These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3536994)

  • 1. Effect of blind passage and multiple sampling on recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis from urogenital specimens.
    Jones RB; Katz BP; van der Pol B; Caine VA; Batteiger BE; Newhall WJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Dec; 24(6):1029-33. PubMed ID: 3536994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnosis by AMPLICOR PCR of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from women and men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics.
    Quinn TC; Welsh L; Lentz A; Crotchfelt K; Zenilman J; Newhall J; Gaydos C
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jun; 34(6):1401-6. PubMed ID: 8735088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of the Gen-Probe AMPLIFIED Chlamydia Trachomatis Assay in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical and urine specimens from women and urethral and urine specimens from men attending sexually transmitted disease and family planning clinics.
    Ferrero DV; Meyers HN; Schultz DE; Willis SA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3230-3. PubMed ID: 9774570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction, monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.
    Wu CH; Lee MF; Yin SC; Yang DM; Cheng SF
    Sex Transm Dis; 1992; 19(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 1411833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors related to genital Chlamydia trachomatis and its diagnosis by culture in a sexually transmitted disease clinic.
    Magder LS; Harrison HR; Ehret JM; Anderson TS; Judson FN
    Am J Epidemiol; 1988 Aug; 128(2):298-308. PubMed ID: 3394697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multicenter evaluation of the fully automated COBAS AMPLICOR PCR test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.
    Vincelette J; Schirm J; Bogard M; Bourgault AM; Luijt DS; Bianchi A; van Voorst Vader PC; Butcher A; Rosenstraus M
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jan; 37(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 9854067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from men and women as an alternative to swabs.
    Tchoudomirova K; Tchapanova A; Nouchov F
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 1997; 39(4):30-6. PubMed ID: 9575647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Puolakkainen M; Hiltunen-Back E; Reunala T; Suhonen S; Lähteenmäki P; Lehtinen M; Paavonen J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jun; 36(6):1489-93. PubMed ID: 9620366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative culture of endocervical Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Barnes RC; Katz BP; Rolfs RT; Batteiger B; Caine V; Jones RB
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Apr; 28(4):774-80. PubMed ID: 2332471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine collected from men and women attending a venereal clinic.
    Genç M; Stary A; Bergman S; Mårdh PA
    APMIS; 1991 May; 99(5):455-9. PubMed ID: 2043357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by ligase chain reaction compared with polymerase chain reaction and cell culture in urogenital specimens.
    de Barbeyrac B; Rodriguez P; Dutilh B; Le Roux P; Bébéar C
    Genitourin Med; 1995 Dec; 71(6):382-6. PubMed ID: 8566978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infections.
    Monno R; De Vito D; Vena GA; Mosca A; Miragliotta G
    Microbiologica; 1987 Oct; 10(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3320688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chlamydia trachomatis in women: the more you look, the more you find.
    Hay PE; Thomas BJ; Horner PJ; MacLeod E; Renton AM; Taylor-Robinson D
    Genitourin Med; 1994 Apr; 70(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 8206484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of differences in specimen processing and passage technique on recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Jones RB; Van Der Pol B; Katz BP
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 May; 27(5):894-8. PubMed ID: 2745697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of antigen detection, polymerase chain reaction and culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infection.
    Hallsworth PG; Hefford C; Waddell RG; Gordon DL
    Pathology; 1995 Apr; 27(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 7567147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of cervical, urethral, and urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
    Sellors JW; Mahony JB; Jang D; Pickard L; Goldsmith CH; Gafni A; Chernesky MA
    J Infect Dis; 1991 Jul; 164(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 2056207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chlamydia trachomatis PCR (Cobas Amplicor) in women: endocervical specimen transported in a specimen of urine versus endocervical and urethral specimens in 2-SP medium versus urine specimen only.
    Airell A; Ottosson L; Bygdeman SM; Carlberg H; Lidbrink P; Rudén AK; Elfgren K
    Int J STD AIDS; 2000 Oct; 11(10):651-8. PubMed ID: 11057936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Chlamydia trachomatis: detection using a direct test and culture in 100 genital specimens].
    Dutilh B; Bebear C
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1985; 43(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 3896054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the ligase chain reaction with cell culture for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.
    Ridgway GL; Mumtaz G; Robinson AJ; Franchini M; Carder C; Burczak J; Lee H
    J Clin Pathol; 1996 Feb; 49(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 8655675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of transcription-mediated amplification and ligase chain reaction assays for detection of chlamydial infection in urogenital samples obtained by invasive and noninvasive methods.
    Stary A; Schuh E; Kerschbaumer M; Götz B; Lee H
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Sep; 36(9):2666-70. PubMed ID: 9705411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.