These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35380344)

  • 1. Being More Educated and Earning More Increases Romantic Interest: Data from 1.8 M Online Daters from 24 Nations.
    Jonason PK; Thomas AG
    Hum Nat; 2022 Jun; 33(2):115-131. PubMed ID: 35380344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are Sex Differences in Preferences for Physical Attractiveness and Good Earning Capacity in Potential Mates Smaller in Countries With Greater Gender Equality?
    Zhang L; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(2):1474704919852921. PubMed ID: 31146580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mate selection among online daters in Shanghai: Why does education matter?
    Xiao S; Qian Y
    Chin J Sociol; 2020 Oct; 6(4):521-546. PubMed ID: 33240525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do Men and Women Know What They Want? Sex Differences in Online Daters' Educational Preferences.
    Whyte S; Chan HF; Torgler B
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1370-1375. PubMed ID: 29932820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex differences in sexual attraction for aesthetics, resources and personality across age.
    Whyte S; Brooks RC; Chan HF; Torgler B
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250151. PubMed ID: 34010298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sex Differences in Response to Deception Across Mate-Value Traits of Attractiveness, Job Status, and Altruism in Online Dating.
    Desrochers J; MacKinnon M; Kelly B; Masse B; Arnocky S
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Nov; 50(8):3675-3685. PubMed ID: 34664152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication.
    Walter KV; Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM; Asao K; Sorokowska A; Sorokowski P; Aavik T; Akello G; Alhabahba MM; Alm C; Amjad N; Anjum A; Atama CS; Atamtürk Duyar D; Ayebare R; Batres C; Bendixen M; Bensafia A; Bizumic B; Boussena M; Butovskaya M; Can S; Cantarero K; Carrier A; Cetinkaya H; Croy I; Cueto RM; Czub M; Dronova D; Dural S; Duyar I; Ertugrul B; Espinosa A; Estevan I; Esteves CS; Fang L; Frackowiak T; Garduño JC; González KU; Guemaz F; Gyuris P; Halamová M; Herak I; Horvat M; Hromatko I; Hui CM; Jaafar JL; Jiang F; Kafetsios K; Kavčič T; Kennair LEO; Kervyn N; Khanh Ha TT; Khilji IA; Köbis NC; Lan HM; Láng A; Lennard GR; León E; Lindholm T; Linh TT; Lopez G; Van Luot N; Mailhos A; Manesi Z; Martinez R; McKerchar SL; Meskó N; Misra G; Monaghan C; Mora EC; Moya-Garófano A; Musil B; Natividade JC; Niemczyk A; Nizharadze G; Oberzaucher E; Oleszkiewicz A; Omar-Fauzee MS; Onyishi IE; Özener B; Pagani AF; Pakalniskiene V; Parise M; Pazhoohi F; Pisanski A; Pisanski K; Ponciano E; Popa C; Prokop P; Rizwan M; Sainz M; Salkičević S; Sargautyte R; Sarmány-Schuller I; Schmehl S; Sharad S; Siddiqui RS; Simonetti F; Stoyanova SY; Tadinac M; Varella MAC; Vauclair CM; Vega LD; Widarini DA; Yoo G; Zat'ková M; Zupančič M
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Apr; 31(4):408-423. PubMed ID: 32196435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Big two personality and big three mate preferences: similarity attracts, but country-level mate preferences crucially matter.
    Gebauer JE; Leary MR; Neberich W
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1579-93. PubMed ID: 22956293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stepping out of the caveman's shadow: nations' gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences.
    Zentner M; Mitura K
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1176-85. PubMed ID: 22933455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital Ethnic Enclaves: Mate Preferences and Platform Choices Among Chinese Immigrant Online Daters in Vancouver.
    Cai M; Qian Y
    Can Rev Sociol; 2023 Feb; 60(1):130-153. PubMed ID: 36644990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of resource-gaining capacity on mate preferences: an eye tracking study.
    Zhao Z; Su W; Hou J
    BMC Psychol; 2023 Dec; 11(1):444. PubMed ID: 38111064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
    Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gender Norms and Gender Equality in Full-Time Employment and Health: A 97-Country Analysis of the World Values Survey.
    Cislaghi B; Bhatia A; Hallgren EST; Horanieh N; Weber AM; Darmstadt GL
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():689815. PubMed ID: 35769749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preference Versus Choice in Online Dating.
    Whyte S; Torgler B
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2017 Mar; 20(3):150-156. PubMed ID: 28263677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Too much of a good thing? Variety is confusing in mate choice.
    Lenton AP; Francesconi M
    Biol Lett; 2011 Aug; 7(4):528-31. PubMed ID: 21367779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-cultural variation in men's preference for sexual dimorphism in women's faces.
    Marcinkowska UM; Kozlov MV; Cai H; Contreras-Garduño J; Dixson BJ; Oana GA; Kaminski G; Li NP; Lyons MT; Onyishi IE; Prasai K; Pazhoohi F; Prokop P; Rosales Cardozo SL; Sydney N; Yong JC; Rantala MJ
    Biol Lett; 2014; 10(4):20130850. PubMed ID: 24789138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries.
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM; Asao K; Sorokowska A; Sorokowski P; Aavik T; Akello G; Alhabahba MM; Alm C; Amjad N; Anjum A; Atama CS; Duyar DA; Ayebare R; Batres C; Bendixen M; Bensafia A; Bizumic B; Boussena M; Butovskaya M; Can S; Cantarero K; Carrier A; Cetinkaya H; Croy I; Cueto RM; Czub M; Dronova D; Dural S; Duyar I; Ertugrul B; Espinosa A; Estevan I; Esteves CS; Fang L; Frackowiak T; Garduño JC; González KU; Guemaz F; Gyuris P; Halamová M; Herak I; Horvat M; Hromatko I; Hui CM; Jaafar JL; Jiang F; Kafetsios K; Kavčič T; Kennair LEO; Kervyn N; Thi Khanh Ha T; Khilji IA; Köbis NC; Lan HM; Láng A; Lennard GR; León E; Lindholm T; Thi Linh T; Lopez G; Van Luot N; Mailhos A; Manesi Z; Martinez R; McKerchar SL; Meskó N; Misra G; Monaghan C; Mora EC; Moya-Garófano A; Musil B; Natividade JC; Niemczyk A; Nizharadze G; Oberzaucher E; Oleszkiewicz A; Omar-Fauzee MS; Onyishi IE; Özener B; Pagani AF; Pakalniskiene V; Parise M; Pazhoohi F; Pisanski A; Pisanski K; Ponciano E; Popa C; Prokop P; Rizwan M; Sainz M; Salkičević S; Sargautyte R; Sarmány-Schuller I; Schmehl S; Sharad S; Siddiqui RS; Simonetti F; Stoyanova SY; Tadinac M; Varella MAC; Vauclair CM; Vega LD; Widarini DA; Yoo G; Zaťková M; Zupančič M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16885. PubMed ID: 31729413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Potentials-attract or likes-attract in human mate choice in China.
    He QQ; Zhang Z; Zhang JX; Wang ZG; Tu Y; Ji T; Tao Y
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e59457. PubMed ID: 23565153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental Evidence for Sex Differences in Sexual Variety Preferences: Support for the Coolidge Effect in Humans.
    Hughes SM; Aung T; Harrison MA; LaFayette JN; Gallup GG
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):495-509. PubMed ID: 32440927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.