BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3537650)

  • 1. Current status of circulatory support with an intra-aortic balloon pump.
    Bolooki H
    Med Instrum; 1986; 20(5):266-76. PubMed ID: 3537650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current status of circulatory support with an intra-aortic balloon pump.
    Bolooki H
    Cardiol Clin; 1985 Feb; 3(1):123-33. PubMed ID: 2935252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Thiele H; Sick P; Boudriot E; Diederich KW; Hambrecht R; Niebauer J; Schuler G
    Eur Heart J; 2005 Jul; 26(13):1276-83. PubMed ID: 15734771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Short and intermediate term clinical outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with aortic counterpulsation].
    Fornaro G; Prando MD; Parodi F; Cordero G; Sansa M; Bongo AS; Campi A; Aralda D; Dellavesa P; Aina F; Lazzero M; Cernigliaro C
    G Ital Cardiol; 1996 Dec; 26(12):1385-99. PubMed ID: 9162668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Our personal experience with intra-aortic balloon pumping.
    Skotnicki S; Vincent J; Moulijn A; Lacquet L; Kuijpers P
    Acta Chir Belg; 1978; 77(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 706961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (author's transl)].
    Yacoub MH; De Gasperis C
    G Ital Cardiol; 1978 May; 8(5):528-33. PubMed ID: 669111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemodynamic effects of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the prospective, randomized IABP shock trial.
    Prondzinsky R; Unverzagt S; Russ M; Lemm H; Swyter M; Wegener N; Buerke U; Raaz U; Ebelt H; Schlitt A; Heinroth K; Haerting J; Werdan K; Buerke M
    Shock; 2012 Apr; 37(4):378-84. PubMed ID: 22266974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Percutaneous mechanical cardiac assist in myocardial infarction. Where are we now, where are we going?
    Sjauw KD; Engström AE; Henriques JP
    Acute Card Care; 2007; 9(4):222-30. PubMed ID: 17926150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: rationale, application and results.
    Amsterdam EA; Awan NA; Lee G; Low R; Joye JA; Foerster J; Rendig S; Mason DT
    Cardiovasc Clin; 1981; 11(3):79-96. PubMed ID: 7011557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Successful combined use of Impella Recover 2.5 device and intra-aortic balloon pump support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction.
    Wiktor DM; Sawlani N; Kanthi Y; Sipahi I; Fang JC; Blitz A
    ASAIO J; 2010; 56(6):519-21. PubMed ID: 20938341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: role of mechanical circulatory support.
    Aggarwal S; Slaughter MS
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2008 Oct; 6(9):1223-35. PubMed ID: 18939910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra-aortic balloon pump therapy.
    Purcell JA; Pippin L; Mitchell M
    Am J Nurs; 1983 May; 83(5):775-96. PubMed ID: 6552147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraaortic balloon pumping in patients with right ventricular insufficiency after cardiac surgery: parameters to predict failure of IABP Support.
    Boeken U; Feindt P; Litmathe J; Kurt M; Gams E
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Sep; 57(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 19707972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changing patterns of intra-aortic balloon pump assistance.
    Weisel RD; Goldman BS; Teasdale S; Baigrie RS
    Can J Surg; 1978 Mar; 21(2):125-9, 132. PubMed ID: 305276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changing practice patterns in the management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: elderly compared with younger patients.
    Dzavík V; Burton JR; Kee C; Teo KK; Ignaszewski A; Lucas AR; Tymchak WJ
    Can J Cardiol; 1998 Jul; 14(7):923-30. PubMed ID: 9706277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock.
    Burkhoff D; Cohen H; Brunckhorst C; O'Neill WW;
    Am Heart J; 2006 Sep; 152(3):469.e1-8. PubMed ID: 16923414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro comparison of support capabilities of intra-aortic balloon pump and Impella 2.5 left percutaneous.
    Schampaert S; van't Veer M; van de Vosse FN; Pijls NH; de Mol BA; Rutten MC
    Artif Organs; 2011 Sep; 35(9):893-901. PubMed ID: 21819436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Assisted circulation (3): indications, results, and complications of IABP (intra-aortic balloon pumping)].
    Ida T
    Kurinikaru Sutadi; 1984 Sep; 5(9):1034-7. PubMed ID: 6567751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experience with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in a community hospital.
    Bass J; Katzman L; Pois AJ
    Am Surg; 1978 Jun; 44(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 677565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical experiences with intra-aortic balloon pumping].
    Moccetti T; Riva A; Clara F; Tartini R; Naegeli U; Molo C; Rondi L
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1982 Sep; 112(37):1286-9. PubMed ID: 7146849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.