These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35355168)

  • 1. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure are altered in silicone-hydrogel soft contact lenses wearers.
    Marcellán MC; Remón L; Ávila FJ
    Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 42(9):2801-2809. PubMed ID: 35355168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic contour tonometry over silicone hydrogel contact lens.
    Lam AK; Tse JS
    J Optom; 2014; 7(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 24766866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis during corneal swelling induced by contact lens wear with eye closure.
    Lu F; Xu S; Qu J; Shen M; Wang X; Fang H; Wang J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):616-22. PubMed ID: 17306755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in corneal biomechanical properties after 24 hours of continuous intraocular pressure monitoring using a contact lens sensor.
    Morales-Fernandez L; Garcia-Bella J; Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Sanchez-Jean R; Saenz-Frances F; Arriola-Villalobos P; Perucho L; Santos-Bueso E; Garcia-Feijoo J
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 53(3):236-241. PubMed ID: 29784159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
    Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer.
    Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Pourjavan S
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of potential impact factors of corneal biomechanics in myopia.
    Du Y; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Li T; Wang J; Du Z
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 23(1):143. PubMed ID: 37024820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure].
    Hager A; Schroeder B; Sadeghi M; Grossherr M; Wiegand W
    Ophthalmologe; 2007 Jun; 104(6):484-9. PubMed ID: 17587093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Topographic and biomechanical evaluation of cornea in patients with acromegaly.
    Altinkaynak H; Duru N; Ersoy R; Kalkan Akcay E; Ugurlu N; Cagil N; Cakir B
    Cornea; 2015 Jan; 34(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 25379870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corneal biomechanical properties after soft contact lens wear measured on a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer: A before and after study.
    Peyman A; Ghoreishi M; Hashemi-Estabragh SS; Mirmohammadkhani M; Mohammadinia M; Pourazizi M
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2021 Mar; 44(3):391-396. PubMed ID: 33618908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraocular pressure and biomechanical corneal properties measure by ocular response analyser in patients with primary congenital glaucoma.
    Perucho-González L; Martínez de la Casa JM; Morales-Fernández L; Bañeros-Rojas P; Saenz-Francés F; García-Feijoó J
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e293-7. PubMed ID: 26647905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
    Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Changes in biomechanical properties of the ocular fibrous tunic in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma in response to drug-induced stress-relief tests].
    Makashova NV; Vasilyeva AE
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2017; 133(4):31-36. PubMed ID: 28980563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical parameters of the cornea measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer in normal eyes.
    Kotecha A; Russell RA; Sinapis A; Pourjavan S; Sinapis D; Garway-Heath DF
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 14():11. PubMed ID: 24479520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of dehydration and fasting on intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer.
    Uysal BS; Duru N; Ozen U; Arikan Yorgun M; Akcay E; Caglayan M; Cagil N
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):451-457. PubMed ID: 28255839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Oh JH; Yoo C; Kim YY; Kim HM; Song JS
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 247(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 18843499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
    Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer.
    Brown L; Foulsham W; Pronin S; Tatham AJ
    J Glaucoma; 2018 Jun; 27(6):511-518. PubMed ID: 29557828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using an ocular response analyser to examine aphakic and pseudophakic patients after congenital cataract surgery.
    Simsek T; Soba DO; Tırhış MH; Yılmazbaş P; Öztürk F
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 94(3):e198-203. PubMed ID: 26521752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.