These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35372701)
41. Perceived caring attributes and priorities of preregistration nursing students throughout a nursing curriculum underpinned by person-centredness. Cook NF; McCance T; McCormack B; Barr O; Slater P J Clin Nurs; 2018 Jul; 27(13-14):2847-2858. PubMed ID: 29516650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Steps toward preregistration of research on research integrity. Sijtsma K; Emons WHM; Steneck NH; Bouter LM Res Integr Peer Rev; 2021 Mar; 6(1):5. PubMed ID: 33648609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Tackling publication bias and selective reporting in health informatics research: register your eHealth trials in the International eHealth Studies Registry. Eysenbach G J Med Internet Res; 2004 Sep; 6(3):e35. PubMed ID: 15471761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Liver resection surgery compared with thermal ablation in high surgical risk patients with colorectal liver metastases: the LAVA international RCT. Davidson B; Gurusamy K; Corrigan N; Croft J; Ruddock S; Pullan A; Brown J; Twiddy M; Birtwistle J; Morris S; Woodward N; Bandula S; Hochhauser D; Prasad R; Olde Damink S; Coolson M; Laarhoven KV; de Wilt JH Health Technol Assess; 2020 Apr; 24(21):1-38. PubMed ID: 32370822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The fate of urological systematic reviews registered in PROSPERO. Khaleel S; Cleveland B; Kalapara A; Sathianathen N; Balaji P; Dahm P World J Urol; 2020 Nov; 38(11):2981-2986. PubMed ID: 31784773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations. Bakker M; Veldkamp CLS; van Assen MALM; Crompvoets EAV; Ong HH; Nosek BA; Soderberg CK; Mellor D; Wicherts JM PLoS Biol; 2020 Dec; 18(12):e3000937. PubMed ID: 33296358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. On the Use and Misuses of Preregistration: A Reply to Klonsky (2024). Vize CE; Phillips NL; Miller JD; Lynam DR Assessment; 2024 Sep; ():10731911241275256. PubMed ID: 39258834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The fate of prospective spine studies registered on www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Ohnmeiss DD Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):487-91. PubMed ID: 25315132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Selective reporting bias due to discrepancies between registered and published outcomes in osteoarthritis trials. Krsticevic M; Saric D; Saric F; Slapnicar E; Boric K; Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Kegalj MJ; Puljak L J Comp Eff Res; 2019 Nov; 8(15):1265-1273. PubMed ID: 31739691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Experimental design and reporting standards for improving the internal validity of pre-clinical studies in the field of pain: Consensus of the IMI-Europain consortium. Knopp KL; Stenfors C; Baastrup C; Bannon AW; Calvo M; Caspani O; Currie G; Finnerup NB; Huang W; Kennedy JD; Lefevre I; Machin I; Macleod M; Rees H; Rice ASC; Rutten K; Segerdahl M; Serra J; Wodarski R; Berge OG; Treede RD Scand J Pain; 2015 Apr; 7(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 29911603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture. Won J; Kim S; Bae I; Lee H PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223305. PubMed ID: 31581278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Registration of observational studies: it is time to comply with the Declaration of Helsinki requirement]. Dal-Ré R; Delgado M; Bolumar F Gac Sanit; 2015; 29(3):228-31. PubMed ID: 25433766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols. Farrah K; Young K; Tunis MC; Zhao L Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):280. PubMed ID: 31730014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Quality of reporting in systematic reviews published in dermatology journals. Croitoru DO; Huang Y; Kurdina A; Chan AW; Drucker AM Br J Dermatol; 2020 Jun; 182(6):1469-1476. PubMed ID: 31529461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Are Preregistration and Registered Reports Vulnerable to Hacking? Bian J; Min JS; Prosperi M; Wang M Epidemiology; 2020 May; 31(3):e32. PubMed ID: 31985501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Reducing bias in secondary data analysis via an Explore and Confirm Analysis Workflow (ECAW): a proposal and survey of observational researchers. Thibault RT; Kovacs M; Hardwicke TE; Sarafoglou A; Ioannidis JPA; Munafò MR R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Oct; 10(10):230568. PubMed ID: 37830032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Trials registration: a new era in Thailand. Kulvichit K; Tulvatana W; Thinkhamrop B; Tatsanavivat P J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Oct; 96(10):1385-7. PubMed ID: 24350423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Song F; Parekh S; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder J; Sutton AJ; Hing C; Kwok CS; Pang C; Harvey I Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. PubMed ID: 20181324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research: A meta-epidemiological study. Ayorinde AA; Williams I; Mannion R; Song F; Skrybant M; Lilford RJ; Chen YF PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227580. PubMed ID: 31999702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of noninferiority margins reported in protocols and publications showed incomplete and inconsistent reporting. Dekkers OM; Cevallos M; Bührer J; Poncet A; Ackermann Rau S; Perneger TV; Egger M J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 25450451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]