These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35379569)

  • 21. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.
    Helgestad OKL; Josiassen J; Hassager C; Jensen LO; Holmvang L; Udesen NLJ; Schmidt H; Berg Ravn H; Moller JE
    Open Heart; 2020; 7(1):e001214. PubMed ID: 32201591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Successful combined use of Impella Recover 2.5 device and intra-aortic balloon pump support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction.
    Wiktor DM; Sawlani N; Kanthi Y; Sipahi I; Fang JC; Blitz A
    ASAIO J; 2010; 56(6):519-21. PubMed ID: 20938341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impella in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: History and Current Controversies.
    Panhwar MS; Reed GW; Jain V; Ayoub A; Menon V; Lahorra JA; Kanaa'N A; Hedrick DP; Kapadia SR; LeJemtel T; Kalra A
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Oct; 34(10):E709-E719. PubMed ID: 36001457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
    Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acute intraventricular thrombosis of an impella LP 5.0 device in an ST-elevated myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Ranc S; Sibellas F; Green L
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2013 Jan; 25(1):E1-3. PubMed ID: 23293180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Rao L; Huang X; Luo J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Mar; 100(12):e25159. PubMed ID: 33761689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction: Impella CP/5.0 versus ECMO.
    Karami M; den Uil CA; Ouweneel DM; Scholte NT; Engström AE; Akin S; Lagrand WK; Vlaar AP; Jewbali LS; Henriques JP
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2020 Mar; 9(2):164-172. PubMed ID: 31353918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Outcomes of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Plus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping for Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Nishi T; Ishii M; Tsujita K; Okamoto H; Koto S; Nakai M; Sumita Y; Iwanaga Y; Matoba S; Kobayashi Y; Hirata KI; Hikichi Y; Yokoi H; Ikari Y; Uemura S
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Apr; 11(7):e023713. PubMed ID: 35377180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Efficacy of Mechanical Circulatory Support Used Before Versus After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock From ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Del Rio-Pertuz G; Benjanuwattra J; Juarez M; Mekraksakit P; Argueta-Sosa E; Ansari MM
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Sep; 42():74-83. PubMed ID: 35570152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mechanical circulatory support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump or medical treatment in cardiogenic shock-a critical appraisal of current data.
    Wernly B; Seelmaier C; Leistner D; Stähli BE; Pretsch I; Lichtenauer M; Jung C; Hoppe UC; Landmesser U; Thiele H; Lauten A
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 108(11):1249-1257. PubMed ID: 30900010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mechanical Circulatory Support: a Comprehensive Review With a Focus on Women.
    Alasnag M; Truesdell AG; Williams H; Martinez SC; Qadri SK; Skendelas JP; Jakobleff WA; Alasnag M
    Curr Atheroscler Rep; 2020 Apr; 22(3):11. PubMed ID: 32328843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impella Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for High-Risk PCI: A Propensity-Adjusted Large-Scale Claims Dataset Analysis.
    Lansky AJ; Tirziu D; Moses JW; Pietras C; Ohman EM; O'Neill WW; Ekono MM; Grines CL; Parise H
    Am J Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 185():29-36. PubMed ID: 36210212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock due to ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Analysis of the National Readmissions Database.
    Briasoulis A; Kampaktsis P; Emfietzoglou M; Kuno T; Van den Eynde J; Ntalianis A; Duque ER; Malik AH
    Angiology; 2023 Jan; 74(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 35440216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.
    Seyfarth M; Sibbing D; Bauer I; Fröhlich G; Bott-Flügel L; Byrne R; Dirschinger J; Kastrati A; Schömig A
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 52(19):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19007597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The evolving role of percutaneous ventricular assist devices in high-risk cardiac patients.
    Marcuschamer IA; Abelow A; Kornowski R
    Coron Artery Dis; 2018 Jun; 29(4):344-353. PubMed ID: 29465438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Device profile of the Impella 5.0 and 5.5 system for mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock: overview of its safety and efficacy.
    Pahuja M; Hernandez-Montfort J; Whitehead EH; Kawabori M; Kapur NK
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2022 Jan; 19(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 34894975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acute Cardiovascular Care Association position statement for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A document of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association of the European Society of Cardiology.
    Zeymer U; Bueno H; Granger CB; Hochman J; Huber K; Lettino M; Price S; Schiele F; Tubaro M; Vranckx P; Zahger D; Thiele H
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2020 Mar; 9(2):183-197. PubMed ID: 32114774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Commentary: successful combined use of the Impella Recover 2.5 device and intraaortic balloon pump support for cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction.
    El Oakley R
    ASAIO J; 2010; 56(6):517-8. PubMed ID: 21245797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: role of mechanical circulatory support.
    Aggarwal S; Slaughter MS
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2008 Oct; 6(9):1223-35. PubMed ID: 18939910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.