These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35367080)
1. Effect of scan-path length on the scanning accuracy of completely dentate and partially edentulous maxillae. Waldecker M; Rues S; Behnisch R; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):146-154. PubMed ID: 35367080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In-vitro accuracy of complete arch scans of the fully dentate and the partially edentulous maxilla. Waldecker M; Bömicke W; Behnisch R; Rammelsberg P; Rues S J Prosthodont Res; 2022 Oct; 66(4):538-545. PubMed ID: 34880160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of additional reference objects on accuracy of five intraoral scanners in partially and completely edentulous jaws: An in vitro study. Rutkūnas V; Gedrimienė A; Al-Haj Husain N; Pletkus J; Barauskis D; Jegelevičius D; Özcan M J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 34799084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro accuracy of digital and conventional impressions in the partially edentulous maxilla. Waldecker M; Rues S; Awounvo Awounvo JS; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Nov; 26(11):6491-6502. PubMed ID: 35778534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study. Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 36868987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study. Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of the superimposition reference area on intraoral scanning accuracy in a partially dentate maxilla. Negm EE; Patel M; Ryan P J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):189.e1-189.e11. PubMed ID: 38556406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study. Diker B; Tak Ö J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of intraoral scanner and fixed partial denture situation on the scan accuracy of multiple implants: An in vitro study. Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 25(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 36762495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of digital complete-arch, multi-implant scans made in the edentulous jaw with gingival movement simulation: An in vitro study. Knechtle N; Wiedemeier D; Mehl A; Ender A J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):468-478. PubMed ID: 33612335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method. Nagy Z; Simon B; Mennito A; Evans Z; Renne W; Vág J BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 32264943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of Complete-Arch Implant Digital Scans: Effect of Scanning Protocol, Number of Implants, and Scan Body Splinting. Denneulin T; Rignon-Bret C; Ravalec G; Tapie L; Bouter D; Wulfman C Int J Prosthodont; 2023 May; 36(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 36288490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring the impact of the extent of the partially edentulous area on the accuracy of two intraoral scanners. Alfaraj A; Khanlar LN; Lin WS; Zandinejad A J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):163.e1-163.e8. PubMed ID: 37891042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study. Osman RB; Alharbi NM J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(9):821-828. PubMed ID: 36571837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of complete-arch implant scanning with 5 different intraoral scanners in terms of trueness and operator experience. Revell G; Simon B; Mennito A; Evans ZP; Renne W; Ludlow M; Vág J J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):632-638. PubMed ID: 33832761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study. Braian M; Wennerberg A J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):129-136.e2. PubMed ID: 30885584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of intraoral scanning in completely and partially edentulous maxillary and mandibular jaws: an in vitro analysis. Schimmel M; Akino N; Srinivasan M; Wittneben JG; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):1839-1847. PubMed ID: 32812098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do "cut out-rescan" procedures have an impact on the accuracy of intraoral digital scans? Reich S; Yatmaz B; Raith S J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 32059858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of single implant scans with a combined healing abutment-scan body system and different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study. Çakmak G; Donmez MB; Atalay S; Yilmaz H; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103773. PubMed ID: 34384842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of impression-making methods in edentulous arches: An in vitro study encompassing conventional and digital methods. Li J; Moon HS; Kim JH; Yoon HI; Oh KC J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):479-486. PubMed ID: 33583617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]