57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35360749)
1. The Impact of Total Variation Regularized Expectation Maximization Reconstruction on
Liu L; Liu H; Xu S; Zhang S; Tao Y; Mok GSP; Chen Y
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():845806. PubMed ID: 35360749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of total variation regularized expectation maximization reconstruction on the image quality of
Yang FJ; Ai SY; Wu R; Lv Y; Xie HF; Dong Y; Meng QL; Wang F
Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20201356. PubMed ID: 33571001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total variation regularized expectation maximization reconstruction improves 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT image quality as compared to ordered subset expectation maximization reconstruction.
Liu H; Liu L; Xu S; Lu Z; Mok GS; Wang Y; Tao Y; Chen Y
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Dec; 67(4):280-286. PubMed ID: 36120734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A proper protocol for routine
Hu H; Huang Y; Sun H; Zhou K; Jiang L; Zhong J; Chen L; Wang L; Han Y; Wu H
EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Sep; 10(1):51. PubMed ID: 37695324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative performance and optimal regularization parameter in block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstructions in clinical
Ter Voert EEGW; Muehlematter UJ; Delso G; Pizzuto DA; Müller J; Nagel HW; Burger IA
EJNMMI Res; 2018 Jul; 8(1):70. PubMed ID: 30054750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation of PET image quality with acquisition time/bed and enhancement of lesion quantification accuracy through deep progressive learning.
Yang H; Chen S; Qi M; Chen W; Kong Q; Zhang J; Song S
EJNMMI Phys; 2024 Jan; 11(1):7. PubMed ID: 38195785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of the Iterative OSEM and HYPER Algorithm for Total-body PET at SUVmax with a Low 18F-FDG Activity, a Short Acquisition Time and Small Lesions.
Zan K; Duan Y; Zhao M; Li H; Cui X; Chai L; Cheng Z
Curr Med Imaging; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38532604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of a deep learning enhancement method applied to PET images acquired with a reduced acquisition time.
Ciborowski K; Gramek-Jedwabna A; Gołąb M; Miechowicz I; Szczurek J; Ruchała M; Czepczyński R
Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2023; 26(0):116-122. PubMed ID: 37786943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noise reduction using a Bayesian penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm on a time-of-flight PET-CT scanner.
Caribé PRRV; Koole M; D'Asseler Y; Van Den Broeck B; Vandenberghe S
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):22. PubMed ID: 31823084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reduction of [
Cox CPW; Brabander T; Vegt E; de Lussanet de la Sablonière QG; Graven LH; Verburg FA; Segbers M
EJNMMI Phys; 2024 Mar; 11(1):27. PubMed ID: 38488989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of various penalty parameter values in Q.Clear algorithm for rectal cancer detection on
Sadeghi F; Sheikhzadeh P; Farzanehfar S; Ghafarian P; Moafpurian Y; Ay M
EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Oct; 10(1):63. PubMed ID: 37843705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standard OSEM vs. regularized PET image reconstruction: qualitative and quantitative comparison using phantom data and various clinical radiopharmaceuticals.
Lantos J; Mittra ES; Levin CS; Iagaru A
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018; 8(2):110-118. PubMed ID: 29755844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phantom and clinical evaluation of Block Sequential Regularized Expectation Maximization (BSREM) reconstruction algorithm in 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT studies.
Sadeghi F; Sheikhzadeh P; Kasraie N; Farzanehfar S; Abbasi M; Salehi Y; Ay M
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2023 Sep; 46(3):1297-1308. PubMed ID: 37439965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of post reconstruction- and reconstruction-based deep learning denoising methods in cardiac SPECT.
Sohlberg A; Kangasmaa T; Tikkakoski A
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Sep; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 37666231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact on Image Noise of Incorporating Detector Blurring into Image Reconstruction for a Small Animal PET Scanner.
Lee K; Miyaoka RS; Lewellen TK; Alessio AM; Kinahan PE
IEEE Trans Nucl Sci; 2009 Oct; 56(5):2769-2776. PubMed ID: 20161545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acquisition Duration Optimization Using Visual Grading Regression in [
Nilsson T; Rasinski P; Smedby Ö; Af Burén S; Sparrelid E; Löhr JM; Tran TA; Blomgren A; Tzortzakakis A; Axelsson R; Holstensson M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38627014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Somatostatin Receptor Imaging in Mice with Difference Positive Rate of SSTR2.
Xie Q; Zhou W; Meng X; Ding J; Li D; Lu M; Yang Z; Yu J
Neuroendocrinology; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37926096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Post-reconstruction enhancement of [
Ly J; Minarik D; Jögi J; Wollmer P; Trägårdh E
EJNMMI Res; 2021 May; 11(1):48. PubMed ID: 33974171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CYP3A4 inhibitors do not influence [
Chahid Y; Chahid F; van de Garde E; Booij J; Verberne HJ; Hendrikse NH
EJNMMI Res; 2023 Sep; 13(1):84. PubMed ID: 37736819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved [
Li L; Chen R; Wen J; Yang X; Hu D; Sun H; Ge Q; Ng YL; Zhou Y; Wan L; Chen Y; Wei W; Liu J
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Aug; 13(8):5230-5241. PubMed ID: 37581091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
