172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35379562)
1. Does Changing the Age of a Child to be Considered in 3-Level Version of EQ-5D-Y Discrete Choice Experiment-Based Valuation Studies Affect Health Preferences?
Ramos-Goñi JM; Estévez-Carrillo A; Rivero-Arias O; Rowen D; Mott D; Shah K; Oppe M
Value Health; 2022 Jul; 25(7):1196-1204. PubMed ID: 35379562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Valuation of EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y) and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Three-Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Health States: The Impact of Wording and Perspective.
Kreimeier S; Oppe M; Ramos-Goñi JM; Cole A; Devlin N; Herdman M; Mulhern B; Shah KK; Stolk E; Rivero-Arias O; Greiner W
Value Health; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1291-1298. PubMed ID: 30442276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for Indonesia by Mapping the DCE onto TTO Values.
Fitriana TS; Roudijk B; Purba FD; Busschbach JJV; Stolk E
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Dec; 40(Suppl 2):157-167. PubMed ID: 36348155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Adult and Adolescent Preferences Toward EQ-5D-Y-3L Health States.
Prevolnik Rupel V; Ramos-Goñi JM; Ogorevc M; Kreimeier S; Ludwig K; Greiner W
Value Health; 2021 Sep; 24(9):1350-1359. PubMed ID: 34452716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value Set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L in Hungary.
Rencz F; Ruzsa G; Bató A; Yang Z; Finch AP; Brodszky V
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Dec; 40(Suppl 2):205-215. PubMed ID: 36123448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Valuing EQ-5D-Y-3L Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment: Do Adult and Adolescent Preferences Differ?
Mott DJ; Shah KK; Ramos-Goñi JM; Devlin NJ; Rivero-Arias O
Med Decis Making; 2021 Jul; 41(5):584-596. PubMed ID: 33733920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Self vs. other, child vs. adult. An experimental comparison of valuation perspectives for valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L health states.
Lipman SA; Reckers-Droog VT; Karimi M; Jakubczyk M; Attema AE
Eur J Health Econ; 2021 Dec; 22(9):1507-1518. PubMed ID: 34611793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An exploration of methods for obtaining 0 = dead anchors for latent scale EQ-5D-Y values.
Shah KK; Ramos-Goñi JM; Kreimeier S; Devlin NJ
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Sep; 21(7):1091-1103. PubMed ID: 32506281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EQ-5D-Y Value Set for Slovenia.
Prevolnik Rupel V; Ogorevc M;
Pharmacoeconomics; 2021 Apr; 39(4):463-471. PubMed ID: 33565048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Child health valuation protocol for a discrete choice experiment comparing paired comparison and kaizen tasks and estimating US EQ-5D-Y-3L values on an experience scale.
Jumamyradov M; Craig BM; Rivero-Arias O; Jakubczyk M
BMJ Open; 2023 Oct; 13(10):e077256. PubMed ID: 37879694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Value Set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L in the Netherlands.
Roudijk B; Sajjad A; Essers B; Lipman S; Stalmeier P; Finch AP
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Dec; 40(Suppl 2):193-203. PubMed ID: 36216977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Valuation Survey of EQ-5D-Y Based on the International Common Protocol: Development of a Value Set in Japan.
Shiroiwa T; Ikeda S; Noto S; Fukuda T; Stolk E
Med Decis Making; 2021 Jul; 41(5):597-606. PubMed ID: 33754886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. International Valuation Protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L.
Ramos-Goñi JM; Oppe M; Stolk E; Shah K; Kreimeier S; Rivero-Arias O; Devlin N
Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Jul; 38(7):653-663. PubMed ID: 32297224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EQ-5D-Y Value Set for Germany.
Kreimeier S; Mott D; Ludwig K; Greiner W;
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Dec; 40(Suppl 2):217-229. PubMed ID: 35604633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why Do Adults Value EQ-5D-Y-3L Health States Differently for Themselves Than for Children and Adolescents: A Think-Aloud Study.
Reckers-Droog V; Karimi M; Lipman S; Verstraete J
Value Health; 2022 Jul; 25(7):1174-1184. PubMed ID: 35168891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: methodology report.
Mulhern B; Bansback N; Brazier J; Buckingham K; Cairns J; Devlin N; Dolan P; Hole AR; Kavetsos G; Longworth L; Rowen D; Tsuchiya A
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Feb; 18(12):vii-xxvi, 1-191. PubMed ID: 24568945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Choice Defines QALYs: A US Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L.
Craig BM; Rand K
Med Care; 2018 Jun; 56(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 29668646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.
Ferreira PL; Antunes P; Ferreira LN; Pereira LN; Ramos-Goñi JM
Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 31201730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring EQ-5D-Y-3L Experience-Based VAS Values Derived Among Adolescents.
Åström M; Rolfson O; Burström K
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2022 May; 20(3):383-393. PubMed ID: 35083734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for China.
Yang Z; Jiang J; Wang P; Jin X; Wu J; Fang Y; Feng D; Xi X; Li S; Jing M; Zheng B; Huang W; Luo N
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Dec; 40(Suppl 2):147-155. PubMed ID: 36396878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
