195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35370021)
21. Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy.
Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Marra G; Moschini M; Martini A; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Afferi L; Rakauskas A; Gontero P; Mattei A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 3(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 32847747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy to Transperineal Template Mapping Biopsies Stratified by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score in the PROMIS Trial.
Lovegrove CE; Miah S; El-Shater Bosaily A; Bott S; Brown L; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Freeman A; Henderson A; Hindley R; Kaplan R; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Persad R; Punwani S; Rosario D; Shergill I; Winkler M; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
J Urol; 2020 Jan; 203(1):100-107. PubMed ID: 31335254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can quantitative analysis of multi-parametric MRI independently predict failure of focal salvage HIFU therapy in men with radio-recurrent prostate cancer?
Rakauskas A; Shah TT; Peters M; Randeva JS; Hosking-Jervis F; Schmainda MJ; Orczyck C; Emberton M; Arya M; Moore C; Ahmed HU
Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 39(12):830.e1-830.e8. PubMed ID: 34049783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The PICTURE study: diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men requiring a repeat prostate biopsy.
Simmons LAM; Kanthabalan A; Arya M; Briggs T; Barratt D; Charman SC; Freeman A; Gelister J; Hawkes D; Hu Y; Jameson C; McCartan N; Moore CM; Punwani S; Ramachandran N; van der Meulen J; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
Br J Cancer; 2017 Apr; 116(9):1159-1165. PubMed ID: 28350785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Focal salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound in radiorecurrent prostate cancer.
Kanthabalan A; Peters M; Van Vulpen M; McCartan N; Hindley RG; Emara A; Moore CM; Arya M; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
BJU Int; 2017 Aug; 120(2):246-256. PubMed ID: 28258616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Two-year Outcomes Following Focal Laser Ablation of Localized Prostate Cancer.
Chao B; Llukani E; Lepor H
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):129-133. PubMed ID: 31100236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Systematic and MRI-Cognitive Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Accuracy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after Previous Negative Biopsy and Persisting Suspicion of Malignancy.
Vėželis A; Platkevičius G; Kinčius M; Gumbys L; Naruševičiūtė I; Briedienė R; Petroška D; Ulys A; Jankevičius F
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Jan; 57(1):. PubMed ID: 33435132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Cancer detection rate of prebiopsy MRI with subsequent systematic and targeted biopsy are superior to non-targeting systematic biopsy without MRI in biopsy naïve patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Washino S; Kobayashi S; Okochi T; Kameda T; Konoshi T; Miyagawa T; Takayama T; Morita T
BMC Urol; 2018 May; 18(1):51. PubMed ID: 29843694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Salvage Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation for Localized Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: 12-Month Functional and Oncological Results.
Anttinen M; Mäkelä P; Viitala A; Nurminen P; Suomi V; Sainio T; Saunavaara J; Taimen P; Sequeiros RB; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2020 Dec; 22():79-87. PubMed ID: 34337481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is an Independent Predictor of Salvage Radiotherapy Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy.
Sharma V; Nehra A; Colicchia M; Westerman ME; Kawashima A; Froemming AT; Kwon ED; Mynderse LA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2018 Jun; 73(6):879-887. PubMed ID: 29195777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy versus Transperineal Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy in the Detection of Localised Radio-recurrent Prostate Cancer.
Kanthabalan A; Abd-Alazeez M; Arya M; Allen C; Freeman A; Jameson C; Kirkham A; Mitra AV; Payne H; Punwani S; Ramachandran N; Walkden M; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2016 Sep; 28(9):568-76. PubMed ID: 27318423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Focal Ablation Targeted to the Index Lesion in Multifocal Localised Prostate Cancer: a Prospective Development Study.
Ahmed HU; Dickinson L; Charman S; Weir S; McCartan N; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham AP; Sahu M; Scott R; Allen C; Van der Meulen J; Emberton M
Eur Urol; 2015 Dec; 68(6):927-36. PubMed ID: 25682339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Versus Systematic Prostate Biopsies: 2-year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial (PRECISE).
Klotz L; Chin J; Black PC; Finelli A; Anidjar M; Machado A; Levental M; Ghai S; Chang SD; Patel C; Kassam Z; Loblaw A; Kebabdjian M; Pond G; Haider MA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Jun; 7(3):456-461. PubMed ID: 37838556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Multicentre Analysis of the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Following Transperineal Image-fusion Targeted and Nontargeted Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men at Risk.
Miah S; Hosking-Jervis F; Connor MJ; Eldred-Evans D; Shah TT; Arya M; Barber N; Bhardwa J; Bott S; Burke D; Doherty A; Foster C; Freeman A; Hindley R; Jameson C; Karim O; Laniado M; Montgomery B; Nigam R; Punwani S; Sinclair A; Winkler M; Allen C; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Jun; 3(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 31411968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
Kanoun S; Walker P; Vrigneaud JM; Depardon E; Barbier V; Humbert O; Moulin M; Créhange G; Cormier L; Loffroy R; Brunotte F; Cochet A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Apr; 97(5):986-994. PubMed ID: 28333020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
