BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35357881)

  • 1. The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: Reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity.
    Gray K; MacCormack JK; Henry T; Banks E; Schein C; Armstrong-Carter E; Abrams S; Muscatell KA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Dec; 123(6):1199-1222. PubMed ID: 35357881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Harm mediates the disgust-immorality link.
    Schein C; Ritter RS; Gray K
    Emotion; 2016 Sep; 16(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 27100369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm.
    Schein C; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2018 Feb; 22(1):32-70. PubMed ID: 28504021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Moral Judgments of COVID-19 Social Distancing Violations: The Roles of Perceived Harm and Impurity.
    Rosenfeld DL; Tomiyama AJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 May; 48(5):766-781. PubMed ID: 34247528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Problem of Purity in Moral Psychology.
    Gray K; DiMaggio N; Schein C; Kachanoff F
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2023 Aug; 27(3):272-308. PubMed ID: 36314693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Unifying Moral Dyad: Liberals and Conservatives Share the Same Harm-Based Moral Template.
    Schein C; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1147-63. PubMed ID: 26091912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relevance of moral norms in distinct relational contexts: Purity versus harm norms regulate self-directed actions.
    Dungan JA; Chakroff A; Young L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173405. PubMed ID: 28278214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No Absolutism Here: Harm Predicts Moral Judgment 30× Better Than Disgust-Commentary on Scott, Inbar, & Rozin (2016).
    Gray K; Schein C
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 May; 11(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 27217244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disgust as embodied moral judgment.
    Schnall S; Haidt J; Clore GL; Jordan AH
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1096-109. PubMed ID: 18505801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unfounded dumbfounding: How harm and purity undermine evidence for moral dumbfounding.
    Guglielmo S
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():334-337. PubMed ID: 28803616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Many moral buttons or just one? Evidence from emotional facial expressions.
    Franchin L; Geipel J; Hadjichristidis C; Surian L
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Aug; 33(5):943-958. PubMed ID: 30200861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition: Automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering.
    Gray K; Schein C; Ward AF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Aug; 143(4):1600-15. PubMed ID: 24635184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tainting the soul: purity concerns predict moral judgments of suicide.
    Rottman J; Kelemen D; Young L
    Cognition; 2014 Feb; 130(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 24333538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The physiological basis of psychological disgust and moral judgments.
    Tracy JL; Steckler CM; Heltzel G
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Jan; 116(1):15-32. PubMed ID: 30596444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emotions in sexual morality: testing the separate elicitors of anger and disgust.
    Giner-Sorolla R; Bosson JK; Caswell TA; Hettinger VE
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(7):1208-22. PubMed ID: 22414214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A constructionist review of morality and emotions: no evidence for specific links between moral content and discrete emotions.
    Cameron CD; Lindquist KA; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2015 Nov; 19(4):371-94. PubMed ID: 25587050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Moralization Through Moral Shock: Exploring Emotional Antecedents to Moral Conviction.
    Wisneski DC; Skitka LJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Feb; 43(2):139-150. PubMed ID: 27872393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Moral anger, but not moral disgust, responds to intentionality.
    Russell PS; Giner-Sorolla R
    Emotion; 2011 Apr; 11(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 21500892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incidental disgust does not cause moral condemnation of neutral actions.
    Jylkkä J; Härkönen J; Hyönä J
    Cogn Emot; 2021 Feb; 35(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 32840184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disgust sensitivity is primarily associated with purity-based moral judgments.
    Wagemans FMA; Brandt MJ; Zeelenberg M
    Emotion; 2018 Mar; 18(2):277-289. PubMed ID: 28872334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.