These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35364939)

  • 1. Psychoacoustic modelling of rotor noise.
    Torija AJ; Li Z; Chaitanya P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Mar; 151(3):1804. PubMed ID: 35364939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychoacoustic analysis of contra-rotating propeller noise for unmanned aerial vehicles.
    Torija AJ; Chaitanya P; Li Z
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):835. PubMed ID: 33639829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrated Evaluation of the Aeroacoustics and Psychoacoustics of a Single Propeller.
    Sun J; Yonezawa K; Shima E; Liu H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of the Psychoacoustic Effect of Noise from Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.
    Hui CTJ; Kingan MJ; Hioka Y; Schmid G; Dodd G; Dirks KN; Edlin S; Mascarenhas S; Shim YM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(17):. PubMed ID: 34501482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Annoyance from industrial noise: indicators for a wide variety of industrial sources.
    Alayrac M; Marquis-Favre C; Viollon S; Morel J; Le Nost G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1128-39. PubMed ID: 20815449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects.
    Skagerstrand Å; Köbler S; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):775-783. PubMed ID: 28485649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigation of Metrics for Assessing Human Response to Drone Noise.
    Torija AJ; Nicholls RK
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(6):. PubMed ID: 35328839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Psychoacoustic Approach to Building Knowledge about Human Response to Noise of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.
    Torija AJ; Clark C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 33466937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Optimization Study on Listening Experiments to Improve the Comparability of Annoyance Ratings of Noise Samples from Different Experimental Sample Sets.
    Di G; Lu K; Shi X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Mar; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 29518036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychoacoustic quantification of mechanical heart valve noise.
    Nielsen T; Nielsen TV; Johansen P; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15700442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating multidimensional characteristics of noise signals with tones from building mechanical systems and their effects on annoyance.
    Lee J; Wang LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jan; 147(1):108. PubMed ID: 32006968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aircraft noise-Auralization-based assessment of weather-dependent effects on loudness and sharpness.
    Dreier C; Vorländer M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 May; 149(5):3565. PubMed ID: 34241113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Growth rate of loudness, annoyance, and noisiness as a function of tone location within the noise spectrum.
    Hellman RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jan; 75(1):209-18. PubMed ID: 6699282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of train type on annoyance and acoustic features of the rolling noise.
    Kasess CH; Noll A; Majdak P; Waubke H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1071-81. PubMed ID: 23927107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Personal noise ranking of road traffic: subjective estimation versus physiological parameters under laboratory conditions.
    Raggam RB; Cik M; Höldrich RR; Fallast K; Gallasch E; Fend M; Lackner A; Marth E
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2007 Mar; 210(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 17084667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sound quality characteristics of refrigerator noise in real living environments with relation to psychoacoustical and autocorrelation function parameters.
    Sato S; You J; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):314-25. PubMed ID: 17614491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustical and perceptual assessment of water sounds and their use over road traffic noise.
    Galbrun L; Ali TT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 23297897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using A-weighting for psychoacoustic active noise control.
    Bao H; Panahi IM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():5701-4. PubMed ID: 19963645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The annoyance of snoring and psychoacoustic parameters: a step towards an objective measurement.
    Rohrmeier C; Herzog M; Haubner F; Kuehnel TS
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 269(5):1537-43. PubMed ID: 22167475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.