These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35352337)

  • 1. Domain selection and familywise error rate for functional data: A unified framework.
    Abramowicz K; Pini A; Schelin L; Sjöstedt de Luna S; Stamm A; Vantini S
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):1119-1132. PubMed ID: 35352337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Controlling the familywise error rate in widefield optical neuroimaging of functional connectivity in mice.
    White BR; Chan C; Adepoju T; Shinohara RT; Vandekar S
    Neurophotonics; 2023 Jan; 10(1):015004. PubMed ID: 36756004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cluster-level statistical inference in fMRI datasets: The unexpected behavior of random fields in high dimensions.
    Bansal R; Peterson BS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 49():101-115. PubMed ID: 29408478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A unified framework for finding differentially expressed genes from microarray experiments.
    Shaik JS; Yeasin M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 8():347. PubMed ID: 17877806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Online control of the familywise error rate.
    Tian J; Ramdas A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Apr; 30(4):976-993. PubMed ID: 33413033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple hypothesis testing to detect lineages under positive selection that affects only a few sites.
    Anisimova M; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 May; 24(5):1219-28. PubMed ID: 17339634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Univariate comparisons given aggregated normative data.
    Zadelaar JN; Agelink van Rentergem JA; Huizenga HM
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2017; 31(6-7):1155-1172. PubMed ID: 28679311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Rejection Principle for Sequential Tests of Multiple Hypotheses Controlling Familywise Error Rates.
    Bartroff J; Song J
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2016 Mar; 31(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 26985125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Familywise and per-family error rates of multiple comparison procedures.
    Lawrence J
    Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(19):3586-3598. PubMed ID: 31099904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On generalized fixed sequence procedures for controlling the FWER.
    Qiu Z; Guo W; Lynch G
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(30):3968-83. PubMed ID: 26228241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controlling the false discovery rate with constraints: the Newman-Keuls test revisited.
    Shaffer JP
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):136-43. PubMed ID: 17342955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applying the generalized partitioning principle to control the generalized familywise error rate.
    Xu H; Hsu J
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):52-67. PubMed ID: 17342949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A feature selection method for multivariate performance measures.
    Mao Q; Tsang IW
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2013 Sep; 35(9):2051-63. PubMed ID: 23868769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Partitioning to uncover conditions for permutation tests to control multiple testing error rates.
    Calian V; Li D; Hsu JC
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):756-66. PubMed ID: 18932135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flexible Multi-Step Hypothesis Testing of Human ECoG Data using Cluster-based Permutation Tests with GLMEs.
    König SD; Safo S; Miller K; Herman AB; Darrow DP
    bioRxiv; 2023 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 37034791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study on the unified model based multifactor dimensionality reduction methods for identifying gene-gene interactions associated with the survival phenotype.
    Lee JW; Lee S
    BioData Min; 2021 Mar; 14(1):17. PubMed ID: 33648540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Many tests of significance: new methods for controlling type I errors.
    Keselman HJ; Miller CW; Holland B
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Dec; 16(4):420-31. PubMed ID: 22040371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of random field theory and permutation methods for the statistical analysis of MEG data.
    Pantazis D; Nichols TE; Baillet S; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(2):383-94. PubMed ID: 15784416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.