These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35368164)

  • 21. Influence of different viewing conditions on the detection of fractured endodontic instruments using periapical radiographs at 3 projection angles.
    Moreira-Souza L; Gaêta-Araujo H; Lima CAS; Brasil DM; Costa ED; Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Dec; 132(6):744-750. PubMed ID: 34272189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Endodontic working length assessment. Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film.
    Cederberg RA; Tidwell E; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Mar; 85(3):325-8. PubMed ID: 9540092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Temperature increases on the external root surface during endodontic treatment using single file systems.
    Özkocak I; Taşkan MM; Gökt Rk H; Aytac F; Karaarslan EŞ
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2015; 18(5):676-80. PubMed ID: 26096249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative Study of Four Endodontic File Systems to Assess Changes in Working Length during Root Canal Instrumentation and the Effect of Canal Curvature on Working Length Change.
    Tien M; Tjoa H; Zhou M; Abbott PV
    J Endod; 2020 Jan; 46(1):110-115. PubMed ID: 31740067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measurement of the distance between the minor foramen and the anatomic apex by digital and conventional radiography.
    Melius B; Jiang J; Zhu Q
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):125-6. PubMed ID: 11833685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination.
    Woolhiser GA; Brand JW; Hoen MM; Geist JR; Pikula AA; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15772601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of Dentaport ZX apex locator in enlarged root canals.
    Ebrahim AK; Wadachi R; Suda H
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 17969287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in maxillary molars: SEM analysis.
    Vanni JR; Santos R; Limongi O; Guerisoli DM; Capelli A; Pécora JD
    Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 16429181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interpretation of endodontic file lengths using RadioVisiography.
    Leddy BJ; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
    J Endod; 1994 Nov; 20(11):542-5. PubMed ID: 7643038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of clinical experience on the radiographic determination of endodontic working length.
    Alothmani OS; Friedlander LT; Monteith BD; Chandler NP
    Int Endod J; 2013 Mar; 46(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 22882229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of success rate of endodontic treatment performed by students with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium hand files.
    Pettiette MT; Delano EO; Trope M
    J Endod; 2001 Feb; 27(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 11491636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
    Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The standardized-taper root canal preparation--Part 2. GT file selection and safe handpiece-driven file use.
    Buchanan LS
    Int Endod J; 2001 Jan; 34(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 11307382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reduction in size of digital images: does it lead to less detectability or loss of diagnostic information?
    Versteeg CH; Sanderink GC; Lobach SR; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 9656873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of Contrast Inversion Enhancement on the Accuracy of Endodontic File Length Determination in Digital Radiography.
    Farhadi N; Shokraneh A; Mehdizadeh M
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 May; 9(5):ZC102-5. PubMed ID: 26155552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of digital noise reduction on the accuracy of endodontic file length determination.
    Mehdizadeh M; Khademi AA; Shokraneh A; Farhadi N
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2013 Sep; 43(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 24083212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Apical fit of initial K-files in maxillary molars assessed by micro-computed tomography.
    Paqué F; Zehnder M; Marending M
    Int Endod J; 2010 Apr; 43(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 20487453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vivo accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in confirming root canal working length determination by Root ZX.
    Orosco FA; Bernardineli N; Garcia RB; Bramante CM; Duarte MA; Moraes IG
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2012; 20(5):522-5. PubMed ID: 23138737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.
    Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of the shaping characteristics of two nickel-titanium endodontic hand instruments.
    Dobó-Nagy C; Serbán T; Szabó J; Nagy G; Madléna M
    Int Endod J; 2002 Mar; 35(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 11985681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.