These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35366421)

  • 21. Speech Understanding and Sound Source Localization by Cochlear Implant Listeners Using a Pinna-Effect Imitating Microphone and an Adaptive Beamformer.
    Dorman MF; Natale S; Loiselle L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 29488870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Off the ear with no loss in speech understanding: comparing the RONDO and the OPUS 2 cochlear implant audio processors.
    Dazert S; Thomas JP; Büchner A; Müller J; Hempel JM; Löwenheim H; Mlynski R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 274(3):1391-1395. PubMed ID: 27909888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigating Speech Recognition and listening effort with different device configurations in adult cochlear implant users.
    Sladen DP; Nie Y; Berg K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):119-130. PubMed ID: 29457564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The efficacy of microphone directionality in improving speech recognition in noise for three commercial cochlear-implant systems.
    Sivonen V; Willberg T; Aarnisalo AA; Dietz A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 May; 21(3):153-159. PubMed ID: 32160829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of Microphone Location and Beamforming Technology on Speech Recognition in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Holder JT; Taylor AL; Sunderhaus LW; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jul; 31(7):506-512. PubMed ID: 32119817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech Perception in Quiet and Noise With an Off the Ear CI Processor Enabling Adaptive Microphone Directionality.
    Wesarg T; Voss B; Hassepass F; Beck R; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Apr; 39(4):e240-e249. PubMed ID: 29533332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Van Hoesel R; Ramsden R; Odriscoll M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 11951849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Kerber S; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. United Kingdom national paediatric bilateral project: Demographics and results of localization and speech perception testing.
    Cullington HE; Bele D; Brinton JC; Cooper S; Daft M; Harding J; Hatton N; Humphries J; Lutman ME; Maddocks J; Maggs J; Millward K; O'Donoghue G; Patel S; Rajput K; Salmon V; Sear T; Speers A; Wheeler A; Wilson K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2-22. PubMed ID: 28010679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of directionality and maximal power output on speech understanding with bone anchored hearing implants in single sided deafness.
    Krempaska S; Koval J; Schmid C; Pfiffner F; Kurz A; Kompis M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jun; 271(6):1395-400. PubMed ID: 23700268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contribution of noise reduction pre-processing and microphone directionality strategies in the speech recognition in noise in adult cochlear implant users.
    Goffi-Gomez MVS; Muniz L; Wiemes G; Onuki LC; Calonga L; Osterne FJ; Kós MI; Caldas FF; Cardoso C; Cagnacci B
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Aug; 278(8):2823-2828. PubMed ID: 32948894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using Microphone Technology to Improve Speech Perception in Noise in Children with Cochlear Implants.
    Johnstone PM; Mills KET; Humphrey E; Yeager KR; Jones E; McElligott K; Pierce A; Agrawal S; Froeling C; Little JP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Oct; 29(9):814-825. PubMed ID: 30278866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: localization and hearing in noise benefits.
    Vincent C; Bébéar JP; Radafy E; Vaneecloo FM; Ruzza I; Lautissier S; Bordure P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):858-64. PubMed ID: 22436413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Cochlear implant in children: rational, indications and cost/efficacy].
    Martini A; Bovo R; Trevisi P; Forli F; Berrettini S
    Minerva Pediatr; 2013 Jun; 65(3):325-39. PubMed ID: 23685383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of Microphone Configuration on Speech Perception of Cochlear Implant Users in Traffic Noise.
    Weissgerber T; Bandeira M; Brendel M; Stöver T; Baumann U
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e198-e205. PubMed ID: 30741896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical outcomes with the Kanso™ off-the-ear cochlear implant sound processor.
    Mauger SJ; Jones M; Nel E; Del Dot J
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Apr; 56(4):267-276. PubMed ID: 28067077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.
    Aronoff JM; Freed DJ; Fisher LM; Pal I; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.