169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35377093)
1. Beads phantom for evaluating heterogeneity of SUV on
Okuda K; Saito H; Yamashita S; Yamamoto H; Ichikawa H; Kato T; Yokoyama K; Doai M; Hashimoto M; Matoba M
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 May; 36(5):495-503. PubMed ID: 35377093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Texture Feature Comparison Between Step-and-Shoot and Continuous-Bed-Motion
Yamashita S; Okuda K; Nakaichi T; Yamamoto H; Yokoyama K
J Nucl Med Technol; 2021 Mar; 49(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 33020230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms.
Altazi BA; Zhang GG; Fernandez DC; Montejo ME; Hunt D; Werner J; Biagioli MC; Moros EG
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):32-48. PubMed ID: 28891217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Image Reconstruction Settings on Texture Features in 18F-FDG PET.
Yan J; Chu-Shern JL; Loi HY; Khor LK; Sinha AK; Quek ST; Tham IW; Townsend D
J Nucl Med; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1667-73. PubMed ID: 26229145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of
Manabe O; Ohira H; Hirata K; Hayashi S; Naya M; Tsujino I; Aikawa T; Koyanagawa K; Oyama-Manabe N; Tomiyama Y; Magota K; Yoshinaga K; Tamaki N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jun; 46(6):1240-1247. PubMed ID: 30327855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of optimal regularization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction of brain PET images using [
Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Kamitaka Y; Koike E; Yamao T; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Nezu S; Sugamata Y; Miyaji N; Imabayashi E; Ishibashi K; Toyohara J; Ishii K
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2995-3005. PubMed ID: 35246870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of respiratory motion on
Chen YH; Kan KY; Liu SH; Lin HH; Lue KH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 24(12):e14200. PubMed ID: 37937706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability of
Crandall JP; Fraum TJ; Lee M; Jiang L; Grigsby P; Wahl RL
J Nucl Med; 2021 May; 62(5):707-715. PubMed ID: 33008931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters.
Galavis PE; Hollensen C; Jallow N; Paliwal B; Jeraj R
Acta Oncol; 2010 Oct; 49(7):1012-6. PubMed ID: 20831489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A multi-modality physical phantom for mimicking tumor heterogeneity patterns in PET/CT and PET/MRI.
Valladares A; Beyer T; Papp L; Salomon E; Rausch I
Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 49(9):5819-5829. PubMed ID: 35838056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of image quality between step-and-shoot and continuous bed motion techniques in whole-body
Yamashita S; Yamamoto H; Nakaichi T; Yoneyama T; Yokoyama K
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 31(9):686-695. PubMed ID: 28815414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interchangeability of radiomic features between [18F]-FDG PET/CT and [18F]-FDG PET/MR.
Vuong D; Tanadini-Lang S; Huellner MW; Veit-Haibach P; Unkelbach J; Andratschke N; Kraft J; Guckenberger M; Bogowicz M
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1677-1685. PubMed ID: 30714158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of different reconstruction algorithms and setting parameters on radiomics features of PSMA PET images: A preliminary study.
Fooladi M; Soleymani Y; Rahmim A; Farzanefar S; Aghahosseini F; Seyyedi N; Sh Zadeh P
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Mar; 172():111349. PubMed ID: 38310673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards guidelines to harmonize textural features in PET: Haralick textural features vary with image noise, but exposure-invariant domains enable comparable PET radiomics.
Prenosil GA; Weitzel T; Fürstner M; Hentschel M; Krause T; Cumming P; Rominger A; Klaeser B
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229560. PubMed ID: 32176698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design and evaluation of a modular multimodality imaging phantom to simulate heterogeneous uptake and enhancement patterns for radiomic quantification in hybrid imaging: A feasibility study.
Kalisvaart GM; van Velden FHP; Hernández-Girón I; Meijer KM; Ghesquiere-Dierickx LMH; Brink WM; Webb A; de Geus-Oei LF; Slump CH; Kuznetsov DV; Schaart DR; Grootjans W
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3093-3106. PubMed ID: 35178781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of maximum likelihood and conventional PET scatter scaling methods for
Bal H; Kiser JW; Conti M; Bowen SL
Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4218-4228. PubMed ID: 34013586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of reproducible radiomic features from on-board volumetric images: A multi-institutional phantom study.
Adachi T; Nakamura M; Iramina H; Matsumoto K; Ishihara Y; Tachibana H; Kurokawa S; Cho S; Tanaka K; Fukumoto K; Nishiyama T; Kito S; Mizowaki T
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5585-5596. PubMed ID: 36932977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of image reconstruction conditions with phantoms for brain FDG and amyloid PET imaging.
Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Nishida H; Ohnishi A; Aita K; Sasaki M; Sasaki M; Senda M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 30(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 26337533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robustness of [
Palomino-Fernández D; Seiffert AP; Gómez-Grande A; Jiménez López-Guarch C; Moreno G; Bueno H; Gómez EJ; Sánchez-González P
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Feb; 244():107981. PubMed ID: 38154326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]