These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35354780)

  • 21. Large volume inside the cage leading incomplete interbody bone fusion and residual back pain after posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Takeuchi M; Kamiya M; Wakao N; Hirasawa A; Kawanami K; Osuka K; Takayasu M
    Neurosurg Rev; 2015 Jul; 38(3):573-8; discussion 578. PubMed ID: 25666390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study.
    Sakaura H; Miwa T; Yamashita T; Kuroda Y; Ohwada T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):591-595. PubMed ID: 27231813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparing stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision of rostral adjacent segment disease: A STROBE-compliant study.
    Zhu G; Hao Y; Yu L; Cai Y; Yang X
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(40):e12680. PubMed ID: 30290656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surgical outcomes of two kinds of demineralized bone matrix putties/local autograft composites in instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion.
    Chang DG; Park JB; Han Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Feb; 22(1):200. PubMed ID: 33596888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Radiological comparison of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion with one or two closed-box plasmapore coated titanium cages: follow-up study over more than seven years.
    Kroppenstedt S; Gulde M; Schönmayr R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(19):2083-8. PubMed ID: 18758364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical outcomes of lumbar degenerative disc disease treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion allograft spacer: a prospective, multicenter trial with 2-year follow-up.
    Arnold PM; Robbins S; Paullus W; Faust S; Holt R; McGuire R
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2009 Jul; 38(7):E115-22. PubMed ID: 19714280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surgical outcomes after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional trajectory screw fixation or cortical bone trajectory screw fixation: A comparative study between the polyetheretherketone cage and the same shape titanium-coated polyetheretherketone cage.
    Sakaura H; Ikegami D; Fujimori T; Sugiura T; Yamada S; Mukai Y
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 209():106945. PubMed ID: 34555798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prospective Study of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Either Interbody Graft or Interbody Cage in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Sivaraman A; Altaf F; Jalgaonkar A; Kakkar R; Sirigiri PB; Howieson A; Crawford RJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Oct; 28(8):E467-71. PubMed ID: 23839022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Long-Term Follow-up, Multicenter, Comparative Study of the Radiologic, and Clinical Results Between a CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 Bioactive Glass Ceramics (BGS-7) Intervertebral Spacer and Titanium Cage in 1-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Lee JH; Kim SK; Kang SS; Han SJ; Lee CK; Chang BS
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Aug; 33(7):E322-E329. PubMed ID: 32080009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion.
    Marchi L; Abdala N; Oliveira L; Amaral R; Coutinho E; Pimenta L
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jul; 19(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 23662890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segmental lumbar degenerative diseases.
    He LM; Chen KT; Chen CM; Chang Q; Sun L; Zhang YN; Chang JJ; Feng HY
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Apr; 23(1):329. PubMed ID: 35392878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative study of radiographic disc height changes using two different interbody devices for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: open box vs. fenestrated tube interbody cage.
    Matsumura A; Taneichi H; Suda K; Kajino T; Moridaira H; Kaneda K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(23):E871-6. PubMed ID: 17077723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of fusion rate and clinical results between CaO-SiO
    Lee JH; Kong CB; Yang JJ; Shim HJ; Koo KH; Kim J; Lee CK; Chang BS
    Spine J; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1367-1376. PubMed ID: 27498334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [PRELIMINARY EFFECTIVENESS OF POLYAMINOACID/NANO-HYDROXYAPATITE/CALCIUM SULFATE CAGE IN LUMBAR FUSION SURGERY].
    Ma L; Jia Y; Li T; Liu L; Gong Q; Liu H; Zeng J; Zhou Z; Ma L
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 30(3):328-35. PubMed ID: 27281879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical Outcomes of Posterolateral Fusion vs. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Instability.
    Farrokhi MR; Yadollahikhales G; Gholami M; Mousavi SR; Mesbahi AR; Asadi-Pooya AA
    Pain Physician; 2018 Jul; 21(4):383-406. PubMed ID: 30045595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Topping-off surgery vs posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a comparative study of clinical efficacy and adjacent segment degeneration.
    Li D; Hai Y; Meng X; Yang J; Yin P
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Jun; 14(1):197. PubMed ID: 31253158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Synthetic Bone Graft versus Autograft Obtained from the Spinous Process in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Cakir T; Yolas C
    Turk Neurosurg; 2021; 31(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 33575994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effectiveness and safety of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 versus local bone graft in primary lumbar interbody fusions.
    Adams CL; Ogden K; Robertson IK; Broadhurst S; Edis D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 24153173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Short-term outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion without decompression for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5.
    Campbell PG; Nunley PD; Cavanaugh D; Kerr E; Utter PA; Frank K; Stone M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E6. PubMed ID: 29290128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dynamic stabilization using the Dynesys system versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal disease: a clinical and radiological outcomes-based meta-analysis.
    Lee CH; Jahng TA; Hyun SJ; Kim CH; Park SB; Kim KJ; Chung CK; Kim HJ; Lee SE
    Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E7. PubMed ID: 26721581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.