These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35368131)

  • 41. Data integration for inference about spatial processes: A model-based approach to test and account for data inconsistency.
    Tenan S; Pedrini P; Bragalanti N; Groff C; Sutherland C
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185588. PubMed ID: 28973034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Spatial capture-recapture with random thinning for unidentified encounters.
    Jiménez J; C Augustine B; Linden DW; B Chandler R; Royle JA
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Feb; 11(3):1187-1198. PubMed ID: 33598123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A local evaluation of the individual state-space to scale up Bayesian spatial capture-recapture.
    Milleret C; Dupont P; Bonenfant C; Brøseth H; Flagstad Ø; Sutherland C; Bischof R
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Jan; 9(1):352-363. PubMed ID: 30680119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Integrated population modeling of black bears in Minnesota: implications for monitoring and management.
    Fieberg JR; Shertzer KW; Conn PB; Noyce KV; Garshelis DL
    PLoS One; 2010 Aug; 5(8):e12114. PubMed ID: 20711344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An empirical evaluation of camera trapping and spatially explicit capture-recapture models for estimating chimpanzee density.
    Després-Einspenner ML; Howe EJ; Drapeau P; Kühl HS
    Am J Primatol; 2017 Jul; 79(7):. PubMed ID: 28267880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluating noninvasive genetic sampling techniques to estimate large carnivore abundance.
    Mumma MA; Zieminski C; Fuller TK; Mahoney SP; Waits LP
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Sep; 15(5):1133-44. PubMed ID: 25693632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Integrating sign surveys and telemetry data for estimating brown bear (
    Popescu VD; Iosif R; Pop MI; Chiriac S; Bouroș G; Furnas BJ
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Sep; 7(18):7134-7144. PubMed ID: 28944005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Does the punishment fit the crime? Consequences and diagnosis of misspecified detection functions in Bayesian spatial capture-recapture modeling.
    Dey S; Bischof R; Dupont PPA; Milleret C
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Feb; 12(2):e8600. PubMed ID: 35222967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An empirical demonstration of the effect of study design on density estimations.
    Nawaz MA; Khan BU; Mahmood A; Younas M; Din JU; Sutherland C
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):13104. PubMed ID: 34162926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Toward reliable population estimates of wolves by combining spatial capture-recapture models and non-invasive DNA monitoring.
    López-Bao JV; Godinho R; Pacheco C; Lema FJ; García E; Llaneza L; Palacios V; Jiménez J
    Sci Rep; 2018 Feb; 8(1):2177. PubMed ID: 29391588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sampling designs matching species biology produce accurate and affordable abundance indices.
    Harris G; Farley S; Russell GJ; Butler MJ; Selinger J
    PeerJ; 2013; 1():e227. PubMed ID: 24392290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Robustness of Eco-Epidemiological Capture-Recapture Parameter Estimates to Variation in Infection State Uncertainty.
    Benhaiem S; Marescot L; Hofer H; East ML; Lebreton JD; Kramer-Schadt S; Gimenez O
    Front Vet Sci; 2018; 5():197. PubMed ID: 30211175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Spatial capture-recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm
    Schmidt BR; Meier A; Sutherland C; Royle JA
    R Soc Open Sci; 2017 Sep; 4(9):170374. PubMed ID: 28989745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Estimating the Size of Key Populations in Kampala, Uganda: 3-Source Capture-Recapture Study.
    Doshi RH; Apodaca K; Ogwal M; Bain R; Amene E; Kiyingi H; Aluzimbi G; Musinguzi G; Serwadda D; McIntyre AF; Hladik W
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2019 Aug; 5(3):e12118. PubMed ID: 31407673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Integrating acoustic telemetry into mark-recapture models to improve the precision of apparent survival and abundance estimates.
    Dudgeon CL; Pollock KH; Braccini JM; Semmens JM; Barnett A
    Oecologia; 2015 Jul; 178(3):761-72. PubMed ID: 25740335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Demographic connectivity for ursid populations at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park.
    Sawaya MA; Clevenger AP; Kalinowski ST
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):721-30. PubMed ID: 23758532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect of sex, age, and location on carnivory in Utah black bears (Ursus americanus).
    Hatch KA; Kester KA; Auger J; Roeder BL; Bunnell K; Black HL
    Oecologia; 2019 Apr; 189(4):931-937. PubMed ID: 30989360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Estimating abundance without recaptures of marked pallid sturgeon in the Mississippi River.
    Friedenberg NA; Hoover JJ; Boysen K; Killgore KJ
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Apr; 32(2):457-465. PubMed ID: 28639329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A flexible and efficient Bayesian implementation of point process models for spatial capture-recapture data.
    Zhang W; Chipperfield JD; Illian JB; Dupont P; Milleret C; de Valpine P; Bischof R
    Ecology; 2023 Jan; 104(1):e3887. PubMed ID: 36217822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Experimental evaluation of spatial capture-recapture study design.
    Fleming J; Grant EHC; Sterrett SC; Sutherland C
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Oct; 31(7):e02419. PubMed ID: 34278637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.