These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35372144)

  • 1. Accuracy and Trending Ability of Electrical Biosensing Technology for Non-invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Neonates: A Systematic Qualitative Review.
    Van Wyk L; Gupta S; Lawrenson J; de Boode WP
    Front Pediatr; 2022; 10():851850. PubMed ID: 35372144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bioreactance Cardiac Output Trending Ability in Preterm Infants: A Single Centre, Longitudinal Study.
    Van Wyk L; Smith J; Lawrenson J; Lombard CJ; de Boode WP
    Neonatology; 2021; 118(5):600-608. PubMed ID: 34518489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrical velocimetry has limited accuracy and precision and moderate trending ability compared with transthoracic echocardiography for cardiac output measurement during cesarean delivery: A prospective observational study.
    Feng SM; Liu J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Aug; 99(34):e21914. PubMed ID: 32846858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy, Precision, and Trending Ability of Uncalibrated Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis of Cardiac Output in Patients With Impaired Left Ventricular Function: A Prospective, Observational Study.
    Montenij LJ; Sonneveld JP; Nierich AP; Buhre WF; De Waal EE
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2016 Jan; 30(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 26520028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiac Output Measurement in Neonates and Children Using Noninvasive Electrical Bioimpedance Compared With Standard Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Mansfield RC; Kaza N; Charalambous A; Milne AC; Sathiyamurthy S; Banerjee J
    Crit Care Med; 2022 Jan; 50(1):126-137. PubMed ID: 34325447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Bioimpedance Versus Pulse Contour Analysis for Intraoperative Cardiac Index Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Kidney Transplantation.
    Aditianingsih D; Hidayat J; Ginting VM
    Anesth Pain Med; 2021 Oct; 11(5):e117918. PubMed ID: 35075410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Agreement of Cardiac Output Measurements between Bioreactance and Transthoracic Echocardiography in Preterm Infants during the Transitional Phase: A Single-Centre, Prospective Study.
    Van Wyk L; Smith J; Lawrenson J; de Boode WP
    Neonatology; 2020; 117(3):271-278. PubMed ID: 32114576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiac Output Measurements Based on the Pulse Wave Transit Time and Thoracic Impedance Exhibit Limited Agreement With Thermodilution Method During Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.
    Magliocca A; Rezoagli E; Anderson TA; Burns SM; Ichinose F; Chitilian HV
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 126(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 28598912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring by electrical cardiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sanders M; Servaas S; Slagt C
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Jun; 34(3):433-460. PubMed ID: 31175501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring devices in perioperative medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis†.
    Joosten A; Desebbe O; Suehiro K; Murphy LS; Essiet M; Alexander B; Fischer MO; Barvais L; Van Obbergh L; Maucort-Boulch D; Cannesson M
    Br J Anaesth; 2017 Mar; 118(3):298-310. PubMed ID: 28203792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Neonates.
    O'Neill R; Dempsey EM; Garvey AA; Schwarz CE
    Front Pediatr; 2020; 8():614585. PubMed ID: 33585366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiac output assessment in pregnancy: comparison of two automated monitors with echocardiography.
    Vinayagam D; Patey O; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 26970353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output.
    Critchley LA; Lee A; Ho AM
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Nov; 111(5):1180-92. PubMed ID: 20736431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the ability of two continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output: estimated continuous cardiac output measured by modified pulse wave transit time and an arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.
    Terada T; Oiwa A; Maemura Y; Robert S; Kessoku S; Ochiai R
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 26370094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic review of cardiac output measurements by echocardiography vs. thermodilution: the techniques are not interchangeable.
    Wetterslev M; Møller-Sørensen H; Johansen RR; Perner A
    Intensive Care Med; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1223-33. PubMed ID: 26932349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurate and precise method for estimating cardiac output in the critically ill patient.
    Mercado P; Maizel J; Beyls C; Titeca-Beauport D; Joris M; Kontar L; Riviere A; Bonef O; Soupison T; Tribouilloy C; de Cagny B; Slama M
    Crit Care; 2017 Jun; 21(1):136. PubMed ID: 28595621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing the Mutual Interchangeability of ECOM, FloTrac/Vigileo, 3D-TEE, and ITD-PAC Cardiac Output Measuring Systems in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
    Milam AJ; Ghoddoussi F; Lucaj J; Narreddy S; Kumar N; Reddy V; Hakim J; Krishnan SH
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2021 Feb; 35(2):514-529. PubMed ID: 32622708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimated continuous cardiac output based on pulse wave transit time in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution.
    Smetkin AA; Hussain A; Fot EV; Zakharov VI; Izotova NN; Yudina AS; Dityateva ZA; Gromova YV; Kuzkov VV; Bjertnæs LJ; Kirov MY
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Apr; 31(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 26951494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of Continuous Cardiac Output Measurement With the LiDCOplus System During Intra-Aortic Counterpulsation After Cardiac Surgery.
    Menger J; Mora B; Skhirtladze K; Fischer A; Jan Ankersmit H; Dworschak M
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2016 Jun; 30(3):592-8. PubMed ID: 26718662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.