These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35359188)

  • 1. Bacteria in the cavity-restoration interface after varying periods of clinical service - SEM description of distribution and 16S rRNA gene sequence identification of isolates.
    Arora RK; Mordan NJ; Spratt DA; Ng YL; Gulabivala K
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jul; 26(7):5029-5044. PubMed ID: 35359188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
    Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations.
    Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new in vitro model for the study of microbial microleakage around dental restorations: a preliminary qualitative evaluation.
    Matharu S; Spratt DA; Pratten J; Ng YL; Mordan N; Wilson M; Gulabivala K
    Int Endod J; 2001 Oct; 34(7):547-53. PubMed ID: 11601773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cyclic mechanical loading promotes bacterial penetration along composite restoration marginal gaps.
    Khvostenko D; Salehi S; Naleway SE; Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL; Mitchell JC; Kruzic JJ
    Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25900624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The microfloral analysis of secondary caries biofilm around Class I and Class II composite and amalgam fillings.
    Mo SS; Bao W; Lai GY; Wang J; Li MY
    BMC Infect Dis; 2010 Aug; 10():241. PubMed ID: 20712908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
    Schwendicke F; Kern M; Blunck U; Dörfer C; Drenck J; Paris S
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 25132367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coronal microleakage of temporary restorations in previously restored teeth with amalgam and composite.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtasli MB; Ozdemir S
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 15986953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: a microleakage study.
    Popoff DA; Gonçalves FS; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Ferreira RC; Mjör IA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):799-803. PubMed ID: 22484874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of pre- and postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of amalgam and composite restorations.
    Ulukapi H; Benderli Y; Ulukapi I
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 12946068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of a fiber-reinforcing technique for direct composite restorations of structurally compromised teeth on marginal microleakage.
    Sfeikos T; Dionysopoulos D; Kouros P; Naka O; Tolidis K
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):650-660. PubMed ID: 35233926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro study into the effect of a bacterial artificial caries system on the enamel adjacent to composite and amalgam restorations.
    Gilmour AS; Edmunds DH; Newcombe RG; Clark MF
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 8519054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
    Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations.
    Khvostenko D; Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL; Mitchell JC; Kruzic JJ
    Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 26621028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.