These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35367390)

  • 1. A Biomechanical Assessment of Shaken Baby Syndrome: What About the Spine?
    Davison MA; Button KD; Benzel EC; Weaver BT; Rundell SA
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jul; 163():e223-e229. PubMed ID: 35367390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frontal-oblique impact sled tests of a rearward-facing child restraint system with and without a support leg.
    Patton DA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107137. PubMed ID: 37295359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions.
    Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of concussion due to head acceleration in rear impact sled tests of passenger automobile seats.
    Courtney A; Campbell IC; Courtney E; Pasquesi SA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S133-S135. PubMed ID: 30841805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shaken baby syndrome: a biomechanics analysis of injury mechanisms.
    Bandak FA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jun; 151(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 15885948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occupant responses in conventional and ABTS seats in high-speed rear sled tests.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R; Prasad P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 28678610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can shaking alone cause fatal brain injury? A biomechanical assessment of the Duhaime shaken baby syndrome model.
    Cory CZ; Jones BM
    Med Sci Law; 2003 Oct; 43(4):317-33. PubMed ID: 14655963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protection of children in forward-facing child restraint systems during oblique side impact sled tests: Intrusion and tether effects.
    Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Kim J; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():156-62. PubMed ID: 27586117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Second-row occupant responses with and without intrusion in rear sled and crash tests.
    Parenteau CS; Viano DC; Burnett R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 33289580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pretensioner loading to rear-seat occupants during static and dynamic testing.
    Bohman K; Fredriksson R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S111-8. PubMed ID: 25307375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neck forces and moments of human volunteers and post mortem human surrogates in low-speed frontal sled tests.
    Beeman SM; Kemper AR; Duma SM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():141-9. PubMed ID: 27586115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical spine injury in rollover crashes: Anthropometry, excursion, roof deformation, and ATD prediction.
    Roberts CW; Toczyski J; Kerrigan JR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Apr; 64():42-48. PubMed ID: 29703416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical effects of a halo orthotic on a pediatric anthropomorphic test device in a simulated frontal motor vehicle collision.
    Sribnick EA; Mansfield JA; Rhodes C; Fullaway V; Bolte JH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(8):500-503. PubMed ID: 36083809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of postural support padding modifications to child restraints for children with disability on crash protection.
    Cook L; Brown J; Kent N; Whyte T; Bilston LE
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(5):741-749. PubMed ID: 38619499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lower cervical spine loading in frontal sled tests using inverse dynamics: potential applications for lower neck injury criteria.
    Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Maiman DJ
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2010 Nov; 54():133-66. PubMed ID: 21512907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frontal Crash Injury Metrics Are Below Mandated Limits for a Spica Casted Child Dummy in Currently Available Restraints.
    Collins AC; Caskey S; Peck JB; Walter N; Atkinson TS; Atkinson PJ
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2020; 40(5):e394-e400. PubMed ID: 31770168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Top tether effectiveness during side impacts.
    Majstorovic J; Bing J; Dahle E; Bolte J; Kang YS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S146-S152. PubMed ID: 29584504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of pediatric growth on cervical spine kinematics and deformations in automotive crashes.
    Alvarez VS; Kleiven S
    J Biomech; 2018 Apr; 71():76-83. PubMed ID: 29456172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Head injury metric response in finite element ATDs and a human body model in multidirectional loading regimes.
    Jones DA; Gaewsky JP; Somers JT; Gayzik FS; Weaver AA; Stitzel JD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S96-S102. PubMed ID: 31951749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shaken baby syndrome.
    Altimier L
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2008; 22(1):68-76; quiz 77-8. PubMed ID: 18287904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.