These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3535161)

  • 61. Chlamydia trachomatis in a thin-prep Papanicolaou Test.
    Weisenberg E; Froula E; Tan B
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2001 Jul; 125(7):981. PubMed ID: 11419995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Sensitivity of mitomycin-C treated McCoy cells for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from genital specimens.
    Woodland RM; Kirton RP; Darougar S
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Dec; 6(6):653-6. PubMed ID: 3126059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Effect of polybrene on isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from clinical specimens.
    Sankar-Mistry P; Albota V; Knelsen B
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Oct; 22(4):671-3. PubMed ID: 3841128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Value of the Chlamydiazyme confirmatory assay.
    Mehl A; Nordbø SA; Ragnhildstveit E; Myrmel H; Samdal Vik IS
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Jan; 13(1):35-6. PubMed ID: 8168559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction.
    Griffais R; Thibon M
    Res Microbiol; 1989 Feb; 140(2):139-41. PubMed ID: 2678327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [Practical aids for the diagnosis of urogenital chlamydiosis].
    Stefánik M; Valkoun A
    Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 1988 Feb; 37(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 2967115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Detecting Chlamydia trachomatis by direct immunofluorescence using a Cytobrush sampling technique.
    Ciotti RA; Sondheimer SJ; Nachamkin I
    Genitourin Med; 1988 Aug; 64(4):245-6. PubMed ID: 3049302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [CME-ultrasonography 7/solution. Chlamydia peritonitis].
    Tuma J
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2005 Oct; 94(41):1611-4. PubMed ID: 16245639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Antigen detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from the endocervix is not enough for screening of perinatal complications.
    Numazaki K; Niida Y; Chiba S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 176(4):951-2. PubMed ID: 9125629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Comparison of sonicated and nonsonicated specimens for the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Warford AL; Carter TL; Levy RA; Rekrut KA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 May; 83(5):625-9. PubMed ID: 3887896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Culture versus direct specimen test: comparative study of infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in Viennese prostitutes.
    Stary A; Kopp W; Gebhart W; Söltz-Szöts J
    Genitourin Med; 1985 Aug; 61(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 3894215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Can a gynecologic Chlamydia trachomatis infection be diagnosed by direct observation of an endocervical plain slide?
    De Wilde RL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Sep; 159(3):786. PubMed ID: 3048107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Effect of differences in specimen processing and passage technique on recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Jones RB; Van Der Pol B; Katz BP
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 May; 27(5):894-8. PubMed ID: 2745697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. New enzyme immunoassay (Pharmacia) compared with MicroTrak (Syva) to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in genital tract specimens.
    Wyatt DE; Maw RD
    Genitourin Med; 1989 Jun; 65(3):199. PubMed ID: 2668156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Light and electron microscopic study of Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the uterine cervix.
    Swanson J; Eschenbach DA; Alexander ER; Holmes KK
    J Infect Dis; 1975 Jun; 131(6):678-87. PubMed ID: 1094072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in McCoy and HeLa-229 cells: an alternative staining technique using toluidine blue.
    Mohammed NR; Hillary IB
    J Clin Pathol; 1984 Jun; 37(6):682-5. PubMed ID: 6202722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Improved method for isolation and growth of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cells treated with cycloheximide using polyethylene glycol.
    Mohammed NR; Hillary IB
    J Clin Pathol; 1985 Sep; 38(9):1052-4. PubMed ID: 3900144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Conventional tissue culture compared with rapid immunofluorescence for identifying Chlamydia trachomatis in specimens from patients attending a genitourinary clinic.
    Teare EL; Sexton C; Lim F; McManus T; Cuttley AH; Hodgson J
    Genitourin Med; 1985 Dec; 61(6):379-82. PubMed ID: 3910545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Comparison of methods for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Ridgway GL; Oriel JD; Mumtaz G; Mellars B
    J Clin Pathol; 1986 Feb; 39(2):232-3. PubMed ID: 3512616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in a low prevalence population.
    Ostergaard L
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1995 May; 14(5):471-2. PubMed ID: 7556244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.