These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35359239)

  • 21. The cumulative effects assessment of a coastal ecological restoration project in China: An integrated perspective.
    Ma D; Zhang L; Fang Q; Jiang Y; Elliott M
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2017 May; 118(1-2):254-260. PubMed ID: 28274474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Integrated risk and recovery monitoring of ecosystem restorations on contaminated sites.
    Hooper MJ; Glomb SJ; Harper DD; Hoelzle TB; McIntosh LM; Mulligan DR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Apr; 12(2):284-95. PubMed ID: 26465231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Long-term assessment of ecosystem services at ecological restoration sites using Landsat time series.
    Del Río-Mena T; Willemen L; Vrieling A; Snoeys A; Nelson A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0243020. PubMed ID: 34161335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Applications of habitat equivalency analysis in ecological damage assessment of oil spill incident].
    Yang Y; Han DX; Wang HY
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2011 Aug; 22(8):2113-8. PubMed ID: 22097375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A framework for net environmental benefit analysis for remediation or restoration of contaminated sites.
    Efroymson RA; Nicolette JP; Suter GW
    Environ Manage; 2004 Sep; 34(3):315-31. PubMed ID: 15520889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Realizing the potential of ecosystem services: a framework for relating ecological changes to economic benefits.
    Wainger L; Mazzotta M
    Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 48(4):710-33. PubMed ID: 21786182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An evaluative tool for rapid assessment of derelict vessel effects on coastal resources.
    Wessel CC; McDonald A; Cebrian J
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Feb; 207():262-268. PubMed ID: 29179115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Public perception of coastal habitat loss and habitat creation using artificial floating islands in the UK.
    Ware J; Callaway R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0224424. PubMed ID: 31671127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Methodology to Evaluate Ecological Resources and Risk Using Two Case Studies at the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Bunn A; Downs J; Jeitner C; Pittfield T; Salisbury J; Kosson D
    Environ Manage; 2017 Mar; 59(3):357-372. PubMed ID: 27904947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fine-Scale Cartography of Human Impacts along French Mediterranean Coasts: A Relevant Map for the Management of Marine Ecosystems.
    Holon F; Mouquet N; Boissery P; Bouchoucha M; Delaruelle G; Tribot AS; Deter J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135473. PubMed ID: 26266542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Integrating long-term stewardship goals into the remediation process: natural resource damages and the Department of Energy.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 16554118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ecosystem restoration programs challenges under climate and land use change.
    Yang Q; Liu G; Casazza M; Dumontet S; Yang Z
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 807(Pt 2):150527. PubMed ID: 34599963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Joint analysis of stressors and ecosystem services to enhance restoration effectiveness.
    Allan JD; McIntyre PB; Smith SD; Halpern BS; Boyer GL; Buchsbaum A; Burton GA; Campbell LM; Chadderton WL; Ciborowski JJ; Doran PJ; Eder T; Infante DM; Johnson LB; Joseph CA; Marino AL; Prusevich A; Read JG; Rose JB; Rutherford ES; Sowa SP; Steinman AD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Jan; 110(1):372-7. PubMed ID: 23248308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Difference in the net value of ecological services between natural and artificial forests in China.
    Cao S; Zhang J; Su W
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Oct; 33(5):1076-1083. PubMed ID: 30693984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Translating ecological risk to ecosystem service loss.
    Munns WR; Helm RC; Adams WJ; Clements WH; Cramer MA; Curry M; DiPinto LM; Johns DM; Seiler R; Williams LL; Young D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):500-14. PubMed ID: 19545189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improving marine biodiversity offsetting: A proposed methodology for better assessing losses and gains.
    Bas A; Jacob C; Hay J; Pioch S; Thorin S
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 175():46-59. PubMed ID: 27019359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Application of natural resource valuation concepts for development of sustainable remediation plans for groundwater.
    Connor JA; Paquette S; McHugh T; Gie E; Hemingway M; Bianchi G
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 204(Pt 2):721-729. PubMed ID: 28395860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of perceived importance of ecosystem services and stated financial constraints on willingness to pay for riparian meadow restoration in Flanders (Belgium).
    Chen WY; Aertsens J; Liekens I; Broekx S; De Nocker L
    Environ Manage; 2014 Aug; 54(2):346-59. PubMed ID: 24841691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ecosystem service trends in basin-scale restoration initiatives: a review.
    Trabucchi M; Ntshotsho P; O'Farrell P; Comín FA
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Nov; 111():18-23. PubMed ID: 22813855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application of management tools to integrate ecological principles with the design of marine infrastructure.
    Dafforn KA; Mayer-Pinto M; Morris RL; Waltham NJ
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Aug; 158():61-73. PubMed ID: 25965051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.