These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35359088)
1. [Clinical value of routine contrast esophagram in the diagnosis of anastomotic leakage for three-incision esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis]. Duan XF; He LH; Shang XB; Yue J; Ma Z; Chen CG; Zhang C; Qu DW; Jiang HJ Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 May; 60(5):461-465. PubMed ID: 35359088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis. Gao C; Xu G; Wang C; Wang D J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(1):46. PubMed ID: 30819240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management and outcomes of anastomotic leakage after McKeown esophagectomy: A retrospective analysis of 749 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer. Duan X; Bai W; Ma Z; Yue J; Shang X; Jiang H; Yu Z Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():304-309. PubMed ID: 32891347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Diagnostic Value of Routine Contrast Esophagram in Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy. Hu Z; Wang X; An X; Li W; Feng Y; You Z World J Surg; 2017 Aug; 41(8):2062-2067. PubMed ID: 28255626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Routine Radiologic Assessment for Anastomotic Leak Is Not Necessary in Asymptomatic Patients After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. Kang H; Ben-David K; Sarosi GA; Thomas RM J Gastrointest Surg; 2022 Feb; 26(2):279-285. PubMed ID: 35037179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modified layered hand-sewn cervical end-to-side anastomosis for minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy. Cheng L; Fu S; Liu J; Wang Z; Fu M J Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 124(7):1031-1039. PubMed ID: 34309871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Risk factors of cervical anastomotic leakage after thoracoscopic-lapacoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal carcinoma]. Zhao ZR; Feng H; Ma SR; Wang YC; Ma Q; Zhao GF; Zhang XL; Bai HJ; Zhao L Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 41(6):460-465. PubMed ID: 31216834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Fibrin Sealant in Prevention of Cervical Anastomotic Leakage After McKeown Esophagectomy: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study. Huang Y; Hu Y; Lin Y; Fu J; Wu J; Fang C; Liu M; Hong Y Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Oct; 28(11):6390-6397. PubMed ID: 33786677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Management and outcome of cervical versus intrathoracic manifestation of cervical anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. van Rossum PSN; Haverkamp L; Carvello M; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26919029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical features and risk factors of anastomotic leakage after radical esophagectomy]. Chen C; Yu Z; Jin Q; Zhang X Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Jul; 53(7):518-21. PubMed ID: 26359075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability of cervical esophagogastrostomy via hand-sewn anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Akiyama Y; Iwaya T; Endo F; Shioi Y; Chiba T; Takahara T; Otsuka K; Nitta H; Koeda K; Mizuno M; Kimura Y; Sasaki A Dis Esophagus; 2017 May; 30(5):1-7. PubMed ID: 28375439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture. Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Routine Radiologic Contrast Agent Examination After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Is Not Useful. Struecker B; Chopra S; Heilmann AC; Spenke J; Denecke C; Sauer IM; Bahra M; Pratschke J; Andreou A; Biebl M J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 May; 21(5):801-806. PubMed ID: 28205124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Application of gastroepiploic tunnel esophagogastrostomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy]. Zhou L; Ge P; Chen J; Wang J; Wang M; Li X; Jiang T Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1021-1024. PubMed ID: 27680071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does Routine Endoscopy or Contrast Swallow Study After Esophagectomy and Gastric Tube Reconstruction Change Patient Management? Nederlof N; de Jonge J; de Vringer T; Tran TC; Spaander MC; Tilanus HW; Wijnhoven BP J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 Feb; 21(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 27844264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study. Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic value of inflammatory markers for detecting anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection. Liesenfeld LF; Sauer P; Diener MK; Hinz U; Schmidt T; Müller-Stich BP; Hackert T; Büchler MW; Schaible A BMC Surg; 2020 Dec; 20(1):324. PubMed ID: 33298038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic value of drain amylase for detecting intrathoracic leakage after esophagectomy. Berkelmans GH; Kouwenhoven EA; Smeets BJ; Weijs TJ; Silva Corten LC; van Det MJ; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Luyer MD World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 21(30):9118-25. PubMed ID: 26290638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of a consensus-based algorithm for diagnosing anastomotic leak after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Lemmens J; Klarenbeek B; Verstegen M; van Workum F; Hannink G; Ubels S; Rosman C Dis Esophagus; 2023 Sep; 36(10):. PubMed ID: 36988007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT scan for early diagnosis of anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery: is rectal contrast useful? Moreno-Lopez N; Mvouama S; Bourredjem A; Fournel I; Perrin T; Flaris A; Rat P; Facy O Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Aug; 27(8):639-645. PubMed ID: 36264522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]