These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35364232)

  • 21. Current State of Reporting Pain Outcomes in Cochrane Reviews of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions and Considerations for an OMERACT Research Agenda.
    Maxwell LJ; Wells GA; Simon LS; Conaghan PG; Grosskleg S; Scrivens K; Beaton DE; Bingham CO; Busse JW; Christensen R; Goel N; Jüni P; Kaiser U; Lyddiatt A; Mease PJ; Ostelo RW; Phillips K; Sapunar D; Singh JA; Strand V; Taylor AM; Terwee CB; Tugwell P
    J Rheumatol; 2015 Oct; 42(10):1934-1942. PubMed ID: 26373562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cochrane summary of findings: horse chestnut seed extract for chronic venous insufficiency.
    Underland V; Sæterdal I; Nilsen ES
    Glob Adv Health Med; 2012 Mar; 1(1):122-3. PubMed ID: 24278808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health].
    Morche J; Conrad S; Passon A; Perleth M; Gartlehner G; Meerpohl JJ; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 May; 133():58-66. PubMed ID: 29673801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence.
    Brunetti M; Shemilt I; Pregno S; Vale L; Oxman AD; Lord J; Sisk J; Ruiz F; Hill S; Guyatt GH; Jaeschke R; Helfand M; Harbour R; Davoli M; Amato L; Liberati A; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Feb; 66(2):140-50. PubMed ID: 22863410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tool to assess recognition and understanding of elements in Summary of Findings Table for health evidence synthesis: a cross-sectional study.
    Matas J; Tokalić R; García-Costa D; López-Iñesta E; Álvarez-García E; Grimaldo F; Marušić A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18044. PubMed ID: 37872203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Formatting modifications in GRADE evidence profiles improved guideline panelists comprehension and accessibility to information. A randomized trial.
    Vandvik PO; Santesso N; Akl EA; You J; Mulla S; Spencer FA; Johnston BC; Brozek J; Kreis J; Brandt L; Zhou Q; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 65(7):748-55. PubMed ID: 22564503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence].
    Perleth M; Matthias K; Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(3):256-68. PubMed ID: 23790708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improving GRADE evidence tables part 3: detailed guidance for explanatory footnotes supports creating and understanding GRADE certainty in the evidence judgments.
    Santesso N; Carrasco-Labra A; Langendam M; Brignardello-Petersen R; Mustafa RA; Heus P; Lasserson T; Opiyo N; Kunnamo I; Sinclair D; Garner P; Treweek S; Tovey D; Akl EA; Tugwell P; Brozek JL; Guyatt G; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():28-39. PubMed ID: 26796947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews.
    Hartling L; Guise JM; Hempel S; Featherstone R; Mitchell MD; Motu'apuaka ML; Robinson KA; Schoelles K; Totten A; Whitlock E; Wilt TJ; Anderson J; Berliner E; Gozu A; Kato E; Paynter R; Umscheid CA
    Syst Rev; 2017 Feb; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 28212677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving GRADE evidence tables part 2: a systematic survey of explanatory notes shows more guidance is needed.
    Langendam M; Carrasco-Labra A; Santesso N; Mustafa RA; Brignardello-Petersen R; Ventresca M; Heus P; Lasserson T; Moustgaard R; Brozek J; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():19-27. PubMed ID: 26791431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evidence-based urology: understanding GRADE methodology.
    Gonzalez-Padilla DA; Dahm P
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1230-1233. PubMed ID: 34598913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.
    King M; Nazareth I; Lampe F; Bower P; Chandler M; Morou M; Sibbald B; Lai R
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Sep; 9(35):1-186, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16153352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. User testing of an adaptation of fishbone diagrams to depict results of systematic reviews.
    Gartlehner G; Schultes MT; Titscher V; Morgan LC; Bobashev GV; Williams P; West SL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):169. PubMed ID: 29233133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-Risk of bias and indirectness.
    Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt GH; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Akl EA; Hazlewood G; Pardo-Hernandez H; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Qaseem A; Williams JW; Tugwell P; Flottorp S; Chang Y; Zhang Y; Mustafa RA; Rojas MX; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():94-104. PubMed ID: 29452223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Systematic Review of Patients' Values, Preferences, and Expectations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.
    Malde S; Umbach R; Wheeler JR; Lytvyn L; Cornu JN; Gacci M; Gratzke C; Herrmann TRW; Mamoulakis C; Rieken M; Speakman MJ; Gravas S; Drake MJ; Guyatt GH; Tikkinen KAO
    Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):796-809. PubMed ID: 33461781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains.
    Zhang Y; Coello PA; Guyatt GH; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Akl EA; Hazlewood G; Pardo-Hernandez H; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Qaseem A; Williams JW; Tugwell P; Flottorp S; Chang Y; Zhang Y; Mustafa RA; Rojas MX; Xie F; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():83-93. PubMed ID: 29800687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes.
    Pantoja T; Grimshaw JM; Colomer N; Castañon C; Leniz Martelli J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Dec; 12(12):CD001174. PubMed ID: 31858588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Early palliative care for adults with advanced cancer.
    Haun MW; Estel S; Rücker G; Friederich HC; Villalobos M; Thomas M; Hartmann M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jun; 6(6):CD011129. PubMed ID: 28603881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Call for Evidence-based Decision Making When Selecting Outcome Measurement Instruments for Summary of Findings Tables in Systematic Reviews: Results from an OMERACT Working Group.
    Beaton DE; Terwee CB; Singh JA; Hawker GA; Patrick DL; Burke LB; Toupin-April K; Tugwell PS
    J Rheumatol; 2015 Oct; 42(10):1954-1961. PubMed ID: 26373567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.