433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35358659)
1. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner.
Revilla-León M; Young K; Sicilia E; Cho SH; Kois JC
J Dent; 2022 May; 120():104114. PubMed ID: 35358659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of type of restorative materials and surface wetness conditions on intraoral scanning accuracy.
Agustín-Panadero R; Moreno DM; Pérez-Barquero JA; Fernández-Estevan L; Gómez-Polo M; Revilla-León M
J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104521. PubMed ID: 37061118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures and immediate dentin sealing on the scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners.
Revilla-León M; Cascos-Sánchez R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Gómez-Polo M
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104431. PubMed ID: 36682722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vivo study.
Revilla-León M; Quesada-Olmo N; Gómez-Polo M; Sicilia E; Farjas-Abadia M; Kois JC
J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103851. PubMed ID: 34656658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the Number of Teeth and Location of the Virtual Occlusal Record on the Accuracy of the Maxillo-Mandibular Relationship Obtained by Using An Intraoral Scanner.
Revilla-León M; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Barmak AB; Att W; Kois JC
J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):253-258. PubMed ID: 35448911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study.
Gómez-Polo M; Piedra-Cascón W; Methani MM; Quesada-Olmo N; Farjas-Abadia M; Revilla-León M
J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103690. PubMed ID: 33991598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digitization accuracy and scannability of different prosthodontic materials: An in vitro trial.
Emam NS; Khamis MM; Abdelhamid AM; Ezzelarab S
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; 130(2):252.e1-252.e8. PubMed ID: 37468368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of the effects of cutting off, overlapping, and rescanning procedures on intraoral scanning accuracy.
Revilla-León M; Sicilia E; Agustín-Panadero R; Gómez-Polo M; Kois JC
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):746-754. PubMed ID: 34998582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of substrate adjacent to the scan region on the trueness of four intraoral scanners: An in vitro study.
Elter B; Tak Ö
J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104729. PubMed ID: 37778497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].
Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study.
Osman RB; Alharbi NM
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(9):821-828. PubMed ID: 36571837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner.
Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.
Ma B; Yue X; Sun Y; Peng L; Geng W
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the accuracy of 2 digital intraoral scanners: A 3D analysis study.
Alzahrani SJ; El-Hammali H; Morgano SM; Elkassaby H
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):787-792. PubMed ID: 33172647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of occlusal collision corrections completed by two intraoral scanners or a dental design program on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship.
Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Yilmaz B; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):191-203. PubMed ID: 37365066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study.
Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of arch location and scanning pattern on the scanning accuracy, scanning time, and number of photograms of complete-arch intraoral digital implant scans.
Gómez-Polo M; Cascos R; Ortega R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jun; 34(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 37052054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of interdental spaces and the palate on the accuracy of maxillary scans acquired using different intraoral scanners.
Akl MA; Daifallah K; Pérez-Barquero JA; Barmak AB; Wee AG; Revilla-León M
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):125-134. PubMed ID: 37591814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of the dental arch and number of cutting-off and rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of implant scans in partially edentulous situations.
Gómez-Polo M; Immorlano MG; Cascos-Sánchez R; Ortega R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104667. PubMed ID: 37595865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
