These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35378471)

  • 1. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection in nasopharyngeal swab, saliva, and gargle samples.
    Genelhoud G; Adamoski D; Spalanzani RN; Bochnia-Bueno L; de Oliveira JC; Gradia DF; Bonatto AC; Wassem R; Raboni SM; Nogueira MB; de Araujo-Souza PS
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2022 Jun; 103(2):115678. PubMed ID: 35378471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simple concentration method enables the use of gargle and mouthwash instead of nasopharyngeal swab sampling for the diagnosis of COVID-19 by PCR.
    Kocagoz T; Can O; Yurttutan Uyar N; Aksoy E; Polat T; Cankaya D; Karakus B; Mozioglu E; Kocagoz S
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2021 Dec; 40(12):2617-2622. PubMed ID: 34448088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection with the Cobas® 6800/8800 system on gargle samples using two sample processing methods with combined oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal swab.
    Benoit P; Labbé AC; Lalancette L; Gagnon S; Bonneau E; Lavallée C; Roger M; Fafard J; Dumaresq J; Beauchemin S; Coutlée F;
    J Med Virol; 2021 Dec; 93(12):6837-6840. PubMed ID: 34324212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. User acceptability of saliva and gargle samples for identifying COVID-19 positive high-risk workers and household contacts.
    McLennan K; Barton E; Lang C; Adams IR; McAllister G; Reijns MAM; Templeton K; Johannessen I; Leckie A; Gilbert N
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2022 Sep; 104(1):115732. PubMed ID: 35728458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gargle lavage & saliva: Feasible & cheaper alternatives to nasal & throat swabs for diagnosis of COVID-19.
    Gupta A; Mittal A; Dhakad S; Brijwal M; Soneja M; Srigyan D; Xess A; Kumar A; Ray A; Meena VP; Garg RK; Singh K; Desai D; Chowdhury M; Chowdhury S; Sharma K; Narayan A; Krishnan GR; Naik S; Dar L; Pandey RM; Pandey S; Sinha S; Wig N
    Indian J Med Res; 2021 May; 153(5&6):665-670. PubMed ID: 34414924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-collected gargle specimen as a patient-friendly sample collection method for COVID-19 diagnosis in a population context.
    Utama R; Hapsari R; Puspitasari I; Sari D; Hendrianingtyas M; Nurainy N
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):3706. PubMed ID: 35260654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simple Saliva Sample Collection for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Variants Compared With Nasopharyngeal Swab Sample.
    Jo SJ; Kim J; Kim S; Kim J; Kwon H; Kwon Y; Kim H; Kim HH; Lee H; Kim SW; Yeo CD; Lee SH; Lee J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Dec; 146(12):1435-1440. PubMed ID: 36026554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-Collected Saline Gargle Samples as an Alternative to Health Care Worker-Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Outpatients.
    Goldfarb DM; Tilley P; Al-Rawahi GN; Srigley JA; Ford G; Pedersen H; Pabbi A; Hannam-Clark S; Charles M; Dittrick M; Gadkar VJ; Pernica JM; Hoang LMN
    J Clin Microbiol; 2021 Mar; 59(4):. PubMed ID: 33514627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Gargle, Spit, and Sputum Specimens.
    Poukka E; Mäkelä H; Hagberg L; Vo T; Nohynek H; Ikonen N; Liitsola K; Helve O; Savolainen-Kopra C; Dub T
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Sep; 9(1):e0003521. PubMed ID: 34431686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-Based Detection Using Saliva or Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens in Asymptomatic Populations.
    Fan G; Qin X; Streblow DN; Hoyos CM; Hansel DE
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Sep; 9(1):e0006221. PubMed ID: 34431689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic Performance Assessment of Saliva RT-PCR and Nasopharyngeal Antigen for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Peru.
    Calderón RI; Jhaveri TA; Tovar MA; Palomino JS; Barreda NN; Sanabria OM; Peinado J; Ramirez C; Llanos Zavalaga LF; Valderrama G; Franke MF; Mitnick CD; Lecca L; Velásquez GE
    Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Aug; 10(4):e0086122. PubMed ID: 35867471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Natural spring water gargle samples as an alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection using a laboratory-developed test.
    Gobeille Paré S; Bestman-Smith J; Fafard J; Doualla-Bell F; Jacob-Wagner M; Lavallée C; Charest H; Beauchemin S; Coutlée F; Dumaresq J; Busque L; St-Hilaire M; Lépine G; Boucher V; Desforges M; Goupil-Sormany I; Labbé AC;
    J Med Virol; 2022 Mar; 94(3):985-993. PubMed ID: 34672374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.
    Uddin MKM; Shirin T; Hossain ME; Alam AN; Ami JQ; Hasan R; Miah M; Shaly NJ; Ahmed S; Rahman SMM; Rahman M; Banu S
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0046821. PubMed ID: 34730436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of an Automated High-Throughput Liquid-Based RNA Extraction Platform on Pooled Nasopharyngeal or Saliva Specimens for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR.
    Chu AW; Yip CC; Chan WM; Ng AC; Chan DL; Siu RH; Chung CYT; Ng JP; Kittur H; Mosley GL; Poon RW; Chiu RY; To KK
    Viruses; 2021 Apr; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 33918447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does sampling saliva increase detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR? Comparing saliva with oro-nasopharyngeal swabs.
    Dogan OA; Kose B; Agaoglu NB; Yildiz J; Alkurt G; Demirkol YK; Irvem A; Doganay GD; Doganay L
    J Virol Methods; 2021 Apr; 290():114049. PubMed ID: 33387561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in outpatients: A multicenter comparison of self-collected saline gargle, oral swab, and combined oral-anterior nasal swab to a provider collected nasopharyngeal swab.
    Kandel CE; Young M; Serbanescu MA; Powis JE; Bulir D; Callahan J; Katz K; McCready J; Racher H; Sheldrake E; Quon D; Vojdani OK; McGeer A; Goneau LW; Vermeiren C
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 42(11):1340-1344. PubMed ID: 33436122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of saliva as a specimen for detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR.
    Gupta M; Sinha P; Gupta S; Jain DK; Hooja S; Vyas N
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2022; 65(4):907-910. PubMed ID: 36308204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical concern on evaluating the consistency between gargle samples and nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs in RT-qPCR-based mass screening approach for the diagnosis of COVID-19.
    Li M; Yu T
    J Infect; 2022 Oct; 85(4):e102-e103. PubMed ID: 35809691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva specimens for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Japanese patients with COVID-19.
    Sakanashi D; Asai N; Nakamura A; Miyazaki N; Kawamoto Y; Ohno T; Yamada A; Koita I; Suematsu H; Hagihara M; Shiota A; Kurumiya A; Sakata M; Kato S; Muramatsu Y; Koizumi Y; Kishino T; Ohashi W; Yamagishi Y; Mikamo H
    J Infect Chemother; 2021 Jan; 27(1):126-129. PubMed ID: 33060046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SARS-COV-2 detection in saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs using RT-PCR was similar.
    Guimarães TC; Marques BBF; Tinoco JMM; Porto LCMS; Tinoco EMB; Fischer RG
    Braz Dent J; 2022; 33(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 35508038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.