These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35378671)

  • 1. Expert agreement in prior elicitation and its effects on Bayesian inference.
    Stefan AM; Katsimpokis D; Gronau QF; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Oct; 29(5):1776-1794. PubMed ID: 35378671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Practical challenges and methodological flexibility in prior elicitation.
    Stefan AM; Evans NJ; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Apr; 27(2):177-197. PubMed ID: 32940511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Remote, real-time expert elicitation to determine the prior probability distribution for Bayesian sample size determination in international randomised controlled trials: Bronchiolitis in Infants Placebo Versus Epinephrine and Dexamethasone (BIPED) study.
    Lan J; Plint AC; Dalziel SR; Klassen TP; Offringa M; Heath A;
    Trials; 2022 Apr; 23(1):279. PubMed ID: 35410375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayes factor in one-sample tests of means with a sensitivity analysis: A discussion of separate prior distributions.
    Du H; Edwards MC; Zhang Z
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Oct; 51(5):1998-2021. PubMed ID: 31161425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian sample size determination for phase IIA clinical trials using historical data and semi-parametric prior's elicitation.
    Berchialla P; Zohar S; Baldi I
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Mar; 18(2):198-211. PubMed ID: 30440109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Balancing the Elicitation Burden and the Richness of Expert Input When Quantifying Discrete Bayesian Networks.
    Barons MJ; Mascaro S; Hanea AM
    Risk Anal; 2022 Jun; 42(6):1196-1234. PubMed ID: 34146431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A valid and reliable belief elicitation method for Bayesian priors.
    Johnson SR; Tomlinson GA; Hawker GA; Granton JT; Grosbein HA; Feldman BM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 63(4):370-83. PubMed ID: 19926253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Confidence distributions for treatment effects in clinical trials: Posteriors without priors.
    Marschner IC
    Stat Med; 2024 Mar; 43(6):1271-1289. PubMed ID: 38205556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Constructing Relative Effect Priors for Research Prioritization and Trial Design: A Meta-epidemiological Analysis.
    Glynn D; Nikolaidis G; Jankovic D; Welton NJ
    Med Decis Making; 2023 Jul; 43(5):553-563. PubMed ID: 37057388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of two methods for expert elicitation in health technology assessments.
    Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():85. PubMed ID: 27456844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prior Elicitation for Use in Clinical Trial Design and Analysis: A Literature Review.
    Azzolina D; Berchialla P; Gregori D; Baldi I
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33668623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a practical approach to expert elicitation for randomised controlled trials with missing health outcomes: Application to the IMPROVE trial.
    Mason AJ; Gomes M; Grieve R; Ulug P; Powell JT; Carpenter J
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):357-367. PubMed ID: 28675302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling of experts' divergent prior beliefs for a sequential phase III clinical trial.
    Moatti M; Zohar S; Facon T; Moreau P; Mary JY; Chevret S
    Clin Trials; 2013 Aug; 10(4):505-14. PubMed ID: 23820061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian non-inferiority approach using experts' margin elicitation - application to the monitoring of safety events.
    Aupiais C; Alberti C; Schmitz T; Baud O; Ursino M; Zohar S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Sep; 19(1):187. PubMed ID: 31533631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Bayesian Sample Size Estimation Procedure Based on a B-Splines Semiparametric Elicitation Method.
    Azzolina D; Berchialla P; Bressan S; Da Dalt L; Gregori D; Baldi I
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(21):. PubMed ID: 36361129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why Bayesian Psychologists Should Change the Way They Use the Bayes Factor.
    Hoijtink H; van Kooten P; Hulsker K
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 26881951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel bayes factors that capture expert uncertainty in prior density specification in genetic association studies.
    Spencer AV; Cox A; Lin WY; Easton DF; Michailidou K; Walters K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 May; 39(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 25727067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application and Evaluation of an Expert Judgment Elicitation Procedure for Correlations.
    Zondervan-Zwijnenburg M; van de Schoot-Hubeek W; Lek K; Hoijtink H; van de Schoot R
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():90. PubMed ID: 28197115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian inference for psychology, part IV: parameter estimation and Bayes factors.
    Rouder JN; Haaf JM; Vandekerckhove J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):102-113. PubMed ID: 29441460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On weakly informative prior distributions for the heterogeneity parameter in Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis.
    Röver C; Bender R; Dias S; Schmid CH; Schmidli H; Sturtz S; Weber S; Friede T
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jul; 12(4):448-474. PubMed ID: 33486828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.