These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35378314)
1. Humeral offset as a predictor of outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Carrazana-Suarez LF; Panico LC; Smolinski MP; Blake RJ; McCroskey MA; Sykes JB; Lin A J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Jun; 31(6S):S158-S165. PubMed ID: 35378314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early restoration of shoulder function in patients with the Grammont prosthesis compared to lateralized humeral design in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Lee JH; Chun YM; Kim DS; Lee DH; Shin SJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Nov; 30(11):2533-2542. PubMed ID: 33813010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mid-term comparative study between the glenoid and humerus lateralization designs for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: which lateralization design is better? Lee HH; Park SE; Ji JH; Jun HS BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Apr; 24(1):290. PubMed ID: 37059977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcomes related to glenosphere overhang in reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a lateralized humeral design. Dean EW; Dean NE; Wright TW; Hao KA; Schoch BS; Farmer KW; Struk AM; King JJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2106-2115. PubMed ID: 35472577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome? Holschen M; Kiriazis A; Bockmann B; Schulte TL; Witt KA; Steinbeck J Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):307-315. PubMed ID: 33880654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Lateralization Design on Scapular Notching: A Single-Surgeon Experience. Schoch BS; Taba H; Aibinder W; King JJ; Wright TW Orthopedics; 2020 Nov; 43(6):e585-e591. PubMed ID: 32818286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of 145° onlay curved stem versus 155° inlay straight stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and radiographic results with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Giordano MC; Corona K; Morris BJ; Mocini F; Saturnino L; Cerciello S J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2089-2095. PubMed ID: 35430369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical results of bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an onlay 145° curved stem in patients with cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative study. Franceschetti E; Ranieri R; Giovanetti de Sanctis E; Palumbo A; Franceschi F J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jan; 29(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 31401130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of subscapularis repair in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty depends on the design of the implant: a comparative study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Mocini F; Cerciello S; Corona K; Morris BJ; Saturnino L; Giordano MC Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Jan; 144(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 37596498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lateralized versus nonlateralized glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Nunes B; Linhares D; Costa F; Neves N; Claro R; Silva MR J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1700-1713. PubMed ID: 33160029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medialized vs. lateralized humeral implant in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the comparison of outcomes in pseudoparalysis with massive rotator cuff tear. Youn SM; Lee HS; Rhee SM; Rhee YG J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Apr; 31(4):736-746. PubMed ID: 34543745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a descriptive analysis of different implants in current practice. Werthel JD; Walch G; Vegehan E; Deransart P; Sanchez-Sotelo J; Valenti P Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2349-2360. PubMed ID: 31254018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]