These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35364932)

  • 1. A finite element model to predict the double hearing protector effect on an in-house acoustic test fixture.
    Luan Y; Sgard F; Nélisse H; Doutres O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Mar; 151(3):1860. PubMed ID: 35364932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A finite element model to predict the sound attenuation of earplugs in an acoustical test fixture.
    Viallet G; Sgard F; Laville F; Boutin J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1269. PubMed ID: 25190400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube.
    Murphy WJ; Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Shaw PB; Stergar M
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):364-73. PubMed ID: 26356380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Earmuff performance in the presence of high-level impulse from a recoilless weapon firing in a confined space.
    Li Z; Tao G; Wen P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Jul; 156(1):359-368. PubMed ID: 38994905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part I: Review of previous work and the design of an improved test fixture.
    Schroeter J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1065-81. PubMed ID: 3700862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.
    Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):274-279. PubMed ID: 27762257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part II: Modeling the external ear, simulating bone conduction, and comparing test fixture and real-ear data.
    Schroeter J; Poesselt C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):505-27. PubMed ID: 3745683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.
    Ravicz ME; Melcher JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):216-31. PubMed ID: 11206150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numerical investigation of the earplug contribution to the low-frequency objective occlusion effect induced by bone-conducted stimulation.
    Carillo K; Doutres O; Sgard F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Sep; 150(3):2006. PubMed ID: 34598618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of wearing an anti-flash hood on the noise attenuation of earmuffs.
    Paddan GS; Lower MC
    Ind Health; 2021 Sep; 59(4):204-219. PubMed ID: 33692247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An acoustic head simulator for hearing protector evaluation. II: Measurements in steady-state and impulse noise environments.
    Giguère C; Kunov H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1197-205. PubMed ID: 2708666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simulation of the objective occlusion effect induced by bone-conducted stimulation using a three-dimensional finite-element model of a human head.
    Xu H; Sgard F; Carillo K; Wagnac É; de Guise J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):4018. PubMed ID: 34852629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is real-ear attenuation at threshold a function of hearing level?
    Berger EH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Nov; 78(5):1588-95. PubMed ID: 4067074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic Performance of 3D Printed Nanocomposite Earmuff.
    Ahmadi S; Nassiri P; Ghasemi I; Monazzam Ep MR
    Glob J Health Sci; 2015 May; 8(1):180-8. PubMed ID: 26234977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic Evaluation of the Relationship between Physical and Psychoacoustical Measurements of Hearing Protectors' Attenuation.
    Nélisse H; Le Cocq C; Boutin J; Laville F; Voix J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(12):829-44. PubMed ID: 26023884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dependence of acoustic attenuation of hearing protectors on incident sound level.
    Martin AM
    Br J Ind Med; 1979 Feb; 36(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 444436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional finite element modeling of human ear for sound transmission.
    Gan RZ; Feng B; Sun Q
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2004 Jun; 32(6):847-59. PubMed ID: 15255215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Theoretical investigation of the low frequency fundamental mechanism of the objective occlusion effect induced by bone-conducted stimulation.
    Carillo K; Doutres O; Sgard F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3476. PubMed ID: 32486794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attenuation characteristics of an extended-wear hearing aid: Impulse and continuous noise.
    Brungart DS; Spencer NJ; Pryor N; Abouzahra N; McKenna EA; Iyer N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Sep; 148(3):1404. PubMed ID: 33003895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.