These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35380833)

  • 1. Multilayer Subsystem Surface Hopping Method for Large-Scale Nonadiabatic Dynamics Simulation with Hundreds of Thousands of States.
    Qiu J; Lu Y; Wang L
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 May; 18(5):2803-2815. PubMed ID: 35380833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subspace Surface Hopping with Size-Independent Dynamics.
    Qiu J; Bai X; Wang L
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2019 Feb; 10(3):637-644. PubMed ID: 30674193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crossing Classified and Corrected Fewest Switches Surface Hopping.
    Qiu J; Bai X; Wang L
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2018 Aug; 9(15):4319-4325. PubMed ID: 30011207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mean-field dynamics with stochastic decoherence (MF-SD): a new algorithm for nonadiabatic mixed quantum/classical molecular-dynamics simulations with nuclear-induced decoherence.
    Bedard-Hearn MJ; Larsen RE; Schwartz BJ
    J Chem Phys; 2005 Dec; 123(23):234106. PubMed ID: 16392913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Branching and phase corrected surface hopping: A benchmark of nonadiabatic dynamics in multilevel systems.
    Shao C; Xu J; Wang L
    J Chem Phys; 2021 Jun; 154(23):234109. PubMed ID: 34241240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface Hopping Dynamics beyond Nonadiabatic Couplings for Quantum Coherence.
    Ha JK; Lee IS; Min SK
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2018 Mar; 9(5):1097-1104. PubMed ID: 29439572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics simulations based on time-dependent density functional tight-binding method.
    Wu X; Wen S; Song H; Frauenheim T; Tretiak S; Yam C; Zhang Y
    J Chem Phys; 2022 Aug; 157(8):084114. PubMed ID: 36049993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: modeling photophysics in organic conjugated materials.
    Nelson T; Fernandez-Alberti S; Roitberg AE; Tretiak S
    Acc Chem Res; 2014 Apr; 47(4):1155-64. PubMed ID: 24673100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Branching corrected surface hopping: Resetting wavefunction coefficients based on judgement of wave packet reflection.
    Xu J; Wang L
    J Chem Phys; 2019 Apr; 150(16):164101. PubMed ID: 31042881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the role of decoherence in condensed-phase nonadiabatic dynamics: a comparison of different mixed quantum/classical simulation algorithms for the excited hydrated electron.
    Larsen RE; Bedard-Hearn MJ; Schwartz BJ
    J Phys Chem B; 2006 Oct; 110(40):20055-66. PubMed ID: 17020394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. First Principles Nonadiabatic Excited-State Molecular Dynamics in NWChem.
    Song H; Fischer SA; Zhang Y; Cramer CJ; Mukamel S; Govind N; Tretiak S
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Oct; 16(10):6418-6427. PubMed ID: 32808780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of Mixed Quantum-Classical Approaches on Modeling the Crossover from Hopping to Bandlike Charge Transport in Organic Semiconductors.
    Xie W; Holub D; Kubař T; Elstner M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Apr; 16(4):2071-2084. PubMed ID: 32176844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decoherence and Its Role in Electronically Nonadiabatic Dynamics.
    Shu Y; Truhlar DG
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Jan; 19(2):380-95. PubMed ID: 36622843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An efficient solution to the decoherence enhanced trivial crossing problem in surface hopping.
    Bai X; Qiu J; Wang L
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Mar; 148(10):104106. PubMed ID: 29544303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decoherence-induced surface hopping.
    Jaeger HM; Fischer S; Prezhdo OV
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Dec; 137(22):22A545. PubMed ID: 23249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benchmark Performance of Global Switching versus Local Switching for Trajectory Surface Hopping Molecular Dynamics Simulation: Cis↔Trans Azobenzene Photoisomerization.
    Yue L; Yu L; Xu C; Lei Y; Liu Y; Zhu C
    Chemphyschem; 2017 May; 18(10):1274-1287. PubMed ID: 28213950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface hopping dynamics using a locally diabatic formalism: charge transfer in the ethylene dimer cation and excited state dynamics in the 2-pyridone dimer.
    Plasser F; Granucci G; Pittner J; Barbatti M; Persico M; Lischka H
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Dec; 137(22):22A514. PubMed ID: 23249051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-adiabatic Excited-State Molecular Dynamics: Theory and Applications for Modeling Photophysics in Extended Molecular Materials.
    Nelson TR; White AJ; Bjorgaard JA; Sifain AE; Zhang Y; Nebgen B; Fernandez-Alberti S; Mozyrsky D; Roitberg AE; Tretiak S
    Chem Rev; 2020 Feb; 120(4):2215-2287. PubMed ID: 32040312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the performance of trajectory surface hopping methods: Ultrafast internal conversion in pyrazine.
    Xie W; Sapunar M; Došlić N; Sala M; Domcke W
    J Chem Phys; 2019 Apr; 150(15):154119. PubMed ID: 31005116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of trajectory surface hopping method in the treatment of ultrafast intersystem crossing dynamics.
    Peng J; Xie Y; Hu D; Lan Z
    J Chem Phys; 2019 Apr; 150(16):164126. PubMed ID: 31042919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.