These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35352363)
1. Feasibility and safety of left atrial posterior wall isolation with a new Cryoballoon technology in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Bisignani A; Pannone L; Miraglia V; Sieira J; Iacopino S; Bala G; Ströker E; Overeinder I; Almorad A; Gauthey A; Monaco C; Paparella G; Osório TG; Sorgente A; Jordaens L; Brugada P; Chierchia GB; Asmundis C Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2022 May; 45(5):605-611. PubMed ID: 35352363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation: Single-center safety and efficacy data using a novel cryoballoon technology compared to a historical balloon platform. Kochi AN; Moltrasio M; Tundo F; Riva S; Ascione C; Dessanai MA; Pizzamiglio F; Vettor G; Cellucci S; Gasperetti A; Tondo C; Fassini G J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):588-594. PubMed ID: 33537996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the PolarX and the Arctic Front cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (COMPARE CRYO) - Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Maurhofer J; Kueffer T; Knecht S; Madaffari A; Badertscher P; Seiler J; Krisai P; Jufer C; Asatryan B; Heg D; Servatius H; Tanner H; Kühne M; Roten L; Sticherling C; Reichlin T Contemp Clin Trials; 2023 Nov; 134():107341. PubMed ID: 37722483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The established and the challenger: A direct comparison of current cryoballoon technologies for pulmonary vein isolation. Moser F; Rottner L; Moser J; Schleberger R; Lemoine M; Münkler P; Dinshaw L; Kirchhof P; Reissmann B; Ouyang F; Rillig A; Metzner A J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 34766404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in the feasibility, anatomical parameters predicting procedural difficulty, and isolation area of a left atrial posterior wall isolation using radiofrequency versus cryoballoon catheters. Sakai S; Takitsume A; Soeda T; Kawata H; Nishida T; Watanabe M Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2023 Nov; 46(11):1393-1402. PubMed ID: 37708321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atrial fibrillation cryoablation is an effective day case treatment: the UK PolarX vs. Arctic Front Advance experience. Honarbakhsh S; Martin CA; Mesquita J; Herlekar R; Till R; Srinivasan NT; Duncan E; Leong F; Dulai R; Veasey R; Panikker S; Paisey J; Ramgopal B; Das M; Ahmed W; Sahu J; Earley MJ; Finlay MC; Schilling RJ; Hunter RJ Europace; 2023 Nov; 25(11):. PubMed ID: 37738643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First experience of POLARx™ versus Arctic Front Advance™: An early technology comparison. Creta A; Kanthasamy V; Schilling RJ; Rosengarten J; Khan F; Honarbakhsh S; Earley MJ; Hunter RJ; Finlay M J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Apr; 32(4):925-930. PubMed ID: 33590568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]