These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3537141)

  • 21. Comparison of percent free prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density as methods to enhance prostate specific antigen specificity in early prostate cancer detection in men with normal rectal examination and prostate specific antigen between 4.1 and 10 ng./ml.
    Morote J; Raventós CX; Lorente JA; Lopez-Pacios MA; Encabo G; de Torres I; Andreu J
    J Urol; 1997 Aug; 158(2):502-4. PubMed ID: 9224333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The incidence of the variability of the free PSA/total PSA ratio on the early diagnosis of prostate cancer].
    de La Taille A; Houlgatte A; Houdelette P; Berlizot P; Fournier R; Ricordel I
    Prog Urol; 1997 Jun; 7(3):455-63. PubMed ID: 9273075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prostate cancer detection with digital rectal examination, prostate-specific antigen, transrectal ultrasonography and biopsy in clinical urological practice.
    Ng TK; Vasilareas D; Mitterdorfer AJ; Maher PO; Lalak A
    BJU Int; 2005 Mar; 95(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 15705077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Diagnosis of early prostatic cancer. Correlation of in vitro echography and histopathologic mapping].
    Fornage BD; Babaian RJ; Troncoso P
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 2692503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of normal prostate tissue, chronic prostatitis, and prostate cancer by quantitative perfusion analysis using a dynamic contrast-enhanced inversion-prepared dual-contrast gradient echo sequence.
    Franiel T; Lüdemann L; Rudolph B; Rehbein H; Staack A; Taupitz M; Prochnow D; Beyersdorff D
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Jul; 43(7):481-7. PubMed ID: 18580330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Non-palpable prostatic cancer. Cure with adenomectomy?].
    Cambronero Santos J; Carrero López V; Ortiz Vico FJ; Calahorra Fernández L; Rodríguez Antolín A; Passas Martínez J; Leiva Galvis O
    Actas Urol Esp; 1996 Apr; 20(4):346-50. PubMed ID: 8801795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Model of screening for prostatic cancer among patients with prostate specific antigen concentration of 4-10 ng/ml in blood].
    Karazanashvili GG; Managadze LG
    Urologiia; 2000; (6):37-41. PubMed ID: 11186321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Diagnostic value of 10 systematized and ultrasound-guided transrectal prostatic biopsies].
    Ravery V; Billebaud T; Toublanc M; Boccon-Gibod L; Hermieu JF; Moulinier F; Blanc E; Delmas V; Boccon-Gibod L
    Prog Urol; 1998 Dec; 8(6):1012-7. PubMed ID: 9894260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Suprapubic ultrasonic diagnosis of the prostate].
    Gardellin G; Perin B; Bighi G; Montante G; De Belvis A
    Radiol Med; 1986 Sep; 72(9):648-51. PubMed ID: 2429346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Transrectal ultrasonography of the prostate (author's transl)].
    Chapelon JY; Fourcade C; Cathignol D; Devonec M; Dubernard JM; Sarkissian J; Kamel G
    Nouv Presse Med; 1981 Nov; 10(42):3491-2. PubMed ID: 6171770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Ultrasonographic concept of the central prostate. Value of the endorectal approach].
    Dana A; Michel JR
    Ann Urol (Paris); 1988; 22(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 3289478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Endorectal ultrasonic study of the prostate].
    Vasileva Zh; Petrov P; Tsolov Ts
    Khirurgiia (Sofiia); 1989; 42(4):76-81. PubMed ID: 2685449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prostatic ultrasound.
    Clements R; Griffiths GJ
    Br J Hosp Med; 1987 Dec; 38(6):549-52. PubMed ID: 3325122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Recognition of the pattern in ultrasonic sectional pictures of the prostate for tumor diagnosis.
    Wessels G; von Seelen W; Gaca A; Loch E; Scheiding W; Lorenz H
    Med Prog Technol; 1979 Jan; 6(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 431508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How accurate is the index finger? A comparison of digital and ultrasound examination of the prostatic nodule.
    Clements R; Griffiths GJ; Peeling WB; Roberts EE; Evans KT
    Clin Radiol; 1988 Jan; 39(1):87-9. PubMed ID: 3276434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Comparison of digital and sonographic rectal examination in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the prostate].
    Scheinar J; Zát'ura F
    Rozhl Chir; 1990 Nov; 69(11):730-6. PubMed ID: 2136436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative study of suprapubic sonography and computed tomography for staging of prostatic carcinoma.
    Denkhaus H; Dierkopf W; Grabbe E; Donn F
    Urol Radiol; 1983; 5(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 6836785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Who pays attention to the prostate?].
    Pols J
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1989 Dec; 133(50):2521. PubMed ID: 2594126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Comparison of transabdominal and intrarectal ultrasonic studies in prostatic diseases].
    Kovács A; Harkányi Z
    Orv Hetil; 1989 May; 130(22):1163-6. PubMed ID: 2668842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Qualification and quality control in sonography].
    Loch EG; Bönhof J; Böttcher D; Hausen W; Hammes P; Linhart P; Nauth P; Pfannenstiel P; Schmarsow R; Utech C
    Ultraschall Med; 1985 Oct; 6(5):250-4. PubMed ID: 3909396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.