282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35361577)
41. Randomized Clinical Trials of Machine Learning Interventions in Health Care: A Systematic Review.
Plana D; Shung DL; Grimshaw AA; Saraf A; Sung JJY; Kann BH
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Sep; 5(9):e2233946. PubMed ID: 36173632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review.
Andaur Navarro CL; Damen JAA; Takada T; Nijman SWJ; Dhiman P; Ma J; Collins GS; Bajpai R; Riley RD; Moons KGM; Hooft L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 35026997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Machine learning-based multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging radiomics model for distinguishing central neurocytoma from glioma of lateral ventricle.
Mo H; Liang W; Huang Z; Li X; Xiao X; Liu H; He J; Xu Y; Wu Y
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jun; 33(6):4259-4269. PubMed ID: 36547672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Quality of radiomics for predicting microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review.
Yuan E; Chen Y; Song B
Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3467-3477. PubMed ID: 36749371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review.
Dhiman P; Ma J; Andaur Navarro CL; Speich B; Bullock G; Damen JAA; Hooft L; Kirtley S; Riley RD; Van Calster B; Moons KGM; Collins GS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):101. PubMed ID: 35395724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence.
Collins GS; Dhiman P; Andaur Navarro CL; Ma J; Hooft L; Reitsma JB; Logullo P; Beam AL; Peng L; Van Calster B; van Smeden M; Riley RD; Moons KG
BMJ Open; 2021 Jul; 11(7):e048008. PubMed ID: 34244270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma: differentiation using MRI derived first-order texture analysis - a machine learning study.
Priya S; Ward C; Locke T; Soni N; Maheshwarappa RP; Monga V; Agarwal A; Bathla G
Neuroradiol J; 2021 Aug; 34(4):320-328. PubMed ID: 33657924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Machine Learning-based Texture Analysis of Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging to Differentiate between Glioblastoma and Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.
Kunimatsu A; Kunimatsu N; Yasaka K; Akai H; Kamiya K; Watadani T; Mori H; Abe O
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2019 Jan; 18(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 29769456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Machine learning vs. conventional statistical models for predicting heart failure readmission and mortality.
Shin S; Austin PC; Ross HJ; Abdel-Qadir H; Freitas C; Tomlinson G; Chicco D; Mahendiran M; Lawler PR; Billia F; Gramolini A; Epelman S; Wang B; Lee DS
ESC Heart Fail; 2021 Feb; 8(1):106-115. PubMed ID: 33205591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. MRI Radiomic Features to Predict IDH1 Mutation Status in Gliomas: A Machine Learning Approach using Gradient Tree Boosting.
Sakai Y; Yang C; Kihira S; Tsankova N; Khan F; Hormigo A; Lai A; Cloughesy T; Nael K
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 33121211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Machine learning prediction models in orthopedic surgery: A systematic review in transparent reporting.
Groot OQ; Ogink PT; Lans A; Twining PK; Kapoor ND; DiGiovanni W; Bindels BJJ; Bongers MER; Oosterhoff JHF; Karhade AV; Oner FC; Verlaan JJ; Schwab JH
J Orthop Res; 2022 Feb; 40(2):475-483. PubMed ID: 33734466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. MRI as a diagnostic biomarker for differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Suh CH; Kim HS; Jung SC; Park JE; Choi CG; Kim SJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):560-572. PubMed ID: 30637843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning-Based Radiomics in Grading Gliomas: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Sohn CK; Bisdas S
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2020; 2020():2127062. PubMed ID: 33746649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Optimizing a machine learning based glioma grading system using multi-parametric MRI histogram and texture features.
Zhang X; Yan LF; Hu YC; Li G; Yang Y; Han Y; Sun YZ; Liu ZC; Tian Q; Han ZY; Liu LD; Hu BQ; Qiu ZY; Wang W; Cui GB
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(29):47816-47830. PubMed ID: 28599282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Machine and Deep Learning for Tuberculosis Detection on Chest X-Rays: Systematic Literature Review.
Hansun S; Argha A; Liaw ST; Celler BG; Marks GB
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Jul; 25():e43154. PubMed ID: 37399055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Diagnostic accuracy of machine-learning-assisted detection for anterior cruciate ligament injury based on magnetic resonance imaging: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lao Y; Jia B; Yan P; Pan M; Hui X; Li J; Luo W; Li X; Han J; Yan P; Yao L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Dec; 98(50):e18324. PubMed ID: 31852123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Machine learning in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Current status, clinical concerns and prospects for future-A systematic review.
Alabi RO; Youssef O; Pirinen M; Elmusrati M; Mäkitie AA; Leivo I; Almangush A
Artif Intell Med; 2021 May; 115():102060. PubMed ID: 34001326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Machine-learning in grading of gliomas based on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.
Citak-Er F; Firat Z; Kovanlikaya I; Ture U; Ozturk-Isik E
Comput Biol Med; 2018 Aug; 99():154-160. PubMed ID: 29933126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging-based machine learning in Alzheimer's disease detection: a meta-analysis.
Hu J; Wang Y; Guo D; Qu Z; Sui C; He G; Wang S; Chen X; Wang C; Liu X
Neuroradiology; 2023 Mar; 65(3):513-527. PubMed ID: 36477499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis analysis to evaluate the quality of reporting of postoperative pancreatic fistula prediction models after pancreatoduodenectomy: A systematic review.
Alhulaili ZM; Linnemann RJ; Dascau L; Pleijhuis RG; Klaase JM
Surgery; 2023 Sep; 174(3):684-691. PubMed ID: 37296054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
