BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

706 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35380229)

  • 21. Comparison of [
    Kömek H; Can C; Kaplan İ; Gündoğan C; Kepenek F; Karaoglan H; Demirkıran A; Ebinç S; Güzel Y; Gündeş E
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Sep; 49(11):3898-3909. PubMed ID: 35578038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Role of [
    Zhao L; Pang Y; Luo Z; Fu K; Yang T; Zhao L; Sun L; Wu H; Lin Q; Chen H
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jun; 48(6):1944-1955. PubMed ID: 33415432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of
    Elboga U; Sahin E; Kus T; Cayirli YB; Aktas G; Okuyan M; Cinkir HY; Teker F; Sever ON; Aytekin A; Yılmaz L; Aytekin A; Cimen U; Mumcu V; Kilbas B; Eryilmaz K; Cakici D; Celen YZ
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Oct; 24(5):789-797. PubMed ID: 35411447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24.
    Sahin E; Kus T; Aytekin A; Uzun E; Elboga U; Yilmaz L; Cayirli YB; Okuyan M; Cimen V; Cimen U
    J Nucl Med; 2024 Apr; 65(4):512-519. PubMed ID: 38485276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [
    Zheng J; Liu F; Lin K; Zhang L; Huang N; Zheng W; Zhang J; Yao S; Miao W
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Dec; 24(6):973-985. PubMed ID: 35945360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The potential utility of [
    Lan L; Liu H; Wang Y; Deng J; Peng D; Feng Y; Wang L; Chen Y; Qiu L
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Feb; 49(3):963-979. PubMed ID: 34410435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Superior Tumor Detection for
    Pabst KM; Trajkovic-Arsic M; Cheung PFY; Ballke S; Steiger K; Bartel T; Schaarschmidt BM; Milosevic A; Seifert R; Nader M; Kessler L; Siveke JT; Lueckerath K; Kasper S; Herrmann K; Hirmas N; Schmidt HH; Hamacher R; Fendler WP
    J Nucl Med; 2023 Jul; 64(7):1049-1055. PubMed ID: 37024301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of [
    Chen H; Pang Y; Wu J; Zhao L; Hao B; Wu J; Wei J; Wu S; Zhao L; Luo Z; Lin X; Xie C; Sun L; Lin Q; Wu H
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jul; 47(8):1820-1832. PubMed ID: 32222810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy of [
    Zhang S; Wang W; Xu T; Ding H; Li Y; Liu H; Huang Y; Liu L; Du T; Zhao Y; Chen Y; Qiu L
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():925100. PubMed ID: 35847877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Head-to-head Intra-individual Comparison of [
    Novruzov E; Dendl K; Ndlovu H; Choyke PL; Dabir M; Beu M; Novruzov F; Mehdi E; Guliyev F; Koerber SA; Lawal I; Niegisch G; Debus J; Haberkorn U; Sathekge M; Giesel FL
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Aug; 24(4):651-658. PubMed ID: 35349039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of the role of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography and 68 Ga-labeled FAP inhibitor-04 PET/CT in patients with malignant mesothelioma.
    Güzel Y; Kömek H; Can C; Kaplan İ; Kepenek F; Ebinç S; Büyükdeniz MP; Gündoğan C; Oruç Z
    Nucl Med Commun; 2023 Jul; 44(7):631-639. PubMed ID: 37114422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [
    Yang L; Xu S; Cheng L; Gao C; Cao S; Chang Z; Wang K
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Nov; 50(13):4051-4063. PubMed ID: 37542659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. First Clinical Experience With [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46-PET/CT Versus [18F]F-FDG PET/CT for Nodal Staging in Cervical Cancer.
    Wegen S; Roth KS; Weindler J; Claus K; Linde P; Trommer M; Akuamoa-Boateng D; van Heek L; Baues C; Schömig-Markiefka B; Schomäcker K; Fischer T; Drzezga A; Kobe C; Köhler C; Marnitz S
    Clin Nucl Med; 2023 Feb; 48(2):150-155. PubMed ID: 36607364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparisons of Quantitative Parameters of Ga-68-Labelled Fibroblast Activating Protein Inhibitor (FAPI) PET/CT and [
    Siripongsatian D; Promteangtrong C; Kunawudhi A; Kiatkittikul P; Boonkawin N; Chinnanthachai C; Jantarato A; Chotipanich C
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Oct; 24(5):818-829. PubMed ID: 35486293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35.
    Qin C; Shao F; Gai Y; Liu Q; Ruan W; Liu F; Hu F; Lan X
    J Nucl Med; 2022 Jan; 63(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 33863819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography in the detection of ovarian malignancies.
    Zheng W; Liu L; Feng Y; Wang L; Chen Y
    Nucl Med Commun; 2023 Mar; 44(3):194-203. PubMed ID: 36472415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The performance of
    Jiang Y; Wen B; Li C; Tian Y; Xiao Z; Xu K; Xing D; Yu Z; Huang J; Jia J; He Y
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Jun; 50(7):2114-2126. PubMed ID: 36808001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical utility of [
    Zhao L; Pang Y; Zheng H; Han C; Gu J; Sun L; Wu H; Wu S; Lin Q; Chen H
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Oct; 48(11):3606-3617. PubMed ID: 33792760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of 18 F-FDG PET/CT and 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
    Can C; Kepenek F; Kömek H; Gündoğan C; Kaplan İ; Taşdemir B; Güzel Y; Agüloğlu N; Karaoğlan H
    Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Oct; 43(10):1084-1091. PubMed ID: 35972340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    Fu H; Wu J; Huang J; Sun L; Wu H; Guo W; Qiu S; Chen H
    Radiology; 2022 Aug; 304(2):397-405. PubMed ID: 35536131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.