126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35353546)
1. Pre-Treatment Staging Imaging in Rectal Cancer: Results From the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.
Chen RC; Garrett-Mayer E; Kamal AH; Makhoul I; Kozlik MMP; Crist STS; Chiang AC;
JCO Oncol Pract; 2022 Aug; 18(8):e1367-e1373. PubMed ID: 35353546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care: improvements on colorectal cancer quality of care indicators during a 3-year interval.
Siegel EM; Jacobsen PB; Lee JH; Malafa M; Fulp W; Fletcher M; Smith JC; Brown R; Levine R; Cartwright T; Abesada-Terk G; Kim G; Alemany C; Faig D; Sharp P; Markham MJ; Shibata D
J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Jan; 218(1):16-25.e1-4. PubMed ID: 24275073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementing Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) participation in a community oncology practice.
Peterson J
J Registry Manag; 2012; 39(4):154-7. PubMed ID: 23493020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oral Chemotherapy Metric Performance in Quality Oncology Practice Initiative Practices: Updated Trends and Analysis.
Blinder VS; Garrett-Mayer E; Jacobsen PB; Kozlik MM; Markham MJ; Siegel RD; Kamal AH; Crist STS; Rosenthal J; Chiang AC
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2022 Oct; 20(10):1099-1106.e2. PubMed ID: 36240846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advancing performance measurement in oncology.
Campion FX; Larson LR; Kadlubek PJ; Earle CC; Neuss MN
Am J Manag Care; 2011 May; 17 Suppl 5 Developing():SP32-6. PubMed ID: 21711075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advancing performance measurement in oncology: quality oncology practice initiative participation and quality outcomes.
Campion FX; Larson LR; Kadlubek PJ; Earle CC; Neuss MN
J Oncol Pract; 2011 May; 7(3 Suppl):31s-5s. PubMed ID: 21886517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between surgeon characteristics and their preferences for guideline-concordant staging and treatment for rectal cancer.
Charlton ME; Mattingly-Wells LR; Marcet JE; McMahon Waldschmidt BC; Cromwell JW
Am J Surg; 2014 Nov; 208(5):817-823. PubMed ID: 24997492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How Is Rectal Cancer Managed: a Survey Exploring Current Practice Patterns in Canada.
Crawford A; Firtell J; Caycedo-Marulanda A
J Gastrointest Cancer; 2019 Jun; 50(2):260-268. PubMed ID: 29388060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.
Neuss MN; Desch CE; McNiff KK; Eisenberg PD; Gesme DH; Jacobson JO; Jahanzeb M; Padberg JJ; Rainey JM; Guo JJ; Simone JV
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Sep; 23(25):6233-9. PubMed ID: 16087948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) Measure Adherence Between Oncology Fellows, Advanced Practice Providers, and Attending Physicians.
Zhu J; Zhang T; Shah R; Kamal AH; Kelley MJ
J Cancer Educ; 2015 Dec; 30(4):774-8. PubMed ID: 25686787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Choosing Wisely in Oncology: Are We Ready For Value-Based Care?
Rocque G; Blayney DW; Jahanzeb M; Knape A; Markham MJ; Pham T; Shelton J; Sudheendra P; Evans T
J Oncol Pract; 2017 Nov; 13(11):e935-e943. PubMed ID: 28783425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modified Wong's classification improves the accuracy of rectal cancer staging by endorectal ultrasound and MRI.
Muñoz E; Granero-Castro P; Frasson M; Escartin J; Esclapez P; Campos S; Flor-Lorente B; Garcia-Granero E
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Dec; 56(12):1332-8. PubMed ID: 24201386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative at a university comprehensive cancer center.
Blayney DW; McNiff K; Hanauer D; Miela G; Markstrom D; Neuss M
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Aug; 27(23):3802-7. PubMed ID: 19487377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting management decisions in rectal cancer in clinical practice: results from a national survey.
Habr-Gama A; Perez RO; São Julião GP; Proscurshim I; Nahas SC; Gama-Rodrigues J
Tech Coloproctol; 2011 Mar; 15(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 21057971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oncology Pharmacist Opportunities: Closing the Gap in Quality Care.
Vulaj V; Hough S; Bedard L; Farris K; Mackler E
J Oncol Pract; 2018 Jun; 14(6):e403-e411. PubMed ID: 29298114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EUS versus magnetic resonance imaging in staging rectal adenocarcinoma: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
Chan BPH; Patel R; Mbuagbaw L; Thabane L; Yaghoobi M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Aug; 90(2):196-203.e1. PubMed ID: 31004599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for staging of early rectal cancers: how well does it work in practice?
Oien K; Forsmo HM; Rösler C; Nylund K; Waage JE; Pfeffer F
Acta Oncol; 2019; 58(sup1):S49-S54. PubMed ID: 30736712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Quality Oncology Practice Initiative Metrics in Solid Tumor Oncology Clinic With or Without Concomitant Supportive Oncology Consultation.
Rosenblum R; Huo R; Scarborough B; Goldstein N; Smith CB
J Oncol Pract; 2018 Dec; 14(12):e786-e793. PubMed ID: 30537452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of endorectal ultrasound versus pelvic magnetic resonance imaging for radiation treatment planning in locally advanced rectal cancer.
Yu E; DiPetrillo TA; Ramey S; Leonard KL
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(5):e451-e455. PubMed ID: 26055613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adherence to treatment guidelines in stage II/III rectal cancer in Alberta, Canada.
Eldin NS; Yasui Y; Scarfe A; Winget M
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2012 Feb; 24(1):e9-17. PubMed ID: 21802914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
