These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35353958)

  • 1. A quantitative approach to the choice of number of samples for percentile estimation in bootstrap and visual predictive check analyses.
    Jonsson EN; Nyberg J
    CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol; 2022 Jun; 11(6):673-686. PubMed ID: 35353958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation.
    Briggs AH; Wonderling DE; Mooney CZ
    Health Econ; 1997; 6(4):327-40. PubMed ID: 9285227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
    Zhao Y; Frey HC
    Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimating uncertainty of parameters in linear mixed-effects models.
    Thai HT; Mentré F; Holford NH; Veyrat-Follet C; Comets E
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):129-40. PubMed ID: 23457061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A bootstrap approach for assessing the uncertainty of outcome probabilities when using a scoring system.
    Cevenini G; Barbini P
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2010 Aug; 10():45. PubMed ID: 20796275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conditional Non-parametric Bootstrap for Non-linear Mixed Effect Models.
    Comets E; Rodrigues C; Jullien V; Ursino M
    Pharm Res; 2021 Jun; 38(6):1057-1066. PubMed ID: 34075519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Regression Approach to Visual Predictive Checks for Population Pharmacometric Models.
    Jamsen KM; Patel K; Nieforth K; Kirkpatrick CMJ
    CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol; 2018 Oct; 7(10):678-686. PubMed ID: 30058222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive choice of the number of bootstrap samples in large scale multiple testing.
    Guo W; Peddada S
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article13. PubMed ID: 18384266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. dOFV distributions: a new diagnostic for the adequacy of parameter uncertainty in nonlinear mixed-effects models applied to the bootstrap.
    Dosne AG; Niebecker R; Karlsson MO
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Dec; 43(6):597-608. PubMed ID: 27730481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phxnlme: An R package that facilitates pharmacometric workflow of Phoenix NLME analyses.
    Lim CN; Liang S; Feng K; Chittenden J; Henry A; Mouksassi S; Birnbaum AK
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Mar; 140():121-129. PubMed ID: 28254068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of the bootstrap in analysing cost data from cluster randomised trials: some simulation results.
    Flynn TN; Peters TJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):33. PubMed ID: 15550169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence synthesis for decision making 6: embedding evidence synthesis in probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Dias S; Sutton AJ; Welton NJ; Ades AE
    Med Decis Making; 2013 Jul; 33(5):671-8. PubMed ID: 23804510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impacts of Regulations on Air Quality and Emergency Department Visits in the Atlanta Metropolitan Area, 1999-2013.
    Russell AG; Tolbert P; Henneman L; Abrams J; Liu C; Klein M; Mulholland J; Sarnat SE; Hu Y; Chang HH; Odman T; Strickland MJ; Shen H; Lawal A
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2018 Apr; 2018(195):1-93. PubMed ID: 31883240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving the estimation of parameter uncertainty distributions in nonlinear mixed effects models using sampling importance resampling.
    Dosne AG; Bergstrand M; Harling K; Karlsson MO
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Dec; 43(6):583-596. PubMed ID: 27730482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two bootstrapping routines for obtaining imprecision estimates for nonparametric parameter distributions in nonlinear mixed effects models.
    Baverel PG; Savic RM; Karlsson MO
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2011 Feb; 38(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 21076858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. RESEARCH: Assessing Uncertainty in Estimates of Nitrogen Loading to Estuaries for Research, Planning, and Risk Assessment.
    Collins G; Kremer JN; Valiela I
    Environ Manage; 2000 Jun; 25(6):635-645. PubMed ID: 10790528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the use of bootstrapping in cohort studies conducted with 1:1 propensity score matching-A plasmode simulation study.
    Desai RJ; Wyss R; Abdia Y; Toh S; Johnson M; Lee H; Karami S; Major JM; Nguyen M; Wang SV; Franklin JM; Gagne JJ
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Jun; 28(6):879-886. PubMed ID: 31020732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating inestimable standard errors in population pharmacokinetic studies: the bootstrap with Winsorization.
    Ette EI; Onyiah LC
    Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2002; 27(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 12365204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An automated sampling importance resampling procedure for estimating parameter uncertainty.
    Dosne AG; Bergstrand M; Karlsson MO
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2017 Dec; 44(6):509-520. PubMed ID: 28887735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.