These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35381230)

  • 1. Disposable versus reusable gastroscopes: a prospective randomized noninferiority trial.
    Luo X; Ji M; Zhang S; Chen X; Zong Y; Zhang X; Hu H; Hao X; Shao L; Sun C; Shi H; Wang J; Wang B; Li P
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Aug; 96(2):250-261. PubMed ID: 35381230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Disposable protection for flexible gastroenterologic endoscopy: prospective comparative evaluation of a new gastroscopy system (Endosheath) compared to the standard fiberglass gastroscope].
    Mayinger B; Strenkert B; Martus P; Kunz B; Hahn EG; Hochberger J
    Z Gastroenterol; 1998 Jun; 36(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 9675835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrathin disposable gastroscope for screening and surveillance of gastroesophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis: a prospective comparative study.
    Huynh DK; Toscano L; Phan VA; Ow TW; Schoeman M; Nguyen NQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1212-1217. PubMed ID: 27894929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disposable-sheath, flexible gastroscope system versus standard gastroscopes: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Mayinger B; Strenkert M; Hochberger J; Martus P; Kunz B; Hahn EG
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Oct; 50(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 10502164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
    Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in alarm events between disposable and reusable electrocardiography lead wires.
    Albert NM; Murray T; Bena JF; Slifcak E; Roach JD; Spence J; Burkle A
    Am J Crit Care; 2015 Jan; 24(1):67-73; quiz 74. PubMed ID: 25554556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A performance, safety and cost comparison of reusable and disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Rizzo J; Bernstein D; Gress F
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 10699767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and efficacy of a novel disposable sheathed gastroscopic system in clinical practice.
    Jin P; Wang X; Yu DL; Li AQ; Wang HH; Meng MM; Li SR; Liu DQ; Sheng JQ; Cai Q
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 29(4):757-61. PubMed ID: 24325649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of reusable versus disposable draping material on infection rates in implant-based breast reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial.
    Showalter BM; Crantford JC; Russell GB; Marks MW; DeFranzo AJ; Thompson JT; Pestana IA; David LR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2014; 72(6):S165-9. PubMed ID: 24374400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of a single-use gastroscope for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Prospective evaluation.
    van der Ploeg K; de Jonge PJF; Lammers WJ; Koch AD; Vos MC; Paulsen V; Aabakken L; Bruno M
    Endosc Int Open; 2024 Mar; 12(3):E428-E434. PubMed ID: 38504741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Disposable with Reusable Blades for a Morcellator Device.
    Becker B; Orywal AK; Hausmann T; Gross AJ; Netsch C
    J Endourol; 2017 Mar; 31(3):314-319. PubMed ID: 27981854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [EXPERIENCE IN THE USE OF THE GASTROSCOPE WITH A FIBER OPTICAL DEVICE (FIBROSCOPE)].
    SMIRNOV NS; SOKOLOV LK
    Klin Med (Mosk); 1965 Feb; 43():35-8. PubMed ID: 14299097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equivalent performance of single-use and reusable duodenoscopes in a randomised trial.
    Bang JY; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Gut; 2021 May; 70(5):838-844. PubMed ID: 32895332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a novel disposable esophagogastroduodenoscopy system in emergency, bedside, and intraoperative settings: Pilot study (with videos).
    Han ZL; Lin BT; Wang ZJ; Chen X; Xi YY; Wang JF; Qiao WG; Huang Y; Lin ZZ; Huang SH; Chua TY; Liu SD; Luo XB
    Dig Endosc; 2023 Nov; 35(7):857-865. PubMed ID: 36905288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Utility of a Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope Compared with a Standard Reusable Device: A Randomized Noninferiority Study.
    Holmes A; O'Kane D; Wombwell A; Grills R
    J Endourol; 2023 Jan; 37(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 36128833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways.
    Eckelman M; Mosher M; Gonzalez A; Sherman J
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 22492190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of Single-Use FlexorVue vs Reusable BoaVision Ureteroscope for Visualization of Calices and Stone Extraction in an Artificial Kidney Model.
    Schlager D; Hein S; Obaid MA; Wilhelm K; Miernik A; Schoenthaler M
    J Endourol; 2017 Nov; 31(11):1139-1144. PubMed ID: 28844156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Endoscopic complication: unsuspected impact of gastroscope into the oesophagus in a patient with a large hiatal hernia].
    Munkedal DL; Gade J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 Apr; 174(18):1238-9. PubMed ID: 22546166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A cost and performance evaluation of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy.
    Yang R; Ng S; Nichol M; Laine L
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 10699769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An operating gastroscope.
    BENEDICT EB
    Gastroenterology; 1948 Sep; 11(3):281-3. PubMed ID: 18886355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.