These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35353704)

  • 1. DeePromClass: Delineator for Eukaryotic Core Promoters Employing Deep Neural Networks.
    Kari H; Bandi SMS; Kumar A; Yella VR
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2023; 20(1):802-807. PubMed ID: 35353704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computational identification of eukaryotic promoters based on cascaded deep capsule neural networks.
    Zhu Y; Li F; Xiang D; Akutsu T; Song J; Jia C
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33227813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recognition of prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoters using convolutional deep learning neural networks.
    Umarov RK; Solovyev VV
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171410. PubMed ID: 28158264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prevalence of the initiator over the TATA box in human and yeast genes and identification of DNA motifs enriched in human TATA-less core promoters.
    Yang C; Bolotin E; Jiang T; Sladek FM; Martinez E
    Gene; 2007 Mar; 389(1):52-65. PubMed ID: 17123746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LeNup: learning nucleosome positioning from DNA sequences with improved convolutional neural networks.
    Zhang J; Peng W; Wang L
    Bioinformatics; 2018 May; 34(10):1705-1712. PubMed ID: 29329398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Delineation of the DNA Structural Features of Eukaryotic Core Promoter Classes.
    Vanaja A; Yella VR
    ACS Omega; 2022 Feb; 7(7):5657-5669. PubMed ID: 35224327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. iProm-Zea: A two-layer model to identify plant promoters and their types using convolutional neural network.
    Kim J; Shujaat M; Tayara H
    Genomics; 2022 May; 114(3):110384. PubMed ID: 35533969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of machine learning and deep learning techniques in promoter prediction across diverse species.
    Bhandari N; Khare S; Walambe R; Kotecha K
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e365. PubMed ID: 33817015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. TSS seq based core promoter architecture in blood feeding Tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans morsitans) vector of Trypanosomiasis.
    Mwangi S; Attardo G; Suzuki Y; Aksoy S; Christoffels A
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Sep; 16(1):722. PubMed ID: 26394619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determinants of promoter and enhancer transcription directionality in metazoans.
    Ibrahim MM; Karabacak A; Glahs A; Kolundzic E; Hirsekorn A; Carda A; Tursun B; Zinzen RP; Lacadie SA; Ohler U
    Nat Commun; 2018 Oct; 9(1):4472. PubMed ID: 30367057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. iPTT(2 L)-CNN: A Two-Layer Predictor for Identifying Promoters and Their Types in Plant Genomes by Convolutional Neural Network.
    Sun A; Xiao X; Xu Z
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2021; 2021():6636350. PubMed ID: 33488763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DNA tracts composed of only two bases concentrate in gene promoters.
    Yagil G
    Genomics; 2006 May; 87(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 16442774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classification of Promoters Based on the Combination of Core Promoter Elements Exhibits Different Histone Modification Patterns.
    Natsume-Kitatani Y; Mamitsuka H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151917. PubMed ID: 27003446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Critical assessment of computational tools for prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoter prediction.
    Zhang M; Jia C; Li F; Li C; Zhu Y; Akutsu T; Webb GI; Zou Q; Coin LJM; Song J
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 Mar; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 35021193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of a time-delay neural network to promoter annotation in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.
    Reese MG
    Comput Chem; 2001 Dec; 26(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 11765852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transcription factor binding site positioning in yeast: proximal promoter motifs characterize TATA-less promoters.
    Erb I; van Nimwegen E
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e24279. PubMed ID: 21931670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational analysis of core promoters in the Drosophila genome.
    Ohler U; Liao GC; Niemann H; Rubin GM
    Genome Biol; 2002; 3(12):RESEARCH0087. PubMed ID: 12537576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational identification and experimental characterization of preferred downstream positions in human core promoters.
    Dreos R; Sloutskin A; Malachi N; Ideses D; Bucher P; Juven-Gershon T
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1009256. PubMed ID: 34383743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of core promoter modules in Drosophila and their application in accurate transcription start site prediction.
    Ohler U
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2006; 34(20):5943-50. PubMed ID: 17068082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eukaryotic genomes may exhibit up to 10 generic classes of gene promoters.
    Gagniuc P; Ionescu-Tirgoviste C
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Sep; 13():512. PubMed ID: 23020586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.