These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35363036)

  • 21. Security of six-state quantum key distribution protocol with threshold detectors.
    Kato G; Tamaki K
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jul; 6():30044. PubMed ID: 27443610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reference-frame-independent quantum key distribution with advantage distillation.
    Zhu JR; Zhang CM; Wang R; Li HW
    Opt Lett; 2023 Feb; 48(3):542-545. PubMed ID: 36723526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hong-Ou-Mandel interference between independent III-V on silicon waveguide integrated lasers.
    Agnesi C; Da Lio B; Cozzolino D; Cardi L; Ben Bakir B; Hassan K; Della Frera A; Ruggeri A; Giudice A; Vallone G; Villoresi P; Tosi A; Rottwitt K; Ding Y; Bacco D
    Opt Lett; 2019 Jan; 44(2):271-274. PubMed ID: 30644878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantum key distribution with correlated sources.
    Pereira M; Kato G; Mizutani A; Curty M; Tamaki K
    Sci Adv; 2020 Sep; 6(37):. PubMed ID: 32917693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Continuous variable measurement device independent quantum conferencing with postselection.
    Fletcher AI; Pirandola S
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17329. PubMed ID: 36243765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Upper Bounds on Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution.
    Christandl M; Ferrara R; Horodecki K
    Phys Rev Lett; 2021 Apr; 126(16):160501. PubMed ID: 33961475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Weak randomness impacts the security of reference-frame-independent quantum key distribution.
    Zhang CM; Wang WB; Li HW; Wang Q
    Opt Lett; 2019 Mar; 44(5):1226-1229. PubMed ID: 30821754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improving the performance of reference-frame-independent quantum key distribution with advantage distillation technology.
    Jiang XL; Wang Y; Li JJ; Lu YF; Hao CP; Zhou C; Bao WS
    Opt Express; 2023 Mar; 31(6):9196-9210. PubMed ID: 37157494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simple security proof of coherent-one-way quantum key distribution.
    Gao RQ; Xie YM; Gu J; Liu WB; Weng CX; Li BH; Yin HL; Chen ZB
    Opt Express; 2022 Jun; 30(13):23783-23795. PubMed ID: 36225053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Device-independent quantum key distribution with random key basis.
    Schwonnek R; Goh KT; Primaatmaja IW; Tan EY; Wolf R; Scarani V; Lim CC
    Nat Commun; 2021 May; 12(1):2880. PubMed ID: 34001885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Finite-key analysis for twin-field quantum key distribution with composable security.
    Yin HL; Chen ZB
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):17113. PubMed ID: 31745131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Finite-key bound for semi-device-independent quantum key distribution.
    Zhou C; Xu P; Bao WS; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang MS; Li HW
    Opt Express; 2017 Jul; 25(15):16971-16980. PubMed ID: 28789196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Device calibration impacts security of quantum key distribution.
    Jain N; Wittmann C; Lydersen L; Wiechers C; Elser D; Marquardt C; Makarov V; Leuchs G
    Phys Rev Lett; 2011 Sep; 107(11):110501. PubMed ID: 22026652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Efficient High-Dimensional Quantum Key Distribution with Hybrid Encoding.
    Jo Y; Park HS; Lee SW; Son W
    Entropy (Basel); 2019 Jan; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 33266796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution Over a 404 km Optical Fiber.
    Yin HL; Chen TY; Yu ZW; Liu H; You LX; Zhou YH; Chen SJ; Mao Y; Huang MQ; Zhang WJ; Chen H; Li MJ; Nolan D; Zhou F; Jiang X; Wang Z; Zhang Q; Wang XB; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2016 Nov; 117(19):190501. PubMed ID: 27858431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Blind information reconciliation with variable step sizes for quantum key distribution.
    Liu Z; Wu Z; Huang A
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):171. PubMed ID: 31932615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sending-or-Not-Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with a Passive Decoy-State Method.
    Xue K; Shen Z; Zhao S; Mao Q
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 May; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 35626547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantum key distribution with hacking countermeasures and long term field trial.
    Dixon AR; Dynes JF; Lucamarini M; Fröhlich B; Sharpe AW; Plews A; Tam W; Yuan ZL; Tanizawa Y; Sato H; Kawamura S; Fujiwara M; Sasaki M; Shields AJ
    Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):1978. PubMed ID: 28512308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fully Passive Quantum Key Distribution.
    Wang W; Wang R; Hu C; Zapatero V; Qian L; Qi B; Curty M; Lo HK
    Phys Rev Lett; 2023 Jun; 130(22):220801. PubMed ID: 37327415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Proof of principle implementation of phase-flip error rejection quantum key distribution.
    Wu J; An XB; Yin ZQ; Wang FX; Chen W; Wang S; Guo GC; Han ZF
    Opt Lett; 2018 Oct; 43(19):4707-4710. PubMed ID: 30272720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.