These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35356520)
1. Tree Species Diversity and Forest Edge Density Jointly Shape the Gut Microbiota Composition in Juvenile Great Tits ( Goossens E; Boonyarittichaikij R; Dekeukeleire D; Hertzog L; Van Praet S; Pasmans F; Bonte D; Verheyen K; Lens L; Martel A; Verbrugghe E Front Microbiol; 2022; 13():790189. PubMed ID: 35356520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A time-lagged association between the gut microbiome, nestling weight and nestling survival in wild great tits. Davidson GL; Somers SE; Wiley N; Johnson CN; Reichert MS; Ross RP; Stanton C; Quinn JL J Anim Ecol; 2021 Apr; 90(4):989-1003. PubMed ID: 33481278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamics of Gut Microbiota Diversity During the Early Development of an Avian Host: Evidence From a Cross-Foster Experiment. Teyssier A; Lens L; Matthysen E; White J Front Microbiol; 2018; 9():1524. PubMed ID: 30038608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. No evidence for associations between brood size, gut microbiome diversity and survival in great tit (Parus major) nestlings. Liukkonen M; Hukkanen M; Cossin-Sevrin N; Stier A; Vesterinen E; Grond K; Ruuskanen S Anim Microbiome; 2023 Mar; 5(1):19. PubMed ID: 36949549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pollution-related changes in nest microbiota: Implications for growth and fledging in three passerine birds. Leino LI; Vesterinen EJ; Sánchez-Virosta P; Puigbò P; Eeva T; Rainio MJ Environ Pollut; 2024 Sep; 357():124434. PubMed ID: 38936789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mitigating the impact of microbial pressure on great (Parus major) and blue (Cyanistes caeruleus) tit hatching success through maternal immune investment. Boonyarittichaikij R; Verbrugghe E; Dekeukeleire D; Strubbe D; Van Praet S; De Beelde R; Rouffaer L; Pasmans F; Bonte D; Verheyen K; Lens L; Martel A PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204022. PubMed ID: 30286089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physiological condition of nestling great tits Glądalski M; Kaliński A; Wawrzyniak J; Bańbura M; Markowski M; Skwarska J; Bańbura J Conserv Physiol; 2018; 6(1):coy062. PubMed ID: 30483402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploring the faecal microbiome of the Eurasian nuthatch (Sitta europaea). Goossens E; Boonyarittichaikij R; Dekeukeleire D; Van Praet S; Bonte D; Verheyen K; Lens L; Martel A; Verbrugghe E Arch Microbiol; 2021 Jul; 203(5):2119-2127. PubMed ID: 33606040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Indirect maternal effects via nest microbiome composition drive gut colonization in altricial chicks. Diez-Méndez D; Bodawatta KH; Freiberga I; Klečková I; Jønsson KA; Poulsen M; Sam K Mol Ecol; 2023 Jul; 32(13):3657-3671. PubMed ID: 37096441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of habitat fragmentation on provisioning rates, diet and breeding success in two species of tit (great tit and blue tit). Nour N; Currie D; Matthysen E; Van Damme R; Dhondt AA Oecologia; 1998 May; 114(4):522-530. PubMed ID: 28307901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nest building in titmice Paridae: Selectivity in bryophyte use. Rydgren K; Indreeide B; Slagsvold T; Lampe HM Ecol Evol; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e9852. PubMed ID: 36911310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does nest occupancy by birds influence the microbial composition? Xin J; Cao H; Bao X; Hu C Front Microbiol; 2023; 14():1232208. PubMed ID: 38053547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Forest fragmentation modulates effects of tree species richness and composition on ecosystem multifunctionality. Hertzog LR; Boonyarittichaikij R; Dekeukeleire D; de Groote SRE; van Schrojenstein Lantman IM; Sercu BK; Smith HK; de la Peña E; Vandegehuchte ML; Bonte D; Martel A; Verheyen K; Lens L; Baeten L Ecology; 2019 Apr; 100(4):e02653. PubMed ID: 30870588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of nest temperature on growth and survival in juvenile Great Tits Corregidor-Castro A; Jones OR Ecol Evol; 2021 Jun; 11(12):7346-7353. PubMed ID: 34188817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Habitats Show More Impacts Than Host Species in Shaping Gut Microbiota of Sympatric Rodent Species in a Fragmented Forest. Teng Y; Yang X; Li G; Zhu Y; Zhang Z Front Microbiol; 2022; 13():811990. PubMed ID: 35197954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cloacal swabs and alcohol bird specimens are good proxies for compositional analyses of gut microbial communities of Great tits (Parus major). Bodawatta KH; Puzejova K; Sam K; Poulsen M; Jønsson KA Anim Microbiome; 2020 Mar; 2(1):9. PubMed ID: 33499943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individual variation in the avian gut microbiota: The influence of host state and environmental heterogeneity. Somers SE; Davidson GL; Johnson CN; Reichert MS; Crane JMS; Ross RP; Stanton C; Quinn JL Mol Ecol; 2023 Jun; 32(12):3322-3339. PubMed ID: 36906957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Channel Catfish and Blue Catfish Gut Microbiota Assemblages Shows Minimal Effects of Host Genetics on Microbial Structure and Inferred Function. Bledsoe JW; Waldbieser GC; Swanson KS; Peterson BC; Small BC Front Microbiol; 2018; 9():1073. PubMed ID: 29875764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fish Skin and Gut Microbiomes Show Contrasting Signatures of Host Species and Habitat. Sylvain FÉ; Holland A; Bouslama S; Audet-Gilbert É; Lavoie C; Val AL; Derome N Appl Environ Microbiol; 2020 Aug; 86(16):. PubMed ID: 32503908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]