These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35359186)

  • 1. Maxillary sinus dimensions in skeletal class II population with different vertical skeletal patterns.
    Syverson A; Li C; Zheng Z; Proskurnin E; Chung CH; Zou M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jul; 26(7):5045-5060. PubMed ID: 35359186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maxillary Sinus Dimensions in Skeletal Class I Chinese Population with Different Vertical Skeletal Patterns: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Wang J; Zou M; Syverson A; Zheng Z; Li C
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36553151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cone Beam CT Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus Floor and Alveolar Crest Anatomy for the Safe Placement of Implants.
    Şeker BK; Orhan K; Şeker E; Ustaoğlu G; Ozan O; Bağiş N
    Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(7):913-920. PubMed ID: 33059561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional assessment of the favorability of maxillary posterior teeth intrusion in different skeletal classes limited by the vertical relationship with the maxillary sinus floor.
    Abdulghani EA; Al-Sosowa AA; Alhammadi MS; Al-Fakeh H; Al-Gumaei WS; Almashraqi AA; Sharhan HM; Cao B
    Head Face Med; 2022 Apr; 18(1):13. PubMed ID: 35413855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variations in the alveolar bone morphology in maxillary molar area: a retrospective CBCT study.
    Tang Y; Lu W; Zhang Y; Wu W; Sun Q; Zhang Y; Liu X; Liang W; Chen S; Han B
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):872. PubMed ID: 39090625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional assessment of the favorability of maxillary posterior teeth intrusion in different facial patterns limited by the vertical relationship with the maxillary sinus floor.
    Abdulghani EA; Alhammadi MS; Al-Sosowa AA; Almashraqi AA; Sharhan HM; Al-Fakeh H; Cao B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jul; 26(7):4905-4915. PubMed ID: 35306610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anatomical analyses for maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a lateral approach: A cone beam computed tomography study.
    Kawakami S; Botticelli D; Nakajima Y; Sakuma S; Baba S
    Ann Anat; 2019 Nov; 226():29-34. PubMed ID: 31330302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Single Tooth Loss to Maxillary Sinus and Surrounding Bone Anatomy With Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Multicenter Study.
    Keceli HG; Dursun E; Dolgun A; Velasco-Torres M; Karaoglulari S; Ghoreishi R; Sinjab K; Sheridan RA; Kubilius M; Tözüm MD; Galindo-Moreno P; Yilmaz HG; Wang HL; Juodzbalys G; Tözüm TF
    Implant Dent; 2017 Oct; 26(5):690-699. PubMed ID: 28885316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of maxillary sinus volume and dimensions in different vertical face growth patterns: a study of cone-beam computed tomography.
    Okşayan R; Sökücü O; Yeşildal S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2017 Jul; 75(5):345-349. PubMed ID: 28376676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluating the bony canal structure of the posterior superior alveolar artery using cone-beam computed tomography].
    Zhitian D; Ping Y; Runfa W; Peng B; Rui R; Min H; Chen X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 32(6):581-3. PubMed ID: 25665425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Different Preosteotomy Determinants as Affecting the Success of Implant Therapy: A "CBCT"-based Clinical Study.
    Jain S; Kapoor K; Sethi K; Dahiya DR; Singh B; Sangwan R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Oct; 20(10):1212-1216. PubMed ID: 31883259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive value of ridge dimensions on autologous bone graft resorption in staged maxillary sinus augmentation surgery using Cone-Beam CT.
    Klijn RJ; van den Beucken JJ; Bronkhorst EM; Berge SJ; Meijer GJ; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):409-15. PubMed ID: 22092724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cone Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Alone or in Combination with Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Kiliç SC; Güngörmüş M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):1367-1375. PubMed ID: 27861663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Morphological analysis of the alveolar bone of the anterior teeth in severe high-angle skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Ma J; Huang J; Jiang JH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0210461. PubMed ID: 30908485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Morphology and Residual Bone for Implant Placement by Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
    Valizadeh S; Baharestani M; Amid R; Ahsaie MG
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2022; 32(2):61-71. PubMed ID: 35695628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anatomical consideration for optimal position of orthodontic miniscrews in the maxilla: a CBCT appraisal.
    Al Amri MS; Sabban HM; Alsaggaf DH; Alsulaimani FF; Al-Turki GA; Al-Zahrani MS; Zawawi KH
    Ann Saudi Med; 2020; 40(4):330-337. PubMed ID: 32757983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safe zones for miniscrews in maxillary dentition distalization assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Liu H; Wu X; Yang L; Ding Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):500-506. PubMed ID: 28257734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anatomical characteristics and dimensions of edentulous sites in the posterior maxillae of patients referred for implant therapy.
    Nunes LS; Bornstein MM; Sendi P; Buser D
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 23593627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A 3D comparison of dimension of infrazygomatic crest region in different vertical skeletal patterns: A retrospective study.
    Murugesan A; Jain RK
    Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):770-775. PubMed ID: 32978079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal sites for orthodontic anchor screw placement using panoramic images: risk of maxillary sinus perforation and contact with adjacent tooth roots during screw placement.
    Miyazawa K; Shibata M; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shimura N; Goto S
    Prog Orthod; 2021 Dec; 22(1):46. PubMed ID: 34878627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.