplasma and infertility].
Yu P; Zhang L; Dai H; Cha G; Sun Y; Shu M
Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 1998; 23(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 10681801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in various pathological products. Comparison between direct IF-Chlamydiazyme and cultured cells].
Rouhan D; Le Noc P
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1987; 45(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 3304034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and culture techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Tabrizi SN; Lees MI; Garland SM
Mol Cell Probes; 1993 Oct; 7(5):357-60. PubMed ID: 8264669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The role of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women with urinary tract diseases].
Zdrodowska-Stefanow B; Darewicz B; Ostaszewska I; Puciło K
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 1997 Apr; 2(10):270-2. PubMed ID: 9377664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multicenter comparative evaluation of two rapid microscopic methods and culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in patient specimens.
Tilton RC; Judson FN; Barnes RC; Gruninger RP; Ryan RW; Steingrimsson O
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Feb; 26(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 3277994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sexually transmitted infections due to Chlamydia trachomatis: rapid detection by immunofluorescence microscopy.
Smith TF
Mayo Clin Proc; 1985 Mar; 60(3):204. PubMed ID: 3883064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
