BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35365437)

  • 1. Local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) for full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) procedures in Morocco.
    Talbi M; Mansouri ME; Nhila O; Tahiri Z; Eddaoui K; Khalis M
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2022 Jun; 53(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 35365437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in a Tertiary Hospital in Malaysia.
    Mohd Norsuddin N; Segar S; Ravintaran R; Mohd Zain N; Abdul Karim MK
    Healthcare (Basel); 2022 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 36292364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of radiation doses between diagnostic full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a clinical study.
    Asbeutah AM; AlMajran AA; Brindhaban A; Asbeutah SA
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Sep; 67(3):185-192. PubMed ID: 32495513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
    James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammography Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) in Ghana.
    Dzidzornu E; Angmorterh SK; Ofori-Manteaw BB; Aboagye S; Dzefi-Tettey K; Ofori EK
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 May; 27(2):611-616. PubMed ID: 33342686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proposed DRLs for mammography in Switzerland.
    Dupont L; Aberle C; Botsikas D; Ith M; Lima TVM; Menz R; Monnin P; Poletti PA; Presilla S; Schegerer A; Stoica LC; Trueb P; Sans Merce M
    J Radiol Prot; 2024 May; 44(2):. PubMed ID: 38530290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. INSTITUTIONAL BREAST DOSES IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY.
    Lekatou A; Metaxas V; Messaris G; Antzele P; Tzavellas G; Panayiotakis G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(2):239-251. PubMed ID: 30753684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of average glandular dose (AGD) in screening and diagnostic digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) towards establishing a reference dose range band (DRB): a developing country experience.
    Jeyasugiththan J; Maheshika Bandara BGU; Wickramarathna SHD; Thenuwara H; Satharasinghe D; Pallewatte AS; Hettiarachchi P
    J Radiol Prot; 2023 Jul; 43(3):. PubMed ID: 37463573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22711250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation exposure of digital breast tomosynthesis using an antiscatter grid compared with full-field digital mammography.
    Paulis LE; Lobbes MB; Lalji UC; Gelissen N; Bouwman RW; Wildberger JE; Jeukens CR
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Oct; 50(10):679-85. PubMed ID: 26011823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of average glandular dose and investigation of the relationship with compressed breast thickness in dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Fusco R; Raiano N; Raiano C; Maio F; Vallone P; Mattace Raso M; Setola SV; Granata V; Rubulotta MR; Barretta ML; Petrosino T; Petrillo A
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108912. PubMed ID: 32151787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation dose with digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography: per-view analysis.
    Gennaro G; Bernardi D; Houssami N
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):573-581. PubMed ID: 28819862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast Radiation Exposure of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared to Full-Field Digital Mammography in a Clinical Follow-Up Setting.
    Opitz M; Zensen S; Breuckmann K; Bos D; Forsting M; Hoffmann O; Stuschke M; Wetter A; Guberina N
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35204547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative analysis of radiation dosage and image quality between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional synthetic mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Choi Y; Woo OH; Shin HS; Cho KR; Seo BK; Choi GY
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():12-17. PubMed ID: 30703693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of patient dose during a digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Shakya S; Sulwathura U; Wickramanayake M; Dulshara T; Herath LHMIM; Wickramasinghe WMIS; Senanayake G
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 May; 29(3):573-576. PubMed ID: 36996507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Local diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography: Two hospitals study in northwest, Nigeria.
    Garba I; Bashir HS; Bello F; Nuhu KS; Mohammed S; Mansur Y; Lawal Y
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 52(3):435-442. PubMed ID: 33896746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of average glandular dose and breast cancer detection between single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view digital mammography (DM) and two-view DM: correlation with breast thickness and density.
    Shin SU; Chang JM; Bae MS; Lee SH; Cho N; Seo M; Kim WH; Moon WK
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Jan; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25182628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of different exposure parameters on radiation dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: A phantom study.
    Asbeutah AM; Brindhaban A; AlMajran AA; Asbeutah SA
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Aug; 26(3):e129-e133. PubMed ID: 32052759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with new reconstruction and new processing for dose reduction.
    Endo T; Morita T; Oiwa M; Suda N; Sato Y; Ichihara S; Shiraiwa M; Yoshikawa K; Horiba T; Ogawa H; Hayashi Y; Sendai T; Arai T
    Breast Cancer; 2018 Mar; 25(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 28956298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Threshold in breast compression reduction for full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Afandy AN; Tori MB; Bintalib SO; Soh BLP
    Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):217-225. PubMed ID: 38035436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.