These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3536882)
1. Determination of bacterial cell volume with the Coulter Counter. Kubitschek HE; Friske JA J Bacteriol; 1986 Dec; 168(3):1466-7. PubMed ID: 3536882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of a Coulter counter to detect discrete changes in cell numbers and volume during growth of Escherichia coli. Smither R J Appl Bacteriol; 1975 Oct; 39(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 1104554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A simple, fast and inexpensive kinetic method to differentiate between total and viable bacteria using Coulter counter technique. Seydel JK; Wempe E Arzneimittelforschung; 1980; 30(2):298-301. PubMed ID: 6990935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of cephalosporin-induced changes in the volume distribution of Escherichia coli cultures by an electronic counter-channelanalyser. Schulz E; von Klitzing L; Marre R; Sack K Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1984 Dec; 258(2-3):275-82. PubMed ID: 6099670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A bioelectromagnetic model of the mechanism of the development of Escherichia coli]. Kolpakova SD Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1995; (3):70-4. PubMed ID: 7660706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Bactericidal activity and induction of cell volume alterations of cephalosporins in Escherichia coli. Schulz E; von Klitzing L; Sack K; Marre R Chemotherapy; 1985; 31(6):425-32. PubMed ID: 3908008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bacterial colony counting using the MRC image analyser. Coyne MB; Forage AJ; Paice F Phys Med Biol; 1974 Sep; 19(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 4614283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of size distributions of bacterial cells. Harvey RJ; Marr AG J Bacteriol; 1966 Oct; 92(4):805-11. PubMed ID: 5332872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effects of external biophysical factors on reproducibility of Escherichia coli characteristics]. Kolpakova SD; Kolpakov AI Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk; 1994; (7):49-53. PubMed ID: 7524854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experiences with the Coulter counter in bacteriology. SWANTON EM; CURBY WA; LIND HE Appl Microbiol; 1962 Sep; 10(5):480-5. PubMed ID: 13979635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Viable cell and electronic particle count. Anderson GE; Whitehead JA J Appl Bacteriol; 1973 Jun; 36(2):353-5. PubMed ID: 4583877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cell content of goat milk: California mastitis test, Coulter counter , and fossomatic for predicting half infection. Poutrel B; Lerondelle C J Dairy Sci; 1983 Dec; 66(12):2575-9. PubMed ID: 6365990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Bacterial counting shows effectiveness of antibiotics. A new method for quick drug testing]. Schweisheimer W Med Lab (Stuttg); 1972 Jul; 25(7):174-5. PubMed ID: 4558101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Coulter counter use in the enumeration of muscle and fat stem cells. Fernyhough ME; Helterline DL; Vierck JL; Hill RA; Dodson MV Methods Cell Sci; 2003; 25(3-4):221-5. PubMed ID: 15801168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of isolated myocyte volume using the Coulter models Z2 and ZM/C256: a comparison of instrument function. Said S; Tamura T; Gerdes AM Biotechniques; 1998 Sep; 25(3):522-5. PubMed ID: 9762450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proliferation of human lymphocytes in culture : determination by measurement of nuclear volume and cell number. Chandra P; Chanana AD; Sipe CR; Cronkite EP Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1978; 20(4):545-55. PubMed ID: 752148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Determination of bacteria count by enumeration of microcolonies with an electronic counter apparatus (author's transl)]. De Felip G; Belli M; Toti L; Falbo V Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1974; 10(3-4):215-23. PubMed ID: 4620355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical preparation of pour plates for viable bacterial counts of milk samples. Bradshaw JG; Francis DW; Peeler JT; Leslie JE; Twedt RM; Read RB J Dairy Sci; 1973 Aug; 56(8):1011-6. PubMed ID: 4581344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]