228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35360005)
1. Predicting Nanoparticle Delivery to Tumors Using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Approaches.
Lin Z; Chou WC; Cheng YH; He C; Monteiro-Riviere NA; Riviere JE
Int J Nanomedicine; 2022; 17():1365-1379. PubMed ID: 35360005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An artificial intelligence-assisted physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model to predict nanoparticle delivery to tumors in mice.
Chou WC; Chen Q; Yuan L; Cheng YH; He C; Monteiro-Riviere NA; Riviere JE; Lin Z
J Control Release; 2023 Sep; 361():53-63. PubMed ID: 37499908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interpretable XGBoost-SHAP Model Predicts Nanoparticles Delivery Efficiency Based on Tumor Genomic Mutations and Nanoparticle Properties.
Ma X; Tang Y; Wang C; Li Y; Zhang J; Luo Y; Xu Z; Wu F; Wang S
ACS Appl Bio Mater; 2023 Oct; 6(10):4326-4335. PubMed ID: 37683105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Machine learning and artificial intelligence in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.
Chou WC; Lin Z
Toxicol Sci; 2023 Jan; 191(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 36156156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial intelligence to deep learning: machine intelligence approach for drug discovery.
Gupta R; Srivastava D; Sahu M; Tiwari S; Ambasta RK; Kumar P
Mol Divers; 2021 Aug; 25(3):1315-1360. PubMed ID: 33844136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Knowledge Gaps in Generating Cell-Based Drug Delivery Systems and a Possible Meeting with Artificial Intelligence.
Mozafari N; Mozafari N; Dehshahri A; Azadi A
Mol Pharm; 2023 Aug; 20(8):3757-3778. PubMed ID: 37428824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial intelligence and machine learning disciplines with the potential to improve the nanotoxicology and nanomedicine fields: a comprehensive review.
Singh AV; Varma M; Laux P; Choudhary S; Datusalia AK; Gupta N; Luch A; Gandhi A; Kulkarni P; Nath B
Arch Toxicol; 2023 Apr; 97(4):963-979. PubMed ID: 36878992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Computational Nanotoxicology: Unlocking and Empowering Nanomedicine.
Singh AV; Ansari MHD; Rosenkranz D; Maharjan RS; Kriegel FL; Gandhi K; Kanase A; Singh R; Laux P; Luch A
Adv Healthc Mater; 2020 Sep; 9(17):e1901862. PubMed ID: 32627972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Machine learning random forest for predicting oncosomatic variant NGS analysis.
Pellegrino E; Jacques C; Beaufils N; Nanni I; Carlioz A; Metellus P; Ouafik L
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21820. PubMed ID: 34750410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Toxicological Sciences.
Lin Z; Chou WC
Toxicol Sci; 2022 Aug; 189(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 35861448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meta-Analysis of Nanoparticle Delivery to Tumors Using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation Approach.
Cheng YH; He C; Riviere JE; Monteiro-Riviere NA; Lin Z
ACS Nano; 2020 Mar; 14(3):3075-3095. PubMed ID: 32078303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PTML Model for Selection of Nanoparticles, Anticancer Drugs, and Vitamins in the Design of Drug-Vitamin Nanoparticle Release Systems for Cancer Cotherapy.
Santana R; Zuluaga R; Gañán P; Arrasate S; Onieva E; Montemore MM; González-Díaz H
Mol Pharm; 2020 Jul; 17(7):2612-2627. PubMed ID: 32459098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-Analysis of Nanoparticle Distribution in Tumors and Major Organs in Tumor-Bearing Mice.
Chen Q; Yuan L; Chou WC; Cheng YH; He C; Monteiro-Riviere NA; Riviere JE; Lin Z
ACS Nano; 2023 Oct; 17(20):19810-19831. PubMed ID: 37812732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Role of
Jayasinghe MK; Lee CY; Tran TTT; Tan R; Chew SM; Yeo BZJ; Loh WX; Pirisinu M; Le MTN
Front Digit Health; 2022; 4():838590. PubMed ID: 35373184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a multi-route physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for nanomaterials: a comparison between a traditional versus a new route-specific approach using gold nanoparticles in rats.
Chou WC; Cheng YH; Riviere JE; Monteiro-Riviere NA; Kreyling WG; Lin Z
Part Fibre Toxicol; 2022 Jul; 19(1):47. PubMed ID: 35804418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Understanding deep learning - challenges and prospects.
Adnan N; Umer F
J Pak Med Assoc; 2022 Feb; 72(Suppl 1)(2):S59-S63. PubMed ID: 35202373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A large-scale machine learning analysis of inorganic nanoparticles in preclinical cancer research.
Mendes BB; Zhang Z; Conniot J; Sousa DP; Ravasco JMJM; Onweller LA; Lorenc A; Rodrigues T; Reker D; Conde J
Nat Nanotechnol; 2024 Jun; 19(6):867-878. PubMed ID: 38750164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting the sorption efficiency of heavy metal based on the biochar characteristics, metal sources, and environmental conditions using various novel hybrid machine learning models.
Ke B; Nguyen H; Bui XN; Bui HB; Choi Y; Zhou J; Moayedi H; Costache R; Nguyen-Trang T
Chemosphere; 2021 Aug; 276():130204. PubMed ID: 34088091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of Artificial Intelligence for Preoperative Diagnostic and Prognostic Prediction in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Based on Blood Biomarkers.
Kawakami E; Tabata J; Yanaihara N; Ishikawa T; Koseki K; Iida Y; Saito M; Komazaki H; Shapiro JS; Goto C; Akiyama Y; Saito R; Saito M; Takano H; Yamada K; Okamoto A
Clin Cancer Res; 2019 May; 25(10):3006-3015. PubMed ID: 30979733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using machine learning models to predict the effects of seasonal fluxes on Plesiomonas shigelloides population density.
Ekundayo TC; Ijabadeniyi OA; Igbinosa EO; Okoh AI
Environ Pollut; 2023 Jan; 317():120734. PubMed ID: 36455774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
