These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35358074)

  • 1. Energy and reliability analysis of wastewater treatment plants in small communities in Ontario.
    Hamza R; Hamoda MF; Elassar M
    Water Sci Technol; 2022 Mar; 85(6):1824-1839. PubMed ID: 35358074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Energy efficiency assessment of China wastewater treatment plants by unit energy consumption per kg COD removed.
    Li J; Tang WZ; Gu L
    Environ Technol; 2023 Jan; 44(2):278-292. PubMed ID: 34397318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Odor emission assessment of different WWTPs with Extended Aeration Activated Sludge and Rotating Biological Contactor technologies in the province of Cordoba (Spain).
    Ruiz-Muñoz A; Siles JA; Márquez P; Toledo M; Gutiérrez MC; Martín MA
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 326(Pt A):116741. PubMed ID: 36399884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of 14 full-scale sewage treatment plants: comparison between four aerobic technologies regarding effluent quality, sludge production and energy consumption.
    Vera I; Sáez K; Vidal G
    Environ Technol; 2013; 34(13-16):2267-75. PubMed ID: 24350481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current state of sewage treatment in China.
    Jin L; Zhang G; Tian H
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 66():85-98. PubMed ID: 25189479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Energy audit in small wastewater treatment plants: methodology, energy consumption indicators, and lessons learned.
    Foladori P; Vaccari M; Vitali F
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 72(6):1007-15. PubMed ID: 26360762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability and process capability assessment of suspended growth sewage treatment plant in Melaka, Malaysia.
    Ishak A; Mohamad E; Hambali A; Johari NL
    Water Sci Technol; 2022 Nov; 86(9):2233-2247. PubMed ID: 36378177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current operation state of wastewater treatment plants in urban China.
    Zhang J; Shao Y; Wang H; Liu G; Qi L; Xu X; Liu S
    Environ Res; 2021 Apr; 195():110843. PubMed ID: 33548300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Operating costs and energy demand of wastewater treatment plants in Austria: benchmarking results of the last 10 years.
    Haslinger J; Lindtner S; Krampe J
    Water Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 74(11):2620-2626. PubMed ID: 27973366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Supersaturated-oxygen aeration effects on a high-loaded membrane bioreactor (HL-MBR): Biological performance and microbial population dynamics.
    Kim SY; Lopez-Vazquez CM; Curko J; Matosic M; Svetec IK; Štafa A; Milligan C; Herrera A; Maestre JP; Kinney KA; Brdjanovic D; Garcia HA
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 771():144847. PubMed ID: 33548701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the dynamic performance of wastewater treatment systems: A metafrontier Malmquist productivity index approach.
    Molinos-Senante M; Hernández-Sancho F; Sala-Garrido R
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Sep; 161():309-316. PubMed ID: 26197425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Whole effluent toxicity (WET) tests on wastewater treatment plants with Daphnia magna and Selenastrum capricornutum.
    Ra JS; Kim HK; Chang NI; Kim SD
    Environ Monit Assess; 2007 Jun; 129(1-3):107-13. PubMed ID: 17106776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sludge dewatering and disposal practices for small activated sludge wastewater treatment plants.
    Hatziconstantinou GJ; Efstathiou H
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2003; 38(10):2401-12. PubMed ID: 14524692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance comparison of a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor and a full-scale sequencing batch reactor with sand filtration: treatment of low strength wastewater from a northern Canadian Aboriginal Community.
    Frederickson K; Cicek N
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):483-90. PubMed ID: 16004011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integration of a microbial fuel cell with activated sludge process for energy-saving wastewater treatment: taking a sequencing batch reactor as an example.
    Liu XW; Wang YP; Huang YX; Sun XF; Sheng GP; Zeng RJ; Li F; Dong F; Wang SG; Tong ZH; Yu HQ
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2011 Jun; 108(6):1260-7. PubMed ID: 21290383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability analysis of wastewater treatment plants.
    Oliveira SC; Von Sperling M
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(4-5):1182-94. PubMed ID: 17897694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parametric optimization of domestic wastewater treatment in an activated sludge sequencing batch reactor using response surface methodology.
    Estrada-Vázquez C; Salinas-Pacheco A; Peralta-Reyes E; Poggi-Varaldo HM; Regalado-Méndez A
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2019; 54(12):1197-1205. PubMed ID: 31533526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Upgrading sequencing batch reactor using attached biofilm.
    Abdelaziz HA; Fouad M; Mossad M
    Water Environ Res; 2021 Sep; 93(9):1700-1713. PubMed ID: 33720481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pitfalls in international benchmarking of energy intensity across wastewater treatment utilities.
    Walker NL; Williams AP; Styles D
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Dec; 300():113613. PubMed ID: 34560465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.