These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35359088)
41. Endoscopic mucosal ischemic index for predicting anastomotic complications after esophagectomy: a prospective cohort study. Kobayashi S; Kanetaka K; Yoneda A; Yamaguchi N; Kobayashi K; Nagata Y; Maruya Y; Yamaguchi S; Hidaka M; Eguchi S Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Jan; 408(1):37. PubMed ID: 36648542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Half of Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy Are Undetected on Initial Postoperative Esophagram. Elliott IA; Berry MF; Trope W; Lui NS; Guenthart BA; Liou DZ; Whyte RI; Backhus LM; Shrager JB Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 Mar; 115(3):719-724. PubMed ID: 35618049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Clinical Outcome of Middle Thoracic Esophageal Cancer with Intrathoracic or Cervical Anastomosis. Huang HT; Wang F; Shen L; Xia CQ; Lu CX; Zhong CJ Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jun; 63(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 24715527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; Tran TC; Hop WC; Wijnhoven BP; de Jonge J Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 21725230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Early postoperative endoscopy for targeted management of patients at risks of anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. Nishikawa K; Fujita T; Yuda M; Yamamoto S; Tanaka Y; Matsumoto A; Tanishima Y; Yano F; Mitsumori N; Yanaga K Surgery; 2016 Nov; 160(5):1294-1301. PubMed ID: 27521045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Pre-embedded cervical circular stapled anastomosis in esophagectomy. Li J; Wang B; Liang T; Guo NN; Zhao M Thorac Cancer; 2020 Mar; 11(3):723-727. PubMed ID: 32017456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A risk scoring system for early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after subtotal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Sugita S; Miyata K; Shimizu D; Ebata T; Yokoyama Y Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2023 Oct; 53(10):936-941. PubMed ID: 37370213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluation of Anastomotic Leak after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Typical Time Point of Occurrence, Mode of Diagnosis, Value of Routine Radiocontrast Agent Studies and Therapeutic Options. Struecker B; Andreou A; Chopra S; Heilmann AC; Spenke J; Denecke C; Sauer IM; Bahra M; Pratschke J; Biebl M Dig Surg; 2018; 35(5):419-426. PubMed ID: 29131024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Nomogram prediction model of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer surgery]. Ma SR; Feng H; Zhao GF; Bai HJ; Zhao L; Zhao ZR Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 Dec; 45(12):1065-1076. PubMed ID: 38110315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Omental reinforcement of the thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis: an analysis of leak and reintervention rates in patients undergoing planned and salvage esophagectomy. Sepesi B; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Correa A; Mehran RJ; Rice D; Roth J; Vaporciyan A; Hofstetter WL J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1146-50. PubMed ID: 22939861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Choice of therapeutic strategies in intrathoracic anastomotic leak following esophagectomy. Guo J; Chu X; Liu Y; Zhou N; Ma Y; Liang C World J Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec; 12():402. PubMed ID: 25547979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. C-reactive protein and drain amylase: their utility in ruling out anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Stuart SK; Kuypers TJL; Martijnse IS; Heisterkamp J; Matthijsen RA Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023 May; 58(5):448-452. PubMed ID: 36346047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Anastomotic Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Total Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Results From the EsoBenchmark Database. Schröder W; Raptis DA; Schmidt HM; Gisbertz SS; Moons J; Asti E; Luyer MDP; Hölscher AH; Schneider PM; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Nafteux P; Nilsson M; Räsanen J; Palazzo F; Mercer S; Bonavina L; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Wijjnhoven BPL; Pattyn P; Grimminger PP; Bruns CJ; Gutschow CA Ann Surg; 2019 Nov; 270(5):820-826. PubMed ID: 31634181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Quality of life in patients with esophageal carcinoma undergoing thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy and circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis via retrosternal route]. Wang YB; Cai RJ; Han YJ; Wang WJ; Yang XY; Liu SE Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 14(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 21713702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Totally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with single-utility incision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of mid-lower esophageal cancer. Guo W; Ma L; Zhang Y; Ma X; Yang S; Zhu X; Zhang J; Zhang Y; Xiang J; Li H Dis Esophagus; 2016; 29(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 25515694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Do alterations in plasma albumin and prealbumin after minimally invasive esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma influence the incidence of cervical anastomotic leak? Wang YJ; Liu XH; Mei LY; Li KK; Jiang YG; Guo W Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3943-9. PubMed ID: 26694179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer. Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]